Development and validation of the function in sitting test in adults with acute stroke

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 150-160

  Gorman, Sharon L ^a   Radtka, Sandra ^b   Melnick, Marsha E ^b   Abrams, Gary M ^c   Byl, Nancy N ^c  

^a SAMUEL MERRITT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

balance measurement; postural control; sitting balance; stroke

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; STROKE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTURAL BALANCE; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE;

EID: 77956037697     PISSN: 15570576     EISSN: 15570584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181f0065f     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Goodman C, Fuller K. Pathology: Implications for the Physical Therapist. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2008.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Stroke facts and statistics http://www.cdc.gov/Stroke/facts.htm. Published February 12, 2009. Accessed March 4, 2009.
3. MacKnight CR. Mobility and balance in the elderly: a guide to bedside assessment. Postgrad Med. 1996;99(3):944-945.
4. Bohannon RW, Smith MB, Larkin PA. Relationship between independent sitting balance and side of hemiparesis. Phys Ther. 1986;66(6): 944-945.
5. Bloem BR, Valkenburg VV, Slabbekoorn M, GertvanDijk J. The multiple tasks test. Strategies in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res. 2001;137: 478-486.
6. Alexander NB, Grunawalt JC, Carlos S, Augustine J. Bed mobility task performance in older adults. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:633-638.
7. Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1206-1212.
8. Wade DT, Hewer RL,Wood VA. Therapy after stroke: amounts, determinants and effects. Int Rehabil Med. 1984;6(3):105-110.
9. Lynch SM, Leahy P, Barker S. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 1998;78:128-133.
10. Uitenbroek D. SISA binomial. http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/ statistics/correl.htm. Accessed March 4, 2009.
11. Lewis C. The Functional Tool Box II: Clinical Measures of Functional Outcomes. Washington, D.C.: LEARN Publications; 1997.
12. Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Ricupero C, Martino MT. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Stroke. 1997;28:1382-1385.
13. Huxham FE, Goldie PA, Patla AE. Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47:89-100.
14. Duncan P. Duke Mobility Skills Profile.Center forHuman Aging. Durham, NC: Duke University; 1989.
15. Winograd C, Lemsky C, Nevitt M, et al. Development of a physical performance and mobility examination. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42: 743-749.
16. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Merin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, DeWeerdtW. The trunk impairment scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:326-334.
17. Simondson J, Goldie P, Brock K, Nosworthy J. The Mobility Scale for acute stroke patients: intrarater and interrater reliability. Clin Rehabil. 1996;10:295-300.
18. Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scad J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
19. Collen F,Wade D, Robb G, Bradshaw C. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13:50-54.
20. Carr J, Shepard R, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65: 175-180.
21. Tinetti M. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:119-126.
22. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD Med J. 1965;14:61.
23. Center for Health Services and Policy Research. OASIS-B. Denver, CO: Center for Health Services and Policy Research; 1997.
24. Shumway-Cook A, Wollocott MH. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
25. Sandin KJ, Smith BS. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke. 1990;21:82-86.
26. van Nes I, Neinhuis B, Latour H, Geurts A. Posturographic assessment of sitting balance recovery in the subacute phase of stroke. Gait Posture. 2008;28(3):507-512.
27. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM Instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
28. Guccione A, Scalzitti D. Examination of functional status and activity level. In: O'Sullivan S, Schmitz TJ, eds. Physical Rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 2007:373-400.
29. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making. 2nd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
30. Nichols DS, Miller L, Colby LA, Pease WS. Sitting balance: its relation to function in individuals with hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:865-869.
31. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Pedersen PM, Houth J, Olsen TS. Functional and neurological outcome of stroke and the relation to stroke severity and type, stroke unit treatment, body temperature, age, and other risk factors: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2000;6(4):1-19.
32. Horton AM, Manley SB. On the decline: company reports decreasing rehab services under PPS. Adv Dir Rehabil. 2000.
33. Kettenbach G. Writing SOAP Notes. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 2004.
34. Kwakkel G,Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in a stroke: a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25:476-489.
35. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke. 1990;21:82-86.
36. Agarwal V, McRae PM, Bhardwaj A, Teasell RW. A model to aid in the prediction of discharge location for stroke rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1703-1709.
37. Hashimoto K, Highuchi K, Nakayama Y, Abo M. Ability for basic movement as an early predictor of functioning related to activities of daily living in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:353-357.
38. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, et al. Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;78:694-698.
39. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley AB, Tallis RC. The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke: predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:341-346.
40. Meijer R, VanLimbeek J, Peusens G, Rulkens M. The Stroke Unit Discharge Guideline, a prognostic framework for discharge outcome from the hospital stroke unit. A prospective cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:770-778.
41. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scan J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:27-36.
42. Bonita R, Beaglehof R. Modification of the Rankin Scale: recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497-1500.
43. Domholdt E. Rehabilitation Research: Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
44. Rathore SS, Hinn AR, Cooper LS, Tyroler HA, Rosamond WD. Characterization of incident stroke signs and symptoms: findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Stroke. 2002;33:2718-2721.
45. Portney LG,WatkinsMP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2008.
46. McMillan J, Schumacher S. Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry. 6th ed: Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
47. Wright B, Masters G. Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1982.
48. Wilson M, Allen D, Li J. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: introducing item response modeling. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(suppl 1):i4-i18.
49. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Weerdt W. Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(5):387-394.
50. Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF Model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82(11): 1098-1107.
51. Johnson L, Selfe J. Measurement ofmobility following stroke: a comparison of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index and theMotor Assessment Scale. Physiotherapy. 2004;90(3):132-138.