The normal ranges of cardiovascular parameters in children measured using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1875-1881

  Cattermole, Giles N ^a   Leung, P Y Mia ^a,b   Mak, Paulina S K ^a   Chan, Stewart S W ^a   Graham, Colin A ^a   Rainer, Timothy H ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

diagnostic techniques and procedures; Doppler; hemodynamics; pediatrics; resuscitation; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CHILD; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HEART FUNCTION TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARDS;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 77956231366     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e8adee     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. USCOM Ltd: The Basics. Sydney, USCOM Ltd, 2006.
2. USCOM Ltd: USCOM 1A User Manual. Sydney, USCOM Ltd, 2006.
3. Skowno JJ, Broadhead M: Cardiac output measurement in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anesth 2008; 18:1019-1028.
4. Todd DA, Meyer S, Shadbolt B: Assessment of cardiac output using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitoring (USCOM) device in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Paediatr Child Health 2008; 44:A115.
5. Heerman WJ, Churchwell KB, Taylor MB: Clinical utility of CW Doppler Ultrasound for Measuring Cardiac Output (USCOM). Proceedings of the 2005 Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Symposium Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2006; 7(Suppl):S31.
6. Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, et al: Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:666-688.
7. Richardson JR, Ferguson J, Hiscox J, et al: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output in children. J Accid Emerg Med 1998; 15: 304-307.
8. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Course Manual. Eighth Edition. Chicago, ACS, 2008, p 235.
9. Cole TJ, Green PJ: Smoothing reference centile curves: The LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 1992; 11:1305-1319.
10. Altman DG, Bland JM: Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32:307-317.
11. Bailey SM, Sarmandal P, Grant JM: A comparison of three methods of assessing interobserver variation applied to measurement of the symphysis-fundal height. Br J Osbtet Gynaecol 1989; 96:1266-1271.
12. Smith BE, Madigan VM: Optimising haemodynamics in the shocked child\The dangers of applying adult parameters to children. HK J Emerg Med 2006; 13:250-251.
13. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, et al: Stroke volume and cardiac output in normotensive children and adults. Circulation 1997; 95:1837-1843.
14. Holbrook PR, ed: Textbook of Pediatric Critical Care. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1993.
15. Todres D, Fugate JH, eds: Critical Care of Infants and Children. Boston, Little, Brown and Co, 1996.
16. Nichols DG, ed. Rogers' Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care. Fourth Edition. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer, 2008.
17. López-Herce J, Bustinaza A, Sancho L, et al: Cardiac output and blood volume parameters using thermodilution. Pediatr Int 2009; 51: 59-65.
18. Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, et al: Cardiac output measurement in children: Comparison of the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1060-1064.
19. Meyer S, Todd D, Wright I, et al: Review article: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound. Emerg Med Australas 2008; 20:201-208.
20. Jain S, Allins A, Salim A, et al: Noninvasive Doppler ultrasonography for assessing cardiac function: Can it replace the Swan-Ganz catheter? Am J Surg 2008; 196:961-968.
21. Thiruchelvam T, Brierley J, Peters M: Assessment of a non-invasive paediatric cardiac output (CO) monitor. Crit Care Med 2007; 35(Suppl):A77.
22. Lichtenthal PR, Phillips RA, Sloniger JA: USCOM cardiac output\Accuracy in infants and children. 20th ESICM Annual Congress 2007, abstract 0187.
23. Phillips R, Paradisis M, Evans N, et al: Cardiac output measurement in preterm neonates: Validation of USCOM against echocardiography. 26th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2006, abstract P343.
24. Stewart GM, Nguyen HB, Kim TY, et al: Inter-rater reliability for noninvasive measurement of cardiac function in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24:433-437.
25. Cattermole GN, Leung PYM, Tang CO, et al: A new method to score the quality of USCOM scans. HK J Emerg Med 2009; 16:288.
26. Sung RYT, Choi KC, So HK, Nelson EAS, et al: Oscillometrically measured blood pressure in Hong Kong Chinese children and associations with anthropometric parameters. J Hypertension 2008; 26:678-684