Future changes in biogenic isoprene emissions: How might they affect regional and global atmospheric chemistry?

Earth Interactions

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1-19

  Wiedinmyer, Christine ^a   Tie, Xuexi ^a   Guenther, Alex ^a   Neilson, Ron ^b   Granier, Claire ^c,d  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^d INSTITUT PIERRE SIMON LAPLACE   (France)

Author keywords

Isoprene emissions; Land cover change; Ozone production

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ISOPRENE; OZONE; VEGETATION;

CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; ISOPRENE EMISSION; LAND-COVER CHANGE; NATURAL VEGETATION; OZONE PRODUCTION; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION; SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATIONS; TROPOSPHERIC OXIDANTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 77955971694     PISSN: 10873562     EISSN: 10873562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/EI174.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alig, R., D. M. Adams, B. A. McCarl, and P. J. Ince, 2000: Economic potential of short-rotation woody crops on agricultural land for pulp fiber production in the United States. For. Prod. J., 50(5), 67-74.
2. Brasseur, G. P., D. A. Hauglustaine, S. Walter, J. F. Muller, P. Rasch, C. Granier, and X. Tie, 1998: MOZART, A global three-dimensional chemical-transport-model of the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 28265-28289.
3. Chameides, W. L., R. W. Lindsay, J. Richardson, and C. S. Kiang, 1988: The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog-Atlanta as a case-study. Science, 241, 1473-1475.
4. Fehsenfeld, F., and Coauthors, 1992: Emissions of volatile organic compounds from vegetation and the implications for atmospheric chemistry. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 6, 389-430.
5. Fiore, A. M., L. W. Horowitz, D. W. Purves, H. Levy II, M. J. Evans, Y. Wang, Q. Li, and R. M. Yantosca, 2005: Evaluating the contribution of changes in isoprene emissions to surface ozone trends over the eastern United States. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12303, doi:10.1029/2004JD005485.
6. Guenther, A., P. Zimmerman, P. Harley, R. K. Monson, and R. Fall, 1993: Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analysis. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 12609-12617.
7. -. and Coauthors, 1995: A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. J. Geophys. Res., 100(D5), 8873-8892.
8. -. C. Geron, T. Pierce, B. Lamb, P. Harley, and R. Fall, 2000: Natural emissions of nonmethane volatile organic compounds; carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen from North America. Atmos. Environ., 34, 2205-2230.
9. 3 and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4784, doi:10.1029/2002JD002853.
10. Kang, D., V. P. Aneja, R. Mathur, and J. D. Ray, 2003: Nonmethane hydrocarbons and ozone in three rural southeast United States national parks: A model sensitivity analysis and comparison to measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4604, doi:10.1029/2002JD003054.
11. Kattenberg, A., and Coauthors, 1996: Climate models-Projections of future climate. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 289-357.
12. 3 production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2299-2302.
13. -. and Coauthors, 1997: Dependence of ozone production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2299-2303.
14. Neilson, R. P., 1995: A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol. Appl., 5, 362-385.
15. -. and R. J. Drapek, 1998: Potentially complex biosphere responses to transient global warming. 6Global Change Biol., 4, 505-521.
16. Petron, G., P. Harley, J. Greenberg, and A. Guenther, 2001: Seasonal temperature variations influence isoprene emission. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1707-1710.
17. 3 modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 103(D19), 25611-25629.
18. Prather, M., and D. Ehhalt, 2001: Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases. Climate Change 2001, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 239-287.
19. Rasch, P. J., N. M. Mahowald, and B. E. Eaton, 1997: Representations of transport, convection, and the hydrologic cycle in chemical transport models: Implications for the modeling of shortlived and soluble species. J. Geophys. Res., 102(D23), 828127-28138.
20. 2 uncouples growth from isoprene emission in an agriforest ecosystem. Nature, 421, 256-259.
21. 3 control strategies. Science, 292, 719-723.
22. 3 levels. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1936, doi:10.1029/2003GL017642.
23. Theobald, D., 2005: Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol. Soc., 10 (1). [Available online at http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art32/.]
24. Tie, X., G. Brasseur, L. Emmons, L. Horowitz, and D. Kinnison, 2001: Effects of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants: A global model study. J. Geophys. Res., 106 D, 22931-22964.
25. -. and Coauthors, 2005: Chemical characterization of air pollution in eastern China and the eastern United States. Atmos. Environ., in press.
26. Turner, D. P., J. V. Baglio, A. G. Wones, D. Pross, R. Vong, B. D. Mcveety, and D. L. Phillips, 1991: Climate change and isoprene emissions from vegetation. Chemosphere, 23(1), 37-56.
27. von Kuhlmann, R., M. G. Lawrence, U. Poschl, and P. J. Crutzen, 2004: Sensitivities in global scale modeling of isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1-17.
28. World Health Organization, 2000: Air quality guidelines for Europe. 2d ed. WHO Regional Office for Europe, WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 91, 32-40. [Available online at http://www.euro.who.int/air/activities/ 20050223-4.]