hTracker: Towards a service provider oriented peer-to-peer architecture

NOTERE'10 - 10th Annual International Conference on New Technologies of Distributed Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 25-32

  Saad, Radwane ^a   Serhrouchni, Ahmed ^a   Chen, Ken ^b  

^a TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

BitTorrent; HMAC; Locality; Peer selection; Performance

Indexed keywords

BITTORRENT; HMAC; LOCALITY; PEER SELECTION; PERFORMANCE;

INTERNET; INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 77955966990     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NOTERE.2010.5536838     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Ipoque. http://ipoque.com/resources/internet-studies/internet-study-2007
2. W. B. Norton, "The evolution of the u.s. internet peering system", 2003.
3. A. R. Bharambe, C. Herley and V. N. Padmanabhan, "Analyzing and Improving a BitTorrent Newtek's Performance Mechanisms", Mars 2005.
4. S. Le Blond, A. Legout and W. Dabbous, "Pushing BitTorrent Locality to the Limit" I.N.R.I.A., France, December 2008.
5. R. Bindal, P. Cao and W. Chan, "Improving Traffic Locality in BitTorrent via Biased Neighbor Selection", ICDCS, February 2006.
6. H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R Canetti, "RFC 2104: HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication", February 1997.
7. B. Cohen, "Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent," in Proc. First Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley, USA June 2003.
8. A. Legout, G. Urvoy-Keller and P. Michiardi, "Understanding BitTorrent: An Experimental Perspective", Institut Eurecom, INRIA, November 2005.
9. "The Official BitTorrent Specification", http://www.BitTorrent. org/.
10. "The Unofficial BitTorrent Protocol Specification vl.0", http://wiki.theory.org/mTorrentSpecffication.
11. A. Legout, G. Urvoy-Keller and P. Michiardi, "Rarest First and Choke Algorithms are enough", Institut Eurecom, June 2006.
12. M. Izal, G. Urvoy-Keller, E.W. Biersack, P.A Felber, A. Al Hamra, and L. Garces-Erice, "Dissecting BitTorrent: Five Months in a Torrent's Lifetime", Institut Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
13. J.A Pouwelse, P. Garbacki, D.H.J. Epema, H.J. Sips, "The BitTorrent P2P file-sharing system: Measurements and Analysis", Department of Computer Science, Delft University of Technology the Netherlands
14. I. Papafili, S. Soursos, and G. D. Stamoulis, "Improvement of BitTorrent Performance and Inter-domain Traffic by Inserting ISP-Owned Peers", ICQT09, May 2009.
15. H. Xie, A. Krishnamurthy, Y. R. Yang and A. Silberschatz,"P4P: Proactive Provider Participation for P2P", Tech. Rep. YALEU/DCS/TR-1377, Yale University (March 2007).
16. X. Dimitropoulos et al, "AS Relationships: Inference and Validation", In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (CCR), vol.37, no. 1, pp. 29-40, January 2007.
17. "Opentransit 2008 Peering Policy", http://vision.opentransit. net/docs/
18. Packeteer. Packeteer packetshaper.
19. B. Preneel, P.C. van Oorschot. MDx-MAC and building fast MACs from hash functions. Crypto'95, Springer LNCS vol.963, 1995.
20. K. Claffy and S. McCreary, "Internet measurement and data analysis: passive and active measurement", Univ. of California, CAIDA 1999.
21. The PingER Project, http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/pinger/.
22. CAIDA The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis, http://as-rank, caida. org/.