Complications of ERCP: Prediction, prevention and management

ERCP

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 51-59

  Freeman, Martin L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956237661     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-4271-6.50011-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes JA, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991, 37:383-391.
2. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996, 335:909-918.
3. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:425-434.
4. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:417-423.
5. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 48:1-10.
6. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:652-656.
7. Cheng C, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2005 (in press).
8. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003, 35:830-834.
9. Trap R, Adamsen S, Hart-Hansen O, et al. Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals. Endoscopy 1999, 31:125-130.
10. Singh P, Gurudu SR, DavidoffS, et al. Sphincter of Oddi manometry does not predispose to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:499-505.
11. Freeman ML, Guda NL Cannulation techniques for ERCP: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:112-125.
12. Fogel EL, Eversman D, Jamidar P, et al. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy 2002, 34:280-285.
13. Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P, et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005, 37:58-65.
14. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:830-834.
15. Freeman ML, Guda NM Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:684-845.
16. Tarnasky P, Palesch Y, Cunningham J, et al. Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 1998, 115:1518-1524.
17. Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF, et al. Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 57:291-294.
18. Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:544-550.
19. Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:367-370.
20. Freeman ML, Overby CS, Qi DF Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure, and results of a modified technique to maximize success. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:8-14.
21. Smith MT, Sherman S, Ikenberry SO, et al. Alternations in pancreatic ductal morphology following polyethylene pancreatic stent therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:268-275.
22. Kozarek RA Pancreatic stents can induce ductal changes consistent with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1990, 36:93-95.
23. Rashdan A, Fogel EL, McHenry L, et al. Improved stent characteristics for prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:322-329.
24. Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:1291-1299.
25. Baron TH, Harewood GC Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1455-1460.
26. Elta GH, Barnett JL, Wille RT, et al. Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blended current. Gastrointest Endosc 1998, 47:149-153.
27. Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy 2002, 34:293-298.
28. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999, 126(4):658-663.
29. Baron TH, Gostout CJ, Herman L Hemoclip repair of a sphincterotomy-induced duodenal perforation. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:566-568.
30. Harris A, Chan AC, Torres-Viera C, et al. Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1999, 9:718-724.