Employment maintenance and the factors that impact it after vocational rehabilitation and return to work

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 1621-1632

  Young, Amanda E ^a  

^a LIBERTY MUTUAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SAFETY   (United States)

Author keywords

participation barriers and facilitators; rehabilitation; Return to work

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORKMAN COMPENSATION; WORKPLACE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTITUDE; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; WORKERS' COMPENSATION; WORKPLACE;

EID: 77956045598     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638281003611029     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Subramanian A, Desai A, Prakash L, Mital A. Changing trends in US injury profiles: revisiting non-fatal occupational injury statistics. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:123-155.
2. Marisol Concha-Barrientos DIN, Fingerhut M, Driscoll T, Leigh J. The global burden due to occupational injury. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:470-481.
3. Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ. Research and practice directions in risk for disability prediction and early intervention. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims. NY: Pringer; 2005. pp 523-551.
4. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occupat Rehab 2005;15:557-568.
5. Wasiak R, Kim J, Pransky G. Work disability and costs caused by recurrence of low back pain: longer and more costly than in first episodes. Spine 2006;31:219-225.
6. Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L. The evolution of compensated occupational spinal injuries. A three-year follow-up study. Spine 1992;17:1043-1047.
7. Gross DP, Battie MC. Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers' compensation setting. J Occupat Environ Med 2005;47:428-433.
8. Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Hogg-Johnson S. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes - a prospective study. Can Med Assoc J 2002;166:749-754.
9. Schonherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, Schoppen T, Eisma WH. Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord 2004;42:177-184.
10. Abenhaim L, Suissa S, Rossignol M. Risk of recurrence of occupational back pain over three year follow up. Br J Ind Med 1988;45:829-833.
11. Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occupat Environ Med 2004;46:68-76.
12. Lotters F, Hogg-Johnson S, Burdorf A. Health status, its perceptions, and effect on return to work and recurrent sick leave. Spine 2005;30:1086-1092.
13. Burdorf A, Jansen JP. Predicting the long term course of low back pain and its consequences for sickness absence and associated work disability. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:522-529.
14. Gross DP, Battie MC. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: sustained recovery. Spine 2004;29:920-924.
15. MurphyG,YoungA.Returntowork following spinal cord injury: interruptions the continuity of employment gained post-injury; 2001, 30 May-1 June. Surfers Paradise, Australia: Australian Society of Rehabilitation Counsellors.
16. Vercillo A. Job retention success for individuals receiving vocational services after a work-related injury. Boston: Boston University; 2008.
17. Young AE. Return-to-work experiences: Prior to receiving vocational services. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:2013-2022.
18. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR; 2008.
19. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
20. Stamm T, Machold K. The international classification of functioning, disability and health in practice in rheumatological care and research. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007;19:184-189.
21. Duggan CH, Albright KJ, Lequerica A. Using the ICF to code and analyse women's disability narratives. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:978-990.
22. Sundar V, Daumen ME, Conley DJ, Stone JH. The use of ICF codes for information retrieval in rehabilitation research: an empirical study. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:955-962.
23. Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13:129-142.
24. Lotters F, Meerding WJ, Burdorf A. Reduced productivity after sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders and its relation to health outcomes. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31:367-374.
25. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:817-823.
26. LysaghtRM, Larmour-Trode S.An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process.Work 2008;30:255-266.
27. Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D.Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101-2114.
28. Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:766-781.
29. Tsaousides T, Ashman T, Seter C. The psychological effects of employment after traumatic brain injury: objective and subjective indicators. Rehabil Psychol 2008;53:456-463.
30. Levack W, McPherson K, McNaughton H. Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: are we evaluating what is most important? Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:290-298.
31. Young AE, Murphy GC. A social psychology approach to measuring vocational rehabilitation intervention effectiveness. J Occup Rehab 2002;12:175-189.
32. Kenny D. The role of rehabiliation providers in occupational rehabilitation: providing for whom? Part 1: Self-perception. Aust J Rehab Counsel 1998;4:97-110.
33. Campbell Research and Consulting. National return-to-work monitor 1999/2000. Melbourne: Campbell; 2000.
34. Westmorland MG, Buys N. A comparison of disability management practices in Australian and Canadian workplaces. Work 2004;23:31-41.
35. Office for National Statistics. Standard occupational classification 2000. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
36. Office of Management and Budget. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. Washington, DC: Government Print Office; 1987.
37. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational injury and illness classification manual. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 1992.
38. United States. BLS handbook of methods. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1997.