Improving traffic locality in BitTorrent via biased neighbor selection

Proceedings - International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Bindal, Ruchir ^a   Cao, Pei ^a   Chan, William ^a   Medved, Jan ^b   Suwala, George ^b   Bates, Tony ^b   Zhang, Amy ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b CISCO SYSTEMS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CACHING; GATEWAY PEERS; PEER TO PEER (P2P) APPLICATIONS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONGESTION CONTROL (COMMUNICATION); DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; GATEWAYS (COMPUTER NETWORKS); SERVERS;

TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

EID: 33947664001     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICDCS.2006.48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Bharambe, C. Herley, and V. N. Padmanabhan. Understanding and deconstructing bittorrent performance. In Proceedings of SIGMETRlCS, 2005.
2. CacheLogic. Cachelogic - advanced solutions for peer-to-peer networks, http://www.cachelogic.com.
3. M. Castro, P. Druschel, A. Kermarrec, A. Nandi, A. Rowstron, and A. Singh. Splitstream: High-bandwidth content distribution in a cooperative environment. In Proceedings of IPTPS'03, 2003.
4. Y.-H. Chu, S. G. Rao, and H. Zhang. A case for end system multicast. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, pages 1-12, 2000.
5. B. Cohen. Incentives build robustness in bittorrent, 2003.
6. B. Cohen. Bittorrent documentation: Protocol, 2005. http://www. bittorrent.com/protocol.html.
7. EContentMag.com. Chasing the user: The revenue streams of 2006, 2005. http://www.econtentmag.com/Articles/ArticleReader.aspx?ArticleID= 14532&ContextSubtypeID=8.
8. P. G. Epema. The bittorrent p2p file-sharing system: Measurements and analysis.
9. P. Francis. Your own internet distribution (yoid), 2002.
10. P. Ganesan and M. Seshadri. On cooperative content distribution and the price of barter. In Proceedings of ICDCS, 2005.
11. C. Gkantsidis and P.R. Rodriguez. Network coding for large scale content distribution. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2005.
12. L. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, E. Tan, X. Ding, and X. Zhang. Measuremsnts, analysis and modeling of bittorrent-like systems. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference, 2005.
13. C. S. Incorporated. Network based application recognition (nbar).
14. M. Izal, G. Urvoy-Keller, E. Biersack, P. Felber, A. Hamra, and L. Garces-Erice. Dissecting bittorrent: Five months in a torrent's lifetime, 2004.
15. T. Karagiannis, P. Rodriguez, and K. Papagiannaki. Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2005, 2005.
16. L. Massoulié and M. Vojnović. Coupon replication systems. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 33(1):2-13, 2005.
17. J. Mundinger and R. Weber. Efficient file dissemination using peer-to-peer technology.
18. W. B. Norton. The evolution of the u.s. internet peering system, 2003.
19. P-Cube. P-cube: Ip service control. http://www.p-cube.net/indexold.shtml.
20. Packeteer. Packetshaper. http://www.packeteer.com/prod-sol/products/ packetshaper.cfm.
21. V. Padmanabhan, H. Wang, P. Chou, and K. Sripanidkulchai. Distributing streaming media content using cooperative networking, 2002.
22. D. Qiu and R. Srikant. Modeling and performance analysis of bittorrent-like peer-to-peer networks, 2004.
23. Sandvine. Sandvine: Intelligent broadband network management. www.sandvine.com.
24. R. Sherwood, R. Braud, and B. Bhattacharjee. Slurpie: A cooperative bulk data transfer protocol. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2004.
25. X. Yang and G. de Veciana. Service capacity of peer to peer networks, 2004.