Relaxed selection against accidental binding of transcription factors with conserved chromatin contexts

Gene

Volumn 466, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 43-48

  Babbitt, G A ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding motif; Chromatin; Evolution; Natural selection; Nucleosome; Transcription factor binding

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; CHROMATIN; NUCLEOSOME;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENOME; HUMAN; NATURAL SELECTION; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; BINDING SITE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; NUCLEOSOMES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 77956229306     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albert I., et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2007, 446:572-576.
2. Arya G., Maitra A., Grigoryev S.A. A structural perspective of the where, how, what and why of nucleosome positioning. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics; Current Perspectives on Nucleosome Positioning 2010, 27(6):803-820.
3. Babbitt G.A., Kim Y. Inferring natural selection on fine-scale chromatin organization in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25(8):1714-1727.
4. Babbitt G.A., Tolstorukov M.Y., Kim Y. The molecular evolution of nucleosome positioning through sequence-dependent deformation of the DNA polymer. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics; Current Perspectives on Nucleosome Positioning 2010, 27(6):765-780.
5. Guccione E., et al. Myc-binding recognition in the human genome is determined by chromatin context. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8(7):764-770.
6. Hahn M.W., Stajich J.E., Wray G.A. The effects of selection against spurious transcription factor binding sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20(6):901-906.
7. He H.H., et al. Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42(4):343-347.
8. Ioshikhes I., Trifonov E.N., Zhang M.Q. Periodical distribution of transcription factor sites in promoter regions and connection with chromatin structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96(6):2891-2895.
9. Ioshikhes I.P., Albert I., Zanton S.J., Pugh B.F. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:1210-1215.
10. Kaplan N., et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2009, 458:362-366.
11. Karlin S., Burge C., Cambell A.M. Statistical analyses of counts and distributions of restriction sites in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20(6):1363-1370.
12. Kellis M., Patterson N., Endrizzi M., Birren B., Lander E.S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 2003, 423:241-254.
13. Lam F.H., Steger D.J., O'Shea E.K. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range. Nature 2008, 453:246-251.
14. Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M. Understanding the molecular machinery of genetics through #D structures. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:141-151.
15. Lee W., et al. A high resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39(10):1235-1244.
16. Maffey A.H., et al. Probasin promoter assembles into a strongly positioned nucleosome that permits androgen receptor binding. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2007, 268:10-19.
17. Mavrich T.N., et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 2008, 18:1073-1083.
18. Narlikar L., Gordan R., Hartemink A.J. A nucleosome-guided map of transcriptionfactor binding sites in yeast. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3(11):2199-2208. e215.
19. Oduro A.K., Fritsch M.K., Murdoch F.E. Chromatin context dominates estrogen regulation of pS2 gene expression. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314:2796-2810.
20. Ringrose L., Rehmsmeier M., Dura J.M., Paro R. Genome-wide prediction of Polycomb/Trithorax response elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Cell 2003, 5:759-771.
21. Rohs R., West S.M., Sosinsky A., Liu P., Mann R.S., Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA interaction. Nature 2009, 461:1248-1254.
22. Segal E., et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 2006, 442:772-778.
23. Smale S.T. Core promoters: active contributors to combinatorial gene regulation. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:2503-2508.
24. Teixeira M.C., et al. The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34. D447-database issue.
25. Tirosh I., Weinberger A., Bezalel D., Kaganovich M., Barkai N. On the relation between promoter divergence and gene expression evolution. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4:159.
26. Tolstorukov M.Y., Colasanti A.V., McCandlish D.M., Olson W.K., Zhurkin V.B. A novel roll-and-slide mechanism of DNA folding in chromatin: implications for nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371:725-738.
27. Tolstorukov M.Y., Choudhary V., Olson W.K., Zhurkin V.B., Park P.J. nuScore: a web-interface for nucleosome positioning predictions. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(12):1456-1458.
28. Wray G.A., et al. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20:1377-1419.