Beyond the merely visual: Interacting with digital objects in interdisciplinary scientific practice

Semiotica

Volumn 2010, Issue 181, 2010, Pages 127-147

  Monteiro, Marko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Computer modeling; Digital technologies; Gesture; Interaction; Scientific practice; Visual representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956047702     PISSN: 00371998     EISSN: 16133692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/semi.2010.039     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Alač, M. 2008. Working with brain scans: Digital images and gestural interaction in fMRI laboratory. Social Studies of Science 38. 483-508.
2. Alač, M. & E. Hutchins. 2004. I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in MRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4. 629-661.
3. Becvar, L. A., J. Hollan & E. Hutchins. 2005. Hands as molecules: Representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory. Semiotica 156(1/4). 89-112.
4. Bement Jr., A. 2007. Cyberinfrastructure visions for twenty-first century discovery. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/ nsf0728.pdf (accessed 22 March 2010).
5. Chadarevian, S. d. & N. Hopwood. 2004. Models: The third dimension of science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6. Corrie, B. & M.-A. Storey. 2007. Toward understanding the importance of gesture in distributed scientific collaboration. Knowledge and Information Systems 13. 143-171.
7. Daston, L. & P. Galison. 1990. The image of objectivity. Representations 40. 81-128.
8. Francoeur, E. & J. Segal. 2004. From model kits to interactive computer graphics. In S. d. Chadarevian & N. Hopwood (eds.), Models: The third dimension of science, 402-433. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9. Goodwin, C. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96. 606-633.
10. Hopwood, N. & S. d. Chadarevian. 2004. Dimensions of modeling. In S. d. Chadarevian & N. Hopwood (eds.), Models: The third dimension of science, 1-15. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11. Knorr-Cetina, K. & K. Amann. 1990. Image dissection in natural scientific inquiry. Science, Technology and Human Values 15. 259-283.
12. Kraut, R. E., S. R. Fussell & J. Siegel. 2003. Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction 18. 13-49.
13. Kwan, M.-P. 2002. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92. 645-661.
14. Kwan, M.-P. 2007. Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. Professional Geographer 59. 22-34.
15. Latour, B. 1990. Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in scientific practice, 19-68. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Latour, B. 1995. The "pedofil" of Boa Vista: A photo-philosophical montage. Common Knowledge 4. 144-187.
17. Latour, B. & S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Lynch, M. 1990. The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in scientific practice, 153-186. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Lynch, M. 2006. The production of scientific images: Vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy and sociology of science. In L. Pauwels (ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication, 26-41. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.
20. Lynch, M. & S. Woolgar. 1990. Introduction: Sociological orientations to representational practice in science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar, Representation in scientific practice, 1-19. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Monteiro, M. & E. Keating. 2009. Managing misunderstandings: The role of language in interdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Science Communication 31(1). 6-28.
22. Myers, N. 2008. Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science 38. 163-199.
23. Ochs, E., S. Jacoby & P. Gonzales. 1994. Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations 2. 151-171.
24. Ochs, E., S. Jacoby & P. Gonzales. 1996. "When I come down I'm in the domain state": Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physics. In E. Ochs, E. Schlegloff & S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 328-369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Pasveer, B. 2006. Representing or mediating: A history and philosophy of x-ray images in medicine. In L. Pauwels (ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication, 41-63. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.
26. Pauwels, L. 2006a. A theoretical framework for assessing visual representational practices in knowledge building and science communications. In L. Pauwels (ed.), Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication, 1-26. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.
27. Schnalke, T. 2004. Casting skin: Meanings for doctors, artists, and patients. In S. d. Chadarevian & N. Hopwood (eds.), Models: The third dimension of science, 207-242. Stanford: Stanford University Press.