Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico City

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 100, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1789-1798

  Thrasher, James F ^a,b   Pérez Hernández, Rosaura ^a,b   Swayampakala, Kamala ^a,c   Arillo Santillán, Edna ^b   Bottai, Matteo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

^c SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEXICO; PASSIVE SMOKING; POLICY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; URBAN POPULATION;

HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MEXICO; PUBLIC POLICY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 77956243185     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180950     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brownson RC, Hopkins DP, Wakefield M. Effects of smoking restrictions in the workplace. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:333-348.
2. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free policies on smoking behavior: a systematic review. BMJ. 2002;325(7357):188.
3. Wasserman J, Manning WG, Newhouse JP, Winkler JD. The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking. J Health Econ. 1991;10(1):43-64.
4. Jacobson PD, Zapawa LM. Clean indoor air restrictions. In: Rabin RL, Sugarman SD, eds. Regulating Tobacco New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:207-244.
5. Hamilton WL, Biener L, Brennen RT. Do local tobacco regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult and youth surveys in Massachusetts. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(4):709-722.
6. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
7. Mathers C, Lancer D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006:3(11):e442.
8. Thrasher JF, Reynales-Shigematsu L, BaezcondeGarbanati L, et al. Promoting the effective translation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: a case study of challenges and opportunities for strategic communications in Mexico. Eval Health Prof. 2008;31(2): 145-166.
9. Thrasher JF, Besley JC, González W. Perceived justice and popular support for public health laws: a case study around comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(5):787-793.
10. Sussman S, Pokhrel P, Black D, et al. Tobacco control in developing countries: Tanzania, Nepal, China, and Thailand as examples. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(3): S447-S457.
11. Edwards R, Thomson G, Wilson N, et al. After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand. Tob Control. 2008:17(1):1-10.
12. Gorini G, Chellini E, Galeone D. What happened in Italy? A brief summary of studies conducted in Italy to evaluate the impact of the smoking ban. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(10):1620-1622.
13. Tang H, Cowling D, Lloyd J, et al. Changes of attitudes and patronage behaviors in response to a smoke-free law. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4): 611-617.
14. Friis RH, Safer AM. Analysis of responses of Long Beach, California residents to the smoke-free bars law. Public Health 2005:119(12):1116-1121.
15. Rayens M, Hahn E, Langley R, Hedgecock S, Butler K, Greathouse-Maggio L. Public opinion and smoke-free laws. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2007;8(4):262-270.
16. Biener L, Garrett C, Skeer M, Siegel M, Connolly G. The effects on smokers of Boston's smoke-free bar ordinance: a longitudinal analysis of changes in compliance, patronage, policy support and smoking at home. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007:13(6): 630-636.
17. Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland R, Hammond D, Hastings G, McNeil AD, et al. Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(suppl 3):iii51-iii58.
18. Hyland A, Higbee C, Borland R, et al. Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(6):642-649.
19. Hilton S, Semple S, Miller B, et al. Expectations and changing attitudes of bar workers before and after the implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(206):1-11.
20. Tang H, Cowling DW, Stevens CM, Lloyd JC. Changes of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preference of bar owner and staff in response to a smoke-free bar law. Tob Control 2004;13(1):87-89.
21. Pursell L, Allwright S, O'Donovan D, et al. Before and after study of bar workers' perceptions of the impact of smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(147):131.
22. Sebrié EM, Schoj V, Glantz SA Smoke free environments in Latin America: on the road to real change? Prev Control. 2008;3(1):21-35.
23. Thrasher JF, Chaloupka F, Hammond D, et al. Evaluación de las politicas contra el tabaquismo ai países latinoamericanos en la era del Convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco. Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48(suppl 1):S155-S166.
24. Thrasher JF,1 Boado M, Sebrié EM, Bianco E. Smokefree policies and the social acceptability of smoking in Uruguay and Mexico: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(6):591-599.
25. Haw SJ, Gruer L. Changes in exposure of adult nonsmokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in. Scotland: national cross-sectional survey. BMJ. 2007:335(7619):549-552.
26. Skeer M, Land ML, Cheng DM, Siegel MB. Smoking in Boston bars before and after a 100% smoke-free regulation: an assessment of early compliance. J Public Heath Manag Pract 2004;10(6):501-507.
27. Akhtar P, Currie D, Currie C, Haw S. Changes in Child Exposure to Environmental. Tobacco Smoke (CHETS) study after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: National cross-sectional survey. BMJ 2007;335(7619):545-549.
28. Abundis F. La ley general de control del tabaco y la opinión pública. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(suppl 3): S366-S371.
29. Thrasher JF, Bentley ME. The meanings and context of smoking among Mexican university students. Public Health Rep. 2006;121(5):578-585.
30. González-Roldan JF. Abogacía para el control del tabaco en. México: retos y recomendaciones. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(suppl 3):S391-S400.
31. Mondragón M. Prohibición de fumar en lugares públicos y mercantiles: retos para implementar la ley en el Distrito Federal. Salud Publica Mex. 2008; 50(suppl 3):S401-S404.
32. Expacios Guillermo-Tenorio X. 100% libres de humo: una realidad del. Distrito Federal. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(suppl 3):S384-S390.
33. Sebrié EM, Glantz SA "Accommodating" smokefree policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America Tob Control. 2007; 16(5):e6.
34. Llaguno-Aguilar SE, Dorantes-Alonso AC, Thrasher JF, Villalobos V, Besley JC. Análisis de la cobertura del tema de tabaco en medios impresos mexicanos. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(suppl 3):S348-S354.
35. Villalobos V, Ortiz-Ramirez O, Thrasher JF, ArilloSantillán E, Pérez-Hernández R, Cedillo C, González W. Mercadotecnia social para promover politicas publicas de salud: el desarrollo de una campaña para promover la norma social de no fumar en restaurantes y bares del Distrito Federal, México. Salud Publica Mex. In press.
36. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 3rd ed. Lenexa, KS: American. Association for Public Opinion Research; 2004.
37. Methods for Evaluating Tobacco Control Policies. Vol. 12. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2009.
38. Hyland A, Hassan LM, Higbee C, et al. The impact of smokefree legislation in Scotland: results from the Scottish ITC: Scotland/UK longitudinal surveys. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(2):198-205.
39. Encuesta Nacional de Opinión Pública: Espacios Libres de Humo de Tabaco. Juárez, Mexico: Consejo Nacional contra. Tabaquismo; 2009.
40. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health 2006;96(8): 1359-1363.
41. Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Reynales Shigematsu L-M, Lazcano-Ponce E. Lugares 100% Libres de. Humo de Tabaco: Exposición a Humo de Tabaco y Efectos a la Salud en Bares y Restaurantes de Mexico. Cuernavaca, Mernco: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2009.
42. Thrasher J, Swayampakala K, Villalobos V, ArilloSantillán E, Walseman K, Bottai M. Differential impact of local and federal smoke-free legislation in Mexico: a longitudinal study of campaign exposure, support for smokefree policies and secondhand tobacco smoke exposure among adult smokers. Salud Publica Mex In press.