Return-to-work experiences: Prior to receiving vocational services

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 2013-2022

  Young, Amanda E ^a  

^a LIBERTY MUTUAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SAFETY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability recurrence; ICF; Return to work; Vocational rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMPLOYMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK EXPERIENCE; WORKPLACE;

DISABLED PERSONS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; WORK SCHEDULE TOLERANCE; WORKERS' COMPENSATION;

EID: 70449087185     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638280902887412     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehab 2005;15:557-568.
2. Galizzi M, Boden L. What are the most important factors shaping return to work? Evidence from Wisconsin. Cambridge, MA: Workers Compensation Research Institute; 1996.
3. Campolieti M, Krashinsky H. Wage losses of workers with occupational injuries: Effects of remaining with the time-of-accident employer. Indust Labor Relat Rev 2006; 60:120-138.
4. Strunin L, Boden LI. Paths of reentry: employment experiences of injured workers. Am J Ind Med 2000;38:373-384.
5. Wasiak R, Verma S, Pransky G, Webster B. Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: case of low back pain. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:68-76.
6. Bryman A, Teevan J. Social research methods: Canadian edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
7. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 5th ed. Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR; 2008.
8. Fenig S, Levav I, Kohn R, Yelin N. Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey. Am J Public Health 1993;83:896-898.
9. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. ICF, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
10. MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32:257-269.
11. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Phychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Indust Med 2001;40:374-392.
12. McGeary DD, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ. High pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88: 317-325.
13. Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fatouhi C, Himmelstein Fletcher KE, Katz J, Johnson W. Outcomes in work-related upper extremity and low back injuries: Results of a retrospective study. Am J Indust Med 2000;37:400-409.
14. Dasinger LK, Krause N, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42:323-333.
15. Gard G, Sandberg AC. Motivating factors for return to work. Physiotherapy Res Int 1998;3:100-108.
16. Stamm TA, Nell V, Mathis M, Coenen M, Aletaha D, Cieza A, et al. Concepts important to patients with psoriatic arthritis are not adequately covered by standard measures of functioning. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:487-494.
17. Stamm TA, Cieza A, Coenen M, Machold KP, Nell VP, Smolen JS, et al. Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis from the patient perspective: a qualitative study. Arthritis Rheum 2005;53:431-439.
18. Adamson J, Gooberman-Hill R, Woolhead G, Donovan J. 'Questerviews': using questionnaires in qualitative interviews as a method of integrating qualitative and quantitative health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004;9:139-145.
19. Dawson E, Kanim L, Parveen S, Dorey F. Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: Outcomes analysis. Spine 2002;27:984-994.
20. Keeter S, Kennedy C, Dimock M, Best J, Craighill P. Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Pub Opin Quart 2006;70:759-779.
21. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Response rates-an overview. Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR; 2006.
22. Office for National Statistics. Standard Occupational Classification 2000. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
23. Office of Management and Budget. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. Washington, DC: Govt. Print. Off. 1987.
24. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Injury and Illness Classification Manual. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 1992.