"Sorting Out" collective leadership: How Q-methodology can be used to evaluate leadership development

Leadership Quarterly

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 620-632

  Militello, Matthew ^a   Benham, Maenette K P ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective leadership; Evaluation; Q methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956264951     PISSN: 10489843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barbosa J., Willoughby P., Rosenberg C., Mrtek R. Statistical methodology: VII. Q-methodology, a structured analytical approach to medical subjectivity. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998, 5:1032-1040.
2. Benham M. An alternative perspective of educational leadership for change: Reflections on Native/Indigenous ways of knowing. Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration 2002, 133-165. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger (Eds.).
3. Benham M. Leading in full vision of the Kiha: a native Hawaiian woman's perspective of leadership and spirituality. Inspiring Practice: Spirituality and Educational Leadership 2005, 117-128. Lancaster, PA: Pro Active Publications. C.M. Shields, M.M. Edwards, A. Sayani (Eds.).
4. Benham M., Militello M., Elissetche C., Oliver J., Ortiz A. KLCC I longitudinal report 2007, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
5. Benham M., Militello M., Halladay P. Kellogg leadership for community change: Focus on teaching and learning. Final evaluation 2005, The W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
6. Bledsoe K.L., Graham J.A. The use of multiple evaluation approaches in program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 2005, 26(3):302-319.
7. Bogdan R.C., Biklen S.K. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods 1992, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
8. Brown S.R. Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science 1980, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
9. Brown S.R. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 1993, 16:91-138.
10. Brown S.R. Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, November 1996, (4):561-567.
11. Brown S.R., Durning D.W., Selden S. Q methodology. Handbook of research methods in public administration 1999, 599-637. Marcel Dekker, New York. G.J. Miller, M.L. Whicker (Eds.).
12. Brown S.R., Ungs T. Representativeness and the study of political behavior: an application of Q technique to reactions to the Kent State incident. Social Science Quarterly 1970, 51(3):514-526.
13. Brungardt C. The making of leaders: a review of the research in leadership development and education. Journal of Leadership Studies 1996, 3(3):81-95.
14. Burke M.J., Day R.R. A cumulative study of the effectiveness of managerial training. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1986, 71:232-245.
15. Chavis D.M. Looking the enemy in the eye: gazing into the mirror of evaluation practice. The Evaluation Exchange. 2004, 9(4):8-9.
16. Chavis D.M. The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology 2001, 29(2):309-320.
17. Collins D.B., Horton E.F. The effectiveness of managerial leadership development programs: a meta-analysis of studies from 1982-2001. Human Resource Development Quarterly 2004, 15(2):217-248.
18. Cross R.M. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Education Research 2005, 20(2):206-213.
19. Day D.D. Leadership development: a review in context. Leadership Quarterly 2001, 11(4):581-613.
20. Foster-Fishman P., Nowell B., Deacon Z., Nievar M.A., McCann P. Using methods that matter: the impact of reflection, dialogue, and voice. American Journal of Community Psychology 2005, 36(3/4):275-291.
21. The handbook of leadership development evaluation 2007, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. K.M. Hannum, J.W. Martineau, C. Reinelt (Eds.).
22. Culture, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 societies 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R.J. House, P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman, V. Gupta (Eds.).
23. Hughes, P., Nienow, D., Ruder, K., Hale, B., & Rollins, K. (2005). The framework: A tool to develop collective leadership for community change. Retrieved March 17, 2007, from http://www.ethicalleadership.org/publications/Framework%20Publication%202005.pdf.
24. Hyde M.M., Chavis D.M. Sense of community and community building. Handbook of community movements and local organizations 2006, 179-192. Springer, New York. R.A. Cnaan, C. Milofsky (Eds.).
25. Larson C.L., Murtadha K. Leadership for social justice. The educational leadership challenge: redefining leadership for the 21st century 2002, 136-161. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. J. Murphy (Ed.).
26. Lee B., Anderson J.Q. An analysis of Internet adopters. Operant Subjectivity 2001, 25(1):11-36.
27. Lee B., Synn W. Investor response to online stock trading: a study using Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 2001, 24(3):109-131.
28. Marshall H. The social identities of women lawyers. Operant Subjectivity 1991, 14(3):106-121.
29. Marzano R.J., Waters T., McNulty B. School leadership that works: from research to results 2005, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
30. McKeown B., Thomas D. Q methodology 1988, Sage Publications, London.
31. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook 1994, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. 2nd ed.
32. Militello M., Janson C. Socially-focused, situationally-driven practice: a study of distributed leadership practices among school principals and counselors. Journal of School Leadership 2007, 17(4):409-441.
33. Rapp D. Social justice and the importance of rebellious oppositional imaginations. Journal of School Leadership 2002, 12:226-245.
34. Rawls J. A theory of justice 1971, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Rhoads J., Brown S. Sex, lies, and videotape: attitudes toward the Clinton impeachment. Operant Subjectivity 2002, 25(2):99-116.
36. Rohs F.R. Improving the evaluation of leadership programs: control response shift. Journal of Leadership Education 2002, 1(2):50-61.
37. Rohs F.R., Langone C.A. Increased accuracy in measuring leadership impacts. Journal of Leadership Studies 1997, 4(1):150-158.
38. Russon C., Reinelt C. The results of an evaluation scan of 55 leadership development programs. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 2004, 10(3):104-107.
39. Schmolck, P., & Atkinson, J. (1997). MQMethod (2.06). Retrieved June 1, 2005, from http://www.qmethod.org.
40. Shields C.M. Dialogic leadership for social justice: overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly 2004, 40(1):109-132.
41. Singer J. Pairing Q methodology and case studies to explore journalists' attitudes toward new media forms. Operant Subjectivity 1999, 22(1/2):1-19.
42. Stainton Rogers R. Q methodology 1995, SAGE, London.
43. Stainton Rogers R., Stenner P., Gleesen K., Stainton Rogers W. Social psychology: a critical agenda 1995, Polity Press, Cambridge.
44. Thomas D., McBride A., Baas L. Contrary convictions: race and subjectivity in public opinion on the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. Operant Subjectivity 1996, 19(3/4):58-84.
45. Kellogg Foundation W.K. Valuing and building youth and adult partnerships to advance just communities 2006, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
46. Kellogg Foundation W.K. The collective leadership framework: a workbook for cultivating and sustaining community change 2007, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
47. Yukl G.A. Leadership in organizations 2002, Routledge Publishing, London.
48. Zimmerman-Oster K., Burkhardt J. Leadership in the making: a comprehensive examination of the impact of leadership development programs on students. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 1999, 6(3/4):50-66.