In-vivo assessment of a novel polymer (SIBS) trileaflet heart valve

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 499-505

  Wang, Qiang ^a   McGoron, Anthony J ^a   Bianco, Richard ^b   Kato, Yasushi ^c   Pinchuk, Leonard ^c   Schoephoerster, Richard T ^d  

^a Florida International University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Innovia LLC   (United States)

^d 500 W University Avenue   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMYRISTOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; POLY(STYRENE BLOCK ISOBUTYLENE BLOCK STYRENE); POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BIOMATERIAL; POLY(STYRENE-B-ISOBUTYLENE-B-STYRENE); STYRENE DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CALCIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MATERIALS TESTING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SHEEP; TRILEAFLET HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA VALVE; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; PROSTHESIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGERY; TIME;

ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DIMYRISTOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, ANIMAL; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SHEEP; STYRENES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77956022268     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hyde JA, Chinn JA, Phillips RE, Jr. Polymer heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:331-339
2. Wheatley DJ, Raco L, Bernacca GM, Sim I, Belcher PR, Boyd JS. Polyurethane: Material for the next generation of heart valve prostheses? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:440-448
3. Mackay TG, Wheatley DJ, Bernacca GM, Fisher AC, Hindle CS. New polyurethane heart valve prosthesis: Design, manufacture and evaluation. Biomaterials 1996;17:1857-1863
4. Daebritz SH, Fausten B, Hermanns B, et al. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:946-952 (Pubitemid 38622333)
5. Bernacca GM, Mackay TG, Gulbransen MJ, Donn AW, Wheatley DJ. Polyurethane heart valve durability: Effects of leaflet thickness and material. Int J Artif Organs 1997;20:327-331
6. Bernacca GM, Straub I, Wheatley DJ. Mechanical and morphological study of biostable polyurethane heart valve leaflets explanted from sheep. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:138-145 (Pubitemid 34650266)
7. El Fray M, Prowans P, Puskas JE, Altstadt V. Biocompatibility and fatigue properties of polystyrene-polyisobutylene-polystyrene, an emerging thermoplastic elastomeric biomaterial. Biomacromolecules 2006;7:844-850
8. Pinchuk L, Wilson GJ, Barry JJ, Schoephoerster RT, Parel JM, Kennedy JP. Medical applications of poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) ('SIBS'). Biomaterials 2008;29:448-460
9. Boden M, Richard R, Schwarz MC, Kangas S, Huibregtse B, Barry JJ. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the safety and stability of the Taxus paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20:1553-1562
10. Sacks MS, Smith DB. Effects of accelerated testing on porcine bioprosthetic heart valve fiber architecture. Biomaterials 1998;19:1027-1036
11. De Hart J, Cacciola G, Schreurs PJ, Peters GW. A three-dimensional analysis of a fiber-reinforced aortic valve prosthesis. J Biomech 1998;31:629-638
12. Gallocher S, Datye A, Wu KH, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT. Effect of leaflet anisotropy, coaptation curvature, and stent flexibility on the stress concentrations and in vitro function of polymer trileaflet heart valves. Proceedings of the 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Marco Island, Florida. ASME, New York, 2009
13. Wang Q, McGoron AJ, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT. A novel small animal model for biocompatibility assessment of polymeric materials for use in prosthetic heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:442-453
14. Duraiswamy N, Choksi TD, Pinchuk L, Schoephoerster RT. A phospholipid-modified polystyrene-polyisobutylene-polystyrene (SIBS) triblock polymer for enhanced hemocompatibility and potential use in artificial heart valves. J Biomater Appl 2009;23:367-379
15. Replacement Heart Valve Guidance for Data to be Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration in Support of Applications for Premarket Approval. FDA, Rockville, Maryland, 1994
16. ISO 5840 Cardiovascular Implants-Cardiac Valve Prostheses. International Standard Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005
17. Karimi H, Moghaddam GA, Naematollahi A, Rezazadeh F. In vitro ultrasonography of the normal sheep heart. Pakistan Vet J 2008;28:92-94
18. Gray H. Gray's Anatomy: The Classic Collector's Edition. 15th edition. Gramercy Books, New York, 1988
19. Thubrikar M, Piepgrass WC, Deck JD, Nolan SP. Stresses of natural versus prosthetic aortic valve leaflets in vivo. Ann Thorac Surg 1980;30:230-239 (Pubitemid 10048368)
20. Deck JD, Thubrikar MJ, Schneider PJ, Nolan SP. Structure, stress, and tissue repair in aortic valve leaflets. Cardiovasc Res 1988;22:7-16
21. Hagerty RD, Salzmann DL, Kleinert LB, Williams SK. Cellular proliferation and macrophage populations associated with implanted expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and polyethylene terephthalate. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:489-497
22. Bernacca GM, Mackay TG, Wilkinson R, Wheatley DJ. Calcification and fatigue failure in a polyurethane heart value. Biomaterials 1995;16:279-285
23. Bernacca GM, Mackay TG, Wilkinson R, Wheatley DJ. Polyurethane heart valves: Fatigue failure, calcification, and polyurethane structure. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:371-379
24. Alferiev I, Stachelek SJ, Lu Z, et al. Prevention of polyurethane valve cusp calcification with covalently attached bisphosphonate diethylamino moieties. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:385-395
25. Eriksson C, Lausmaa J, Nygren H. Interactions between human whole blood and modified TiO2-surfaces: Influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials 2001;22:1987-1996 (Pubitemid 32567635)
26. Ishihara K, Nomura H, Mihara T, Kurita K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Why do phospholipid polymers reduce protein adsorption? J Biomed Mater Res A 1998;39:323-330
27. Allen LT, Tosetto M, Miller IS, et al. Surface-induced changes in protein adsorption and implications for cellular phenotypic responses to surface interaction. Biomaterials 2006;27:3096-3108