Identification of bottleneck enzymes with negative dynamic sensitivities: Ethanol fermentation systems as case studies

Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 191-200

  Sriyudthsak, K ^a   Shiraishi, F ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamic logarithmic gain; Ethanol fermentation; Metabolic bottleneck; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE VALUES; DYNAMIC SENSITIVITY; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTERS; GROWTH SYSTEMS; IMMOBILISATION; IMMOBILISED CELLS; INTEGRATED VALUES; INTRACELLULAR REACTIONS; MEMBRANE-BOUND; METABOLIC BOTTLENECK; METABOLITE CONCENTRATIONS; NEGATIVE REGIONS; NEGATIVE VALUES; PHOSPHOFRUCTOKINASE; REACTION PERIOD; TIME COURSE; TIME VARYING; WORK STUDY;

CATALYSTS; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; GROWTH KINETICS; METABOLISM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ENZYMES;

ALCOHOL; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER; GLYCERALDEHYDE 3 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASES; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 77956011664     PISSN: 01681656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berrada A.A., Tomita T., Hirayama H., Shiraishi F. Simplification of a radical reaction model based on dynamic sensitivity analysis: Evaluation of SoftCADS performance. Eco-Engineering 2009, 21(3):95-101.
2. Brink Jvd, Daran-Lapujade P., Pronk J.T., Winde JHd. New insights into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation switch: Dynamic transcriptional response to anaerobicity and glucose-excess. BMC Genomics 2008, 9. 100.
3. Cascante M., Curto R., Sorribas A. Comparative characterization of the fermentation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using biochemical systems theory and metabolic control analysis: Steady-state analysis. Math. Biosci. 1995, 130:51-69.
4. Curto R., Sorribas A., Cascante M. Comparative characterization of the fermentation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using biochemical systems theory and metabolic control analysis: Model definition and nomenclature. Math. Biosci. 1995, 130:25-50.
5. Curto R., Sorribas A., Cascante M. Comparative characterization of the fermentation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using biochemical systems theory and metabolic control analysis: Model definition and nomenclature. Math. Biosci. 1995, 130:25-50.
6. D'Souza S.F., Nadkarni G.B. Immobilized catalase-containing yeast cells: Preparation and enzymatic properties. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, 22:2191-2205.
7. Diderich JA, Schepper M, Hoek Pv, Luttik MAH, Dijken JPv, Pronk JT, Klaassen P, Boelens HFM, Mattos MJTd, Dam Kv and others. 1999. Glucose uptake kinetics and transcription of HXT genes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol.Chem. 274(22):15350-15359.
8. Galazzo JL. 1988. Effects of cell entrapment in Ca-alginate on the metabolism of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PhD Dissertation, California Institute of Technology.
9. Galazzo J.L., Bailey J.E. Fermentation pathway kinetics and metabolic flux control in suspended and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1990, 12:162-172.
10. Galazzo J.L., Bailey J.E. Fermentation pathway kinetics and metabolic flux control in suspended and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Errata. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1991, 13:363.
11. Hirayama H, Nishikawa S, Shiraishi F. 2006. Performance of numerical computation of the differential equations by taylor series. IPSJ SIG Technical Reports 106(HPC-108):61-66.
12. Liao J.C., Lightfoot E.N.J., Jolly S.O., Jacobson G.K. Application of characteristic reaction paths: Rate-limiting capability of phosphofructokinase in yeast fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1988, 31:855-868.
13. Luong J.H.T. Kinetics of ethanol inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985, 27:280-285.
14. Morohashi M., Winn A.E., Borisuk M.T., Bolouri H., Doyle J., Kitano H. Robustness as a measure of plausibility in models of biochemical networks. J. Theor. Biol. 2002, 216:19-30.
15. Nanba A., Nishizawa Y., Tsuchiya Y., Nagai S. Kinetic analysis for batch ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ferment. Technol. 1987, 65(3):277-283.
16. Ni T.C., Savageau M.A. Application of biochemical systems theory to metabolism in human red blood cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271(14):7927-7941.
17. Niederberger P., Prasad R., Miozzari G., Kacser H. A strategy for incresing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulations: A tryptophan system of yeast. Biochem. J. 1992, 287:473-479.
18. Pasternak C.A., Aiyathurai J.E.J., Makinde V., Davies A., Baldwin S.A., Konieczko E.M., Windnell C.C. Regulation of glucose uptake by stressed cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 1991, 149:324-331.
19. Rogers P.L., Lee K.J., Tribe D.E. Kinetics of alcohol production by Zymomonas mobilis at high sugar concentrations. Biotechnol. Letters 1979, 1(4):165-170.
20. Savageau M.A. Biochemical systems analysis I. Some mathematical properites of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J. Theor. Biol. 1969, 25:365-369.
21. Savageau M.A. Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the perforemance of biochemical systems. Nature 1971, 229:542-544.
22. Savageau M.A. Biochemical systems theory: Operational differences among variant representations and their significance. J. Theor. Biol. 1991, 151:509-530.
23. Savageau MA. 1992. Power-law formalism: A canonical nonlinear formalism for the analysis of biological systems. World Congress of Nonlinear Analysts' 92:37-42.
24. Schwacke J.H., Voit E.O. Computation and analysis of time-dependent sensitivities in generalized mass action systems. J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 236:21-38.
25. Shiraishi F., Furata S., Ishimatsu T., Akhter J. A simple and highly accurate numerical differentiation method for sensitivity analysis of large-scale metabolic reaction systems. Math. Biosci. 2007, 208:590-606.
26. Shiraishi F., Hatoh Y. Dynamic sensitivities in chaotic dynamical systems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 186(2):1347-1359.
27. Shiraishi F., Hatoh Y., Irie T. An efficient method for calculation of dynamic logarithmic gains in biochemical systems theory. J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 234:79-85.
28. Shiraishi F., Savageau M.A. The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum II. Evaluation of model consistency and robustness. J. Biol. Chem 1992, 267(32):22919-22925.
29. Shiraishi F., Suzuki Y. Method for determination of the main bottleneck enzyme in a metabolic reaction network by dynamic sensitivity analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:415-423.
30. Shiraishi F, Tomita T, Hirayama H. A rapid and highly-reliable method for calculation of dynamic sensitivities in a large-scale metabolic reaction system; 2006; Munchen.
31. Shiraishi F., Tomita T., Iwata M., Berrada A.A. A reliable Taylor series-based computational method for the calculation of dynamic sensitivities in large-scale metabolic reaction systems: Algorithmic and software evaluation. Math. Biosci. 2009, 222(2):73-85.
32. Sorribas A., Curto R., Cascante M. Comparative characterization of the fermentation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using biochemical systems theory and metabolic control analysis: Model validation and dynamic behavior. Math. Biosci. 1995, 130:71-84.
33. Sriyudthsak K, Shiraishi F. 2010. Instantaneous and overall indicators for determination of bottleneck ranking in metabolic reaction networks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. In press.
34. Varma A, Morbidelli M, Wu H. 1999. Parametric sensitivity in chemical systems. Cambridge series in chemical engineering:342 p.
35. Voit EO. 2000. Computational analysis of biochemical systems: A practical guide for biochemists and molecular biologists.531 p.
36. Voit E.O., Savageau M.A. Power-law approach to modeling biological systems II. Application to ethanol production. J. Ferment. Technol 1982, 60(3):229-232.