Primary care clinicians' knowledge and confidence about newborn screening for sickle cell disease: Randomized assessment of educational strategies

Journal of the National Medical Association

Volumn 102, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 676-683

  Oyeku, Suzette O ^a,b   Feldman, Henry A ^c,g   Ryan, Kathleen ^e   Muret Wagstaff, Sharon ^f,g   Neufeld, Ellis J ^c,d,g  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT MONTEFIORE   (United States)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^f BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Infant health; Sickle cell anemia

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEMOGLOBINOPATHY; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZATION; SELF CONCEPT; SICKLE CELL ANEMIA; ANEMIA, SICKLE CELL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

ANEMIA, SICKLE CELL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASSACHUSETTS; NEONATAL SCREENING; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 77956096078     PISSN: 00279684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30652-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Consensus conference. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies. JAMA. 1987;258(9):1205-1209.
2. National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center. National Newborn Screening Status Report. http://genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/nbsdisorders.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2009.
3. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Sickle Cell Disease in Newborns: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. AHRQ Publication No. 07-05104-EF-2. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf07/sicklecell/sicklers. htm. Accessed March 20, 2009.
4. Pass KA, Lane PA, Fernhoff PM, et al. US newborn screening system guidelines II: follow-up of children, diagnosis, management, and evaluation. Statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services (CORN). J Pediatr. 2000;137(4 suppl):S1-S46.
5. Kim S, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Tonniges TF. Examination of the communication practices between state newborn screening programs and the medical home. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):E120-E126.
6. Serving the Family From Birth to the Medical Home. Newborn Screening: A Blueprint for the Future - A Call for a National Agenda on State Newborn Screening Programs. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2):389-422.
7. Kemper AR, Uren RL, Moseley KL, Clark SJ. Primary care physicians' attitudes regarding follow-up care for children with positive newborn screening results. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):1836-1841.
8. Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997;315(7105):418-421.
9. Smith WR. Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques To change physician behavior. Chest. 2000;118(2 suppl):8S-17S.
10. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
11. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215.
12. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274(9):700-705.
13. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995;153(10):1423-1431.
14. Bauchner H, Simpson L, Chessare J. Changing physician behaviour. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(6):459-462.
15. Davis D, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA. 1999;282(9):867-874.
16. American Academy of Pediatrics. Health supervision for children with sickle cell disease. Pediatrics. 2002;109(3):526-535.
17. National Institutes of Health. The Management of Sickle Cell Disease. US Department of Health and Human Services publication NIH 02-2117. Bethesda, MD; 2002.
18. Desposito F, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Tonniges TF, Rhein F, Mann M. Survey of pediatrician practices in retrieving statewide authorized newborn screening results. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):E22.
19. American College of Medical Genetics Newborn Screening Expert Group. Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system - executive summary. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5 Pt 2):S296-S307.
20. American College of Medical Genetics. Newborn screening ACT sheets and confirmatory algorithms. www.acmg.net/resources/policies/ACT/condition-analyte- links.htm.Accessed March 20, 2009.