Spatial analysis of anthropogenic disturbances in mangrove forests of Bhitarkanika Conservation Area, India

Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 67-83

  Ambastha, K R ^a   Hussain, S A ^a   Badola, R ^a   Roy, P S ^b  

^a WILDLIFE INSTITUTE OF INDIA   (India)

^b National Remote Sensing Centre   (India)

Author keywords

Anthropogenic Disturbance; Geographic Information Systems (GIS); Mangrove Forests; Remote Sensing; Resource Use; Total Use Value

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIOTIC FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; FUELWOOD; GIS; MANGROVE; PRIORITIZATION; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; COASTAL ZONE; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LANDSCAPE; PROTECTED AREA; RESOURCE USE; SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY;

BHITARKANIKA; INDIA; ORISSA; BHITARKANIKA NATIONAL PARK;

EID: 77956124392     PISSN: 0255660X     EISSN: 09743006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-010-0013-y     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abdullah SA and Nakagoshi N (2007) Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 241(1-3): 39-48.
2. Badola R (2000) Local people amidst the changing conservation ethos: Relationships between People and Protected Areas in India. In: Decentralization and Devolution of Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific, eds., T., Enters, P. B., Drust and M., Victor, Bangkok: RECOFTC Report No. 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1.
3. Badola R and Hussain SA (2003) Valuation of Bhitarkanika Mangrove Ecosystem for Ecological Security and Sustainable Resource Use. Study Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India.
4. Badola R and Hussain SA (2005) Valuing the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environmental Conservation 32(1): 85-92.
5. Banerjee LK (1984) Vegetation of Bhitarkanika Sanctuary in Cuttack district, Orissa, India. Indian Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 5(5): 1065-1079.
6. Barbier EB (2006) Natural barriers to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front Ecol Environ 4(3): 124-131.
7. Beland M, Goita K, Bonn F and Pham TTH (2006) Assessment of land-cover changes related to shrimp aquaculture using remote sensing data: a case study in the Giao Thuy District, Vietnam. Int J Remote Sens 27(8): 1491-1510.
8. Blasco F, Aizpuru M and Gers C (2001) Depletion of the mangroves of continental Asia. Wetlands Ecology and Management 9(3): 245-256.
9. Brosius P (2004) Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas at the World Parks Congress. Conservation Biology. 18(3): 609-612.
10. Burrough P and McDonnell R (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, London.
11. Chadha S and Kar CS (1999) Bhitarkanika, Myth and Reality. Nataraj Publishers, Dehra Dun, India.
12. Champion HG and Seth SK (1968) A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India Press, New Delhi, India.
13. Chen R and Twilley RR (1998) A gap dynamic model of mangrove forest development along gradients of soil salinity and nutrient resources. Journal of Ecology 86(1): 37-51.
14. Cohen MCL and Lara RJ (2003) Temporal changes of mangroves vegetation boundaries in Amazonia: application of GIS and remote sensing techniques. Wetl Ecol Manage 11(4): 223-231.
15. Cohen WB, Spies TA, Alig RJ, Oetter DR, Maiersperger TK and Fiorella M (2002) Characterizing 23 years (1972-1995) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery Ecosystems 5(2): 122-137.
16. Couturier S, Gastellu-Etchegorry JP, Patino P and Martin E (2009) A model-based performance test for forest classifiers on remote sensing imagery. Forest Ecology and Management 257(1): 23-37.
17. Dahdouh-Guebas F and Koedam N (2008) Long term retrospection on mangrove development using transdisciplinary approaches: A review. Aquatic Botany 89(2): 80-92.
18. Ewel KC, Twilley RR and Ong JE (1998a) Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Global Ecol Biogeogr 7: 83-94.
19. Ewel KC, Zheng S, Pinzon ZS and Bourgeois JA (1998) Environmental effects of canopy gap formation in high rainfall mangrove forests. Biotropica 30(4): 510-519.
20. Farnsworth EJ and Ellison AM (1997) The global conservation status of mangroves. Ambio 26(6): 328-334.
21. Fromard F, Vega C and Proisy C (2004) Half a century of dynamic coastal change affecting mangrove shorelines of French Guiana: a case study based on remote sensing data analyses and field surveys. Mar Geol 208(2-4): 265-280.
22. Gammage S (1997) Estimating the returns to mangrove conversion: sustainable management or short-term gain. Discussion Paper (DP97-02), presented at a workshop on Mechanisms for Financing Wise Use of Wetlands Dakar, Senegal 13 November 1998, pp. 81.
23. Hambrey J (1996) Comparative economics of landuse options in mangroves. Aquaculture Asia 1(2): 10-14.
24. Hardy CC, Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Samson RN (2001) Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10(3/4): 353-372.
25. Hemstrom MA, Korol JJ and Hann WJ (2001) Trends in terrestrial plant communities and landscape health indicate the effects of alternative management strategies in the interior Columbia River basin. Forest Ecology and Manage 153(12): 105-125.
26. Hussain SA and Badola R (2008) Valuing mangrove ecosystem services: linking nutrient retention function of mangrove forests to enhanced agroecosystem production. Wetlands Ecology & Manage 16(6): 441-450.
27. Kammerbauer J and Ardon C (1999) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical watershed in the hillside region of central Honduras Agric Ecosyst Environ 75(1): 93-100.
28. Kar SK and Bustard HR (1986). Status of the saltwater Crocodile (Crocodylus porosus, Schneider) in the Bhitarkanika wildlife sanctuary, Orissa, India. J of Bombay Natural History Society 86: 140-150.
29. Karthiresan K, Murthy P and Ravikumar S (1995) Studies on root growth of a tropical mangrove tree species. International Tree Crops Journal 8(2-3): 183-188.
30. Krause G, Bock M, Weirs S and Braun G (2004). Mapping land-cover and mangrove structures with remote sensing techniques: A contribution to a synoptic GIS in support of coastal management in North Brazil. Environmental Management 34(3): 429-440.
31. Krishnamurthy K, Choudhury A and Untawale AG (1987). Status report, Mangroves in India, Ministry of Environment and Forests. New Delhi: Govt. of India.
32. Lam N (1983). Spatial interpolation methods: a review. The American Cartographer 10(2): 129-149.
33. Larson P, Freudenberger M and Wyckoff-Baird B (1998) WWF Integrated Conservation and Development Projects: Ten Lessons from the Field 1985-1996. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D. C.
34. Lewis RR (2000) Ecologically based goal setting in mangrove forest and tidal marsh restoration in Florida. Ecol Eng 15: 191-198.
35. McGarigal K and Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 122 p.
36. Menon S and Bawa KS (1997) Applications of geographic information systems (GIS), remote sensing and a landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats. Current Science 73(2): 134-145.
37. Miller JN, Brooks RP and Croonquist MJ (1997) Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities. Landscape Ecology 12(3): 137-153.
38. Millington AC, Velez-Liendo XM and Bradley AV (2003) Scale dependence in multitemporal mapping of forest fragmentation in Bolivia: implication for explaining temporal trends in landscape ecology and applications to biodiversity conservation. J Photo Rem Sens 57(4): 289-299.
39. Mishra R (1968) Ecology Workbook. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi.
40. Moloney KA and Levin SA (1996) The effects of disturbance architecture on landscape-level population dynamics. Ecology 77(2): 375-394.
41. Muttitanon W and Tripathi NK (2005). Land use/land cover changes in the coastal zone of Ban Don Bay, Thailand using Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens 26(11): 231-233.
42. Nilsson C and Grelsson G (1995) The fragility of ecosystems: a review. Journal of Applied Eco 32(4): 677-692.
43. Norussis MJ (1994) SPSS professional statistics Version 8. 0. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc.
44. NSSO (1997) Energy used by Indian Households. National Sample Survey Organization, Department of Statistics, New Delhi. Report No. 410/2.
45. O'Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH and Graham RL (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology. 1(3): 153-162.
46. Opdam P, Foppen R, Reijnen R. and Schotman A (1995) The landscape ecologist approach to in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 137(1): 139-146.
47. Pandav B (1997) Birds of Bhitarkanika mangroves, Eastern India. Forktail. 12(1): 9-20.
48. Patnaik MR, Purohit KL and Patra AK (1995). Mangrove swamps of Bhitarkanika Orissa, India - A great eco habitat for wildlife. Cheetal 34(1): 1-9.
49. Pinto L (1987) Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of juvenile fish in the mangroves of Pagbilae, Philippines. Hydrobiologia 150(3): 283-301.
50. Prance GT, Balee W, Boom BM and Carnerio RL (1987) Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4): 296-310.
51. Primavera JH and Agbayani RF (1997) Comparative strategies in community-based mangrove rehabilitation programmes in the Philippines. In: Hong PN, Ishwaran N, San HT, Tri NH, Tuan MS (eds), Proceedings of Ecotone V, Community Participation in Conservation, Sustainable Use and Rehabilitation of Mangroves in Southeast Asia, UNESCO, Japanese Man and the Biosphere National Committee and Mangrove Ecosystem Research Centre, Vietnam. pp. 229-243.
52. Ramachandran S, Sundramoorthy S, Krishnamoorthy R, Devasenpathy J and Thanikachalam M (1998) Application of remote sensing and GIS to coastal wetland ecology of Tamil Nadu and Andaman and Nicobar group of islands with special reference to mangroves. Current Science 75(3): 236-244.
53. Ravan SA and Roy PS (2000). Landscape level characterization of biological rich forest sitesutility of remote sensing and spatial analysis tools. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics 1(2): 11-22.
54. Romme WH and Knight DH (1982) Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone Park. Bioscience 32(8): 664-670.
55. Roy PS. (1989) Mangrove vegetation stratification using Salyut 7 photographs. Geocarto International 4: 31-47.
56. Roy PS and Behera MD (2002) Biodiversity assessment at landscape level. Tropical Ecology 43(1): 151-171.
57. Roy PS, Padalia H, Chauhan N, Porwal MC, Gupta S, Biswas S and Jagdale R (2005). Validation of Geospatial model for Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level - a study in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Ecological Modeling 185(24): 349-369.
58. Roy PS and Tomar S (2000). Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using Geospatial Modeling Technique. Biological Conservation 95(1): 95-109.
59. Saenger P (2002) Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and Conservation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
60. Saenger P, Hegerl EJ and Davie JDS (1983) Global Status of Mangrove Ecosystems. Commission on Ecology Papers No. 3. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
61. Sayre R, Roca E and Sedaghatkish G (2000) Nature in Focus: Rapid Ecological Assessment. Washington DC: Island Press.
62. Scott DA (1989) A Directory of Asian Wetlands. IUCN, Cambridge, U. K.
63. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2001) Sustainable Management of Non-Timber Forest Resources. Montreal, SCBD, (CBD Technical Series no. 6), pp. 30.
64. Selvam V (2003) Environmental classification of mangrove wetlands of India. Current Science 84(6): 757-765.
65. Spalding M, Blasco F and Field C eds. (1997) World Mangrove Atlas. International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems, Okinawa, Japan.
66. Spaninks F and van Beukering P (1997) Economic Valuation of Mangrove Ecosystems: Potential and Limitations. CREED Working Paper Series 14. London, UK: IIED.
67. State of Forest Report (2001) Forest Survey of India. Ministry of Environment and Forests. Dehra Dun, Government of India.
68. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171-197.
69. Valiela I, Bowen JL and York JK (2001) Mangrove forests: one of the world's threatened major tropical environments. BioScience 51(10): 807-815.
70. van Laake PE and Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2004) Focus on deforestation: zooming in on hot spots in highly fragmented ecosystems in Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102(1): 3-15.
71. Walters BB (2004) Local management of mangrove forests: effective conservation or efficient resource exploitation? Hum Ecol 32(2): 177-195.
72. Walters BB, Ronnback P, Kovacs JM, Crona B, Hussain SA, Badola R, Primavera JH, Barbier E and Dahdouh-Guebas F (2008) Ethnobiology, socioeconomics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquatic Botany 89(2): 220-236.
73. White PS and Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbances and patch dynamics: an introduction. In STA Pickett and PS White (eds), 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, pp. 3-13. Academic Press, New York.
74. Wilkie DS, Shaw E, Rotberg F, Morelli G and Auzel P (2000) Roads, development and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology 14(6): 1614-1622.
75. Williams M (1991) Wetlands: A Threatened Landscape. Basil Blackwell, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
76. Zharikov Y, Skilleter GA, Loneragan NR, Taranto T and Cameron BE (2005). Mapping and characterizing subtropical estuarine landscapes using aerial photography and GIS for potential application in wildlife conservation and management. Biological Conservation 125(1): 87-100.