Participation under time constraints: Landowner perceptions of rapid response to the emerald ash borer

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1013-1022

  Mackenzie, F Bruce ^a   Larson, M H Brendon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Environmental management; Institutional trust; Invasive species; Public participation

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; LANDOWNER; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

AGRILUS PLANIPENNIS; COLEOPTERA; FRAXINUS;

EID: 77956071764     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920903339707     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Auerbach, C. F., and L. B. Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
2. Burtt, B. 2004. Tree-killer bug hitting Ontario. Guelph Mercury, April 5.
3. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2009. Emerald ash borer. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/pestrava/agrpla/agrplae.shtml (accessed 23 August 2009).
4. Chase, L. C., D. J. Decker, and T. B. Lauber. 2004. Public participation in wildlife management: What do stakeholders want? Society Nat. Resources 17: 629-639.
5. Davenport, M. A., J. E. Leahy, D. H. Anderson, and P. J. Jakes. 2007. Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: A case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environ. Manage. 39: 353-368.
6. Environment Canada. 2004. An invasive alien species strategy for Canada. http://www.ec.gc.ca/eee-ias (accessed 23 August 2009).
7. Evans, J. M., A. C. Wilkie, and J. Burkhardt. 2008. Adaptive management of nonnative species: Moving beyond the "either-or" through experimental pluralism. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 21: 521-539.
8. Flint, C. G., B. McFarlane, and M. Müller. 2009. Human dimensions of forest disturbance by insects: An international synthesis. Environ. Manage. 43: 1174-1186.
9. Frentz, I. C., D. E. Voth, S. Burns, and C. W. Sperry. 2000. Forest Service-community relationship building: Recommendations. Society Nat. Resources 13: 549-566.
10. Holland, R. 2003. Ottawa indifferent to ash tree threat. London Free Press, March 7.
11. Konisky, D. M., and T. C. Beierle. 2001. Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making: Examples from the Great Lakes region. Society Nat. Resources 14: 815-826.
12. Leahy, J. E., and D. H. Anderson. 2008. Trust factors in community-water resource management agency relationships. Landscape Urban Plan. 87: 100-107.
13. Lodge, D. M., S. Williams, H. J. MacIsaac, K. R. Hayes, B. Leung, S. Reichard, R. N. Mack, P. B. Moyle, M. Smith, D. A. Andow, J. T. Carlton, and A. McMichael. 2006. Biological invasions: Recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol. Appl. 16: 2035-2054.
14. Mecteau, M. 2005. Emerald ash borer Canadian program update. Proceedings, XV USDA Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species. http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/20716 (accessed 23 August 2009).
15. Muirhead, J., B. Leung, C. van Overdijk, D. Kelly, K. Nandakumar, K. Marchant, and H. MacIsaac. 2006. Modelling local and long-distance dispersal of invasive emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera) in North America. Divers. Distrib. 12: 71-79.
16. Norgaard, K. M. 2007. The politics of invasive weed management: Gender, race, and risk perception in rural California. Rural Sociol. 72: 450-477.
17. Parkins, J. R., and R. E. Mitchell. 2005. Public participation as public debate: A deliberative turn in national resource management. Society Nat. Resources 18: 529-540.
18. Perrings, C., M. Williamson, E. B. Barbier, D. Delfino, S. Dalmazzone, J. Shogren, P. Simmons, and A. Watkinson. 2002. Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective. Conserv. Ecol. 6. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss1/art1 (accessed 23 August 2009).
19. Poland, T., and D. McCullough. 2006. Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America's ash resource. J. For. 104: 118-124.
20. Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23: 393-404.
21. Sharov, A. A., and A. M. Liebhold. 1998. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol. Appl. 8: 833-845.
22. Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society Nat. Resources 14: 239-249.
23. Stokes, K. E., K. P. O'Neill, W. I. Montgomery, J. T. A. Dick, C. A. Maggs, and R. A. McDonald. 2006. The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: A cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodiv. Conserv. 15: 2829-2852.
24. van Brenk, D. 2004a. Ash-cutting project finished, officials say. London Free Press, April 1.
25. van Brenk, D. 2004b. Protesters step up opposition. London Free Press, February 19.
26. Wondelleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.