Examining the effects of information quality on behavioral intention of knowledge management system

Journal of Quality

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 297-309

  Lu, Iuan Yuan ^a   Kuo, Tsuang ^a   Lee, Wen Pin ^a  

^a NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Behavioral intention; Information quality; Knowledge management system; Structuralequation modeling (SEM)

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; COMPETITIVE EDGES; DRIVING FORCES; EASE OF USE; ENVIRONMENT CHANGE; INDIRECT PATHS; INFORMATION QUALITY; INTEGRATED MODELS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE-SHARING; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SEM; STRUCTURALEQUATION MODELING (SEM); WEB TECHNOLOGIES;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 77956259432     PISSN: 10220690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E., 2001, Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
2. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W., 1988, Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommendedtwo-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
3. Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., Moberg, D. P. and Christiansen, A., 2004, Understanding adolescentintentions to smoke: an examination of relationships among social influences, prior trial behaviors, and antitobacco campaign advertising, Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 110-123.
4. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A., 1986, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
5. Chen, L. D., Gillenson, M. L. and Sherrell, D. L., 2002, Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective, Information and Management, 39(8), 705-719.
6. Chiu, C. M., Chiu, C. S. and Chang, H. C., 2007, Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners' satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention, Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271-287.
7. Damodaran, L. and Olphert, W., 2000, Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems, Behaviour and Information Technology, 19(6), 405-413.
8. Davis, F. D., 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
9. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R., 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
10. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M., 1987, The support of autonomy and the control of behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037.
11. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., 1992, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
12. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., 2003, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
13. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
14. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
15. Geffen, D. and Keil, M., 1998, The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology of the technology acceptance model, Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 29(2), 35-49.
16. Gentry, L. and Canlatone, R., 2002, A comparison of three models to explain shop-bot use on the web, Psychology and Marketing, 19(11), 945-956.
17. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L., 2006, Multivariate data analysis, 6th edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
18. Halawi, L. A., McCarthy, R. V. and Aronson, J. E., 2007, An empirical investigation of knowledge management systems' success, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 121-135.
19. Henry, J. W. and Stone, R. W., 1994, A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer based medical information systems, Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3), 21-33.
20. Huang, H. M. and Liaw, S. S., 2005, Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool, Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 729-743.
21. Lai, H. and Chu, T. H., 2002, Knowledge management: a review of industrial cases, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(5), 26-39.
22. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P., 2003, Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information and Management, 40(3), 191-204.
23. Lin, C. C. and Lu, H., 2000, Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site, International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197-208.
24. Lin, H. F., 2007, Measuring online learning systems success: applying the updated DeLone and McLean model, Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(6), 817-820.
25. Lu, C. S., Lai, K. H. and Cheng, T. C. E., 2007, Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use Internet services in liner shipping, European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 845-867.
26. Nonaka, I., 1994, A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
27. Nunnally, J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
28. Ong, C. S. and Lai, J. Y., 2007, Measuring user satisfaction with knowledge management systems: scale development, purification, and initial test, Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1329-1346.
29. Quaddus, M. and Xu, J., 2005, Adoption and diffusion of knowledge management systems: field studies of factors and variables, Knowledge-Based Systems, 18(2-3), 107-115.
30. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M. and Martinez, F. J., 2006, Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696.
31. Ruggles, R., 1998, The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice, California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89.
32. Seddon, P. B., 1997, A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success, Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253.
33. Shih, H. P., 2004, An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the web, Information and Management, 41(3), 351-368.
34. Venkatesh, V., 1999, Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation, MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
35. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D., 1996, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test, Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-477. (Pubitemid 126311946)
36. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D., 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
37. Wu, J. H. and Wang, Y. M., 2006, Measuring KMS success: a respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model, Information and Management, 43(6), 728-739.
38. Zack, M. H., 1999, Managing codified knowledge, Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.