A visual analytics approach to diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI data

VMV 2009 - Proceedings of the Vision, Modeling, and Visualization Workshop 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 351-362

  Glaßer, Sylvia ^a   Schäfer, Sebastian ^a   Oeltze, Steffen ^a   Preim, Uta ^a   Tonnies K D ^a   Preim, Bernhard ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST DCE MRIS; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; EARLY BREAST CANCER; IMAGE MODALITY; MALIGNANT CHANGES; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; VISUAL ANALYTICS; X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY;

DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; TUMORS; VISUALIZATION;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 77956094715     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. C.K. Kuhl. The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging, Part I. Radiology, 244(2):356-378, 2007.
2. C.K. Kuhl, P. Mielcareck, S. Klaschik and et al. Dynamic Breast MR Imaging: Are Signal Intensity Time Course Data Useful for Differential Diagnosis of Enhancing Lesions? Radiology, 211(1):101-110, 1999.
3. T.C. Williams, W.B. DeMartini, S.C. Partridge and et al. Breast MR Imaging: Computeraided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions. Radiology, 244(1):94-103, 2007.
4. E. Furman-Haran, D. Grobgeld, F. Kelcz and H. Degani.Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrastenhanced breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 13:862-867, 2001.
5. H. Degani, V. Gusis, D. Weinstein and et al. Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med, 3:780-782, 1997.
6. S. Mussurakis, D.L. Buckley and A. Hors-man Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 21:431-438, 1997.
7. E.A. Hauth, C. Stockamp, S. Maderwald and et al. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrastenhanced MR mammography. J Clinical Imaging, 30(3):160-165, 2006.
8. K.H. Englmeier and G. Hellwig and J. Griebel and et al. Morphofunctional visualization of dynamic MR-mammography. Stud Health Technol Inform. 107(2):838-841, 2004.
9. U. Behrens, J. Teubner, C. Evertsz and et al. Computer-Assisted Dynamic Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced-MRI. In Proc. of CARS, 362-367, 1996.
10. B. Preim, S.Oeltze, M. Mlejnek and et al.Survey of the Visual Exploration and Analysis of Perfusion Data. In IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(2):205-20, 2009.
11. S. Kohle, B. Preim, J. Wiener and et al. Exploration of time-varying data for Medical Diagnosis. In Proc. of VMV, pages 31-38, 2002.
12. D. Rueckert, L. Sonoda, C. Hayes and et al. Nonrigid Registration Using Free-Form Deformations: Application to Breast MR Images. In IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 18(8):712-721, 1999.
13. M. Mjelnek, P. Ermes, A. Vilanova and et al. Application-Oriented Extensions of Profile Flags In Proc. of EuroVis, 339-346, 2006.
14. E. Coto, S. Grimm, S. Bruckner and et al. Mammo Explorer: An advanced CAD application for breast DCE-MRI. In Proc. of VMV, 91-98, 2005.
15. W. Chen, M. L. Giger and U. Bick. A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images. Academic Radiology, 13(1): 63-72, 2006.
16. K.D. Toennies, A. Celler, S. Blinder and et al. Scatter segmentation in dynamic SPECT images using principal component analysis. In Proc. of SPIE, 2003.
17. R.C. Gonzales and R.E. Woods. Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, 2002.