Diversity and abundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in forestomach of alpacas (Lama pacos) and sheep (Ovis aries)

Anaerobe

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 426-432

  Pei, Cai Xia ^a   Liu, Qiang ^a   Dong, Chang Sheng ^a   Li, HongQuan ^a   Jiang, Jun Bing ^a   Gao, Wen Jun ^a  

^a SHANXI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Abundance; Alpacas; Forestomach bacteria; Molecular diversity; Sheep

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ANAEROVORAX ODORIMUTANS; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; BIFIDOBACTERIUM INDICUM; CAMEL; CLOSTRIDIACEAE; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLOBIOPARUM; CLOSTRIDIUM COCCOIDES; CLOSTRIDIUM ORBISCINDENS; CLOSTRIDIUM PROTEOCLASTICUM; CLOSTRIDIUM TERMITIDIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPHAGA; DESULFOTOMACULUM; EUBACTERIUM; EUBACTERIUM SIRAEUM; EUBACTERIUM VENTRIOSUM; FORESTOMACH; GENE LIBRARY; GENE SEQUENCE; INTESTINE FLORA; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MOGIBACTERIUM NEGLECTUM; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PALUDIBACTER PROPIONICIGENES; PARAPREVOTELLA CLARA; PELOTOMACULUM; PHYLOGENY; PREVOTELLA RUMINICOLA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SHEEP; TREPONEMA BRYANTII; TREPONEMA ZIOLECKII; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BACTERIAL LOAD; BIODIVERSITY; CAMELIDS, NEW WORLD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; GENE LIBRARY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SHEEP, DOMESTIC; STOMACH;

ANAEROVORAX ODORIMUTANS; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BIFIDOBACTERIUM INDICUM; CLOSTRIDIACEAE; CLOSTRIDIUM BOLTEAE; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLOBIOPARUM; CLOSTRIDIUM COCCOIDES; CLOSTRIDIUM ORBISCINDENS; CLOSTRIDIUM PROTEOCLASTICUM; CLOSTRIDIUM TERMITIDIS; CYTOPHAGA SP. DEX80-37; DESULFOTOMACULUM SP.; EUBACTERIUM SIRAEUM; EUBACTERIUM SP.; EUBACTERIUM VENTRIOSUM; LAMA PACOS; MEDICAGO SATIVA; MOGIBACTERIUM NEGLECTUM; OVIS ARIES; PALUDIBACTER PROPIONICIGENES; PELOTOMACULUM SP. FP; PREVOTELLA RUMINICOLA; TREPONEMA BRYANTII; TREPONEMA ZIOLECKII;

EID: 77956058863     PISSN: 10759964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Avgustin G., Wright F., Flint H.J. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among strains of Prevotella (Bacteroides) ruminicola from the rumen. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994, 44:246-255.
2. Brulca J.M., Antonopoulos D.A., Miller M.E.B., Wilson M.K., Yannarell A.C., Dinsdale E.A., et al. Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. PNAS 2009, 106:1948-1953.
3. Bryant M.P. Bacterial species of the rumen. Bacteriol Rev 1959, 23:125-153.
4. Bryant M.P., Barrentine B.F., Sykes J.F., Robinson I.M., Shawver C.V., Williams L.W. Predominant bacteria in the rumen of cattle on bloat-provoking Ladino clover pasture. J Dairy Sci 1960, 43:1435-1444.
5. Bryant M.P., Robinson I.M., Lindahl I.L. A note on the flora and fauna in the rumen of steers fed a feedlot bloat-provoking ration and the effect of penicillin. Appl Microbiol 1961, 9:511-515.
6. Clemens E.T., Stevens C.E. A comparison of gastrointestinal transit time in ten species of mammal. J Agric Sci, Camb 1980, 94:735-737.
7. Dawson K.A., Rasmussen M.A., Allison M.J. Digestive disorders and nutritional toxicity. The rumen microbial ecosystem 1997, 633-660. Blackie Academic and Professional Publishers, London. P.N. Hobson, C.S. Stewart (Eds.).
8. Denman S.E., McSweeney C.S. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006, 58:572-582.
9. Dulphy J.P., Dardillat C., Jailler M., Ballet J.M. Comparative study of forestomach digestion in llamas and sheep. Reprod Nutri Dev 1997, 37:709-725.
10. Edwards J.E., McEwan N.R., Travis A.J., Wallace R.J. 16S rDNA library-based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2004, 86:263-281.
11. Gutierrez J., Davis R.E., Lindahl I.L. Bacterial changes in the rumen during the onset of feed-lot bloat of cattle and characteristics of Peptostreptococcus elsdenii n. sp. Appl Microbiol 1959, 7:16-22.
12. Gutierrez J., Davis R.E., Lindahl I.L. Characteristics of saponin-utilizing bacteria from the rumen of cattle. Appl Microbiol 1959, 7:304-308.
13. Harrison D.G., Beever D.E., Thompson D.H., Osbourn D.F. Manipulation of rumen fermentation in sheep by increasing the rate of flow of water from the rumen. J Agric Sci, Camb 1975, 85:93-101.
14. Heller R.V., Gregory P.C., Engelhardt Wv Pattern of motility and flow of digesta in the forestomach of the llama (Lama guanicoe F. glama). J Comp Physiol, B 1984, 154:529-533.
15. Hespel R.B., Bryant M.P. Efficiency of rumen microbial growth influence of some theoretical and experimental factors on YATP. J Anim Sci 1979, 49:1640-1659.
16. Hobson P.N. Introduction. The rumen microbial ecosystem 1997, 1-9. Blackie Academic and Professional Publishers, London. P.N. Hobson, C.S. Stewart (Eds.).
17. Isaacson H.R., Hinds F.C., Bryant M.P., Owens F.N. Efficiency of energy utilization by mixed rumen bacteria in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci 1975, 58:1645-1659.
18. Jacobson D.R., Lindahl I.L., McNeill J.J., Shaw J.C., Doetsch R.N., Davis R.E. Feedlot bloat studies. II. Physical factors involved in the etiology of frothy bloat. J Anim Sci 1957, 16:515-524.
19. Jouany J.P. The digestion in camelids: a comparison to ruminants. INRA Prod Anim 2000, 13:165-176. [Abstr. in English].
20. Lemosquet S., Dardillat C., Jailler M., Dulphy J.P. Voluntary intake and gastric digestion of two hays by llamas and sheep: influence of concentrate supplementation. J Agric Sci, Camb 1996, 127:539-548.
21. Lippke H., Reaves J.L., Jacobson N.L. Rumen pressures associated with the scores of a bloat severity scale. J Anim Sci 1972, 34:171-175.
22. Liu Q., Dong C.S., Li H.Q., Yang W.Z., Jiang J.B., Gao W.J., et al. Forestomach fermentation characteristics and diet digestibility in alpacas (Lama pacos) and sheep (Ovis aries) fed two forage diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009, 154:151-159.
23. Majak W., Hall J.W., McCaughey W.P. Pasture management strategies for reducing the risk of legume bloat in cattle. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:1493-1498.
24. Maloy G.M. Comparative studies on digestion and fermentation rates in the forestomach of the one-humped camel and the zebu steer. Res Vet 1972, 13:476-481.
25. Meyer R.M., Bartley E.E. Bloat in cattle. XVI. Development and application of techniques for selecting drugs to prevent feedlot bloat. J Anim Sci 1972, 34:234-240.
26. Ouwerkerk D., Klieve A.V., Forster R.J., Templeton J.M., Maguire A.J. Characterization of culturable anaerobic bacteria from the forestomach of an eastern grey kangaroo, Macropus giganteus. Lett Appl Microbiol 2005, 41:327-333.
27. Russell J.B., Wilson D.B. Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?. J Dairy Sci 1996, 79:1503-1509.
28. San Martin F. Comparative forage selectivity and nutrition of South American camelids and sheep. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX; 1987. p. 146.
29. San Martin F., Bryant F.C. Nutrition of domestic South American llamas and alpacas. Small Rumin Res 1989, 2:191-216.
30. Schloss P.D., Handelsman J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microb 2005, 71:1501-1506.
31. Stewart C.S., Flint H.J., Bryant M.P. The rumen bacteria. The rumen microbial ecosystem 1997, 10-72. Blackie Academic and Professional Publishers, London. P.N. Hobson, C.S. Stewart (Eds.).
32. Sun Y.Z., Mao S.Y., Yao W., Zhu W.Y. DGGE and 16S rDNA analysis reveals a highly diverse and rapidly colonising bacterial community on different substrates in the rumen of goats. Animal 2008, 2:391-398.
33. Whitford M.F., Forster R.J., Beard C.E. Phylogenetic analysis of rumen bacteria by comparative sequence analysis of cloned 16S rRNA genes. Anaerobe 1998, 4:153-163.
34. Zoetendal E.G., Akkermans A.D., De Vos W.M. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Appl Environ Microb 1998, 64:3854-3859.