A common computational framework for semiring-based argumentation systems

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 215, Issue , 2010, Pages 131-136

  Bistarelli, Stefano ^a   Santini, Francesco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PERUGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK; CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION PROBLEMS; PREFERENCE LEVEL; PROBABILITY LEVELS; QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORKS; SEMI-RING; SOFT CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; SOLUTION TECHNIQUES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 77956032975     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, 'Inferring from inconsistency in preferencebased argumentation frameworks', J. Autom. Reasoning, 29(2), 125-169, (2002).
2. T. J. M. Bench-Capon, 'Persuasion in practical argument using valuebased argumentation frameworks', J. Log. Comput., 13(3), 429-448, (2003).
3. S. Bistarelli, Semirings for Soft Constraint Solving and Programming, volume 2962 of LNCS, Springer, 2004.
4. S. Bistarelli, F. Gadducci, J. Larrosa, and E. Rollon, 'A soft approach to multi-objective optimization', in Conference on Logic Programming, ICLP 2008, volume 5366, pp. 764-768. Springer, (2008).
5. S. Bistarelli, U. Montanari, and F. Rossi, 'Soft concurrent constraint programming', ACM Trans. Comput. Logic, 7(3), 563-589, (2006).
6. S. Bistarelli, U. Montanari, and F. Rossi, 'Semiring-based Constraint Solving and Optimization', Journal of the ACM, 44(2), 201-236, (March 1997).
7. S. Bistarelli, D. Pirolandi, and F. Santini, 'Solving weighted argumentation frameworks with soft constraints', Technical report, Dipartimento di Scienze, Universit̀a G. d'Annunzio, Pescara, (December 2009). Number R-2009-003, http://www.sci.unich.it/ ~tecrep/2009/R-2009-003.pdf.
8. M. Caminada, 'Semi-stable semantics', in COMMA: Computational Models of Argument, volume 144, pp. 121-130. IOS Press, (2006).
9. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, S. Konieczny, M. Lagasquie-Schiex, and P. Marquis, 'On the merging of dung's argumentation systems', Artif. Intell., 171(10-15), 730-753, (2007).
10. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, and P. Marquis, 'Constrained argumentation frameworks', in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 112-122. AAAI Press, (2006).
11. P. M. Dung, 'On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games', Artif. Intell., 77(2), 321-357, (1995).
12. P. E. Dunne, A. Hunter, P. McBurney, S. Parsons, and M. Wooldridge, 'Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems', in AAMAS '09: Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 851-858. Int. Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (2009).
13. R. Haenni, 'Probabilistic argumentation', J. Applied Logic, 7(2), 155-176, (2009).
14. J. Janssen, M. De Cock, and D. Vermeir, 'Fuzzy argumentation frameworks', in Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, pp. 513-520, (2008).
15. S. Modgil, 'Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks', Artif. Intell., 173(9-10), 901-934, (2009).
16. J. L. Pollock, 'Justification and defeat', Artif. Intell., 67(2), 377-407, (1994).
17. F. Rossi, P. van Beek, and T. Walsh, Handbook of Constraint Programming, Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2006.
18. M. Schroeder and R. Schweimeier, 'Fuzzy argumentation for negotiating agents', in AAMAS, pp. 942-943. ACM, (2002).
19. G. Vreeswijk, 'Abstract argumentation systems', Artif. Intell., 90(1-2), 225-279, (1997).