Water Distribution Scenarios in the Mexican Valley

Water Resources Management

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2959-2970

  Salazar, Raquel ^a   Szidarovszky, Ferenc ^b   Rojano, Abraham ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO   (Mexico)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict resolution; Mexican Valley; Nash bargaining; Scenarios; Water distribution

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT RESOLUTION; MEXICAN VALLEY; NASH BARGAINING; SCENARIOS; WATER DISTRIBUTION;

ECONOMICS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; LANDFORMS; WATER SUPPLY;

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS;

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; GAME THEORY; GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT; WATER DEMAND; WATER SUPPLY;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 77956170114     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-010-9589-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bekele EG, Nicklow JW (2005) Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms. Water Resour Res 41: W10406. doi: 10. 1029/2005WR004090.
2. Bogardi JJ, Nachtnebel HP (1994) Multi-criteria decision analysis in water resources management. UNESCO Publ. SC94/WS. 14. UNESCO, Paris.
3. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA) (2004) Compendio del Agua 2004. Región XIII Aguas en el Valle de Mexico y Sistema Cutzamala.
4. Coppola E Jr, Szidarovszky F (2004) Conflict between water supply and environmental health risk: a computational neural network approach. Int Game Theor Rev 6(4): 475-492.
5. Cyert RM, DeGroot MH (1973) An analysis of cooperation and learning in a duopoly context. Am Econ Rev 63(1): 24-37.
6. Donevska K, Dodeva S, Tadeva J (2003) Urban and agricultural competition for water in the Republic of Macedonia. http://afeid. montpellier. cemagref. fr/mpl2003/Conf/Donevska. pdf.
7. Forgo F, Szep J, Szidarovszky F (1999) Introduction to the theory of games. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
8. Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1972) A generalized Nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information. Manage Sci 18: 80-106.
9. Hipel KW (1992) Multiple objective decision making in water resources. Water Resour Bull 28(1): 3-11.
10. Jensen PK, Hoek WVD, Konradsen F, Jehangir WA (1998) Domestic use of irrigation water in Punjab. In: 24th WEDC conference sanitation and water for All, Islamabad, Pakistan.
11. Kapelan ZS, Savic DA, Walters GA (2005) Multiobjective design of water distribution systems under uncertainty. Water Resour Res 41: W11407.
12. Kucukmehmetoglu M (2009) A game theoretic approach to assets the impacts of major investments on transboundary water resources: The case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Water Resour Manag 23: 3069-3099.
13. Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18: 155-162.
14. Roth EA (1979) Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin.
15. Salazar R, Szidarovszky F, Coppola E, Rojano A (2007) Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. J Environ Manag 84: 560-571.
16. UNESCO (2006) El Agua, una responsabilidad compartida: 2. informe de las Naciones Unidas sobre el desarrollo de los recursos hídricos en el mundo. 568 pp, illus, maps; UN-WATER/WWAP/2007/02.
17. Yang CC, Chang LC, Chen CS, Yeh MS (2009) Multi-objective planning for conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water using genetic algorithm and dynamics programming. Water Resour Manag 23: 417-437.
18. Zhang Q, Werner AD (2009) Integrated surface-subsurface modeling of Fuxianhu Lake Catchment, Southwest China. Water Resour Manag 23: 2189-2204.