A framework for enhancing depth perception in computer graphics

Proceedings - APGV 2010: Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 141-148

  Cipiloglu, Zeynep ^a   Bulbul, Abdullah ^a   Capin, Tolga ^a  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Computer graphics; Cue combination; Depth cues; Depth perception; Perceptually aware rendering

Indexed keywords

COST-PROFIT ANALYSIS; CUE COMBINATION; DEPTH CUE; DEPTH ENHANCEMENT; FUZZY LOGIC-BASED ALGORITHM; GRAPHICAL METHODS; KNAPSACK MODEL; PERCEPTUALLY-AWARE RENDERING; RENDERING METHODS; SELECTION TECHNIQUES; SPATIAL LAYOUT; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIMENTS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FUZZY LOGIC; PROFITABILITY; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 77956243173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1836248.1836276     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. AKENINE-MOLLER, T., HAINES, E., AND HOFFMAN, N. 2008. Real-Time Rendering, third ed. A. K. Peters, ch. 6.
2. BRACKSTONE, M. 2000. Examination of the use of fuzzy sets to describe relative speed perception. Ergonomics 43, 4, 528-542.
3. BRADSHAW, M. F., PARTON, A. D., AND GLENNERSTER, A. 2000. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research 40, 27, 3725-3734.
4. BULBUL, A., CIPILOGLU, Z., AND CAPIN, T. 2010. A colorbased face tracking algorithm for enhancing interaction with mobile devices. The Visual Computer 26, 5, 311-323.
5. BULBUL, A., CIPILOGLU, Z., AND CAPIN, T. 2010. A perceptual approach for stereoscopic rendering optimization. Computers & Graphics 34, 2, 145-157.
6. BULTHOFF, H. H., AND YUILLE, A. 1996. A Bayesian Framework for the Integration of Visual Modules.
7. BUNNEL, M. 2004. Dynamic Ambient Occlusion and Indirect Lighting. Addison Wesley.
8. CUTTING, J. E., AND VISHTON, P. M. 1995. Perception of Space and Motion. Handbook of Perception and Cognition, second ed. Academic Press, 69-117.
9. DODGSON, N. A. 2005. Autostereoscopic 3d displays. Computer 38, 31-36.
10. 1997. Fuzzy control programming. Tech. rep., International Electrotechnical Commision.
11. GOOCH, A., GOOCH, B., SHIRLEY, P., AND COHEN, E. 1998. A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration.In SIGGRAPH '98: Proceedings of the 25th annual conferenceon Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 447-452.
12. HAEBERLI, P., AND AKELEY, K. 1990. The accumulation buffer: Hardware support for high-quality rendering. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 24, 4, 309-318.
13. HOWARD, I., AND ROGERS, B. 2008. Seeing in Depth. Oxford University Press.
14. LUFT, T., COLDITZ, C., AND DEUSSEN, O. 2006. Image enhancement by unsharp masking the depth buffer. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3, 1206-1213.
15. MALONEY, L. T., AND LANDY, M. S. 1989. A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. In SPIE Visual Commmunications and Image Processing IV, vol. 1199, 1154-1163.
16. MARKOSIAN, L., KOWALSKI, M. A., GOLDSTEIN, D., TRYCHIN, S. J., HUGHES, J. F., AND BOURDEV, L. D. 1997. Real-time nonphotorealistic rendering. In SIGGRAPH '97: Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 415-420.
17. NIENHAUS, M., AND DOELLNER, J. 2003. Edge-enhancement - an algorithm for real-time non-photorealistic rendering. Journal of WSCG, 346-353.
18. ORUC, I., MALONEY, T., AND LANDY, M. 2003. Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research 43, 2451-2468.
19. RHEINGANS, P. AND EBERT, D. 2001. Volume illustration: Nonphotorealistic rendering of volume models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 7, 253-264.
20. RUSSELL, J. 1997. How shall an emotion be called. Circumplex models of personality and emotions, 205-220.
21. SCHRATER, P. R., AND KERSTEN, D. 2000. How optimal depth cue integration depends on the task. International Journal of Computer Vision 40, 73-91.
22. SHIRLEY, P. 2002. Fundamentals of Computer Graphics. A. K. Peters, Ltd.
23. TARINI, M., CIGNONI, P., AND MONTANI, C. 2006. Ambient occlusion and edge cueing for enhancing real time molecular visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 12, 5 (Sept.-Oct.), 1237-1244.
24. WANGER, L. R., FERWERDA, J. A., AND GREENBERG, D. A. 1992. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 12, 44-58.
25. WANGER, L. 1992. The effect of shadow quality on the perception of spatial relationships in computer generated imagery. In SI3D '92: Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39-42.
26. WARE, C., AND MITCHELL, P. 2008. Visualizing graphs in three dimensions. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 5, 1, 1-15.
27. WARE, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Elsevier, ch. 8.
28. WEISKOPF, D., AND ERTL, T. 2002. A depth-cueing scheme based on linear transformations in tristimulus space. Tech. rep., Visualization and Interactive Systems Group University of Stuttgart.