Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound parameters in the diagnosis of osteoporosis

Central European Journal of Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 478-485

  Pais, Raluca ^a   Campean, Remus ^a   Simon, Siao Pin ^a   Bolosiu, Calin R ^a   Muntean, Laura ^a   Bolosiu, Horatiu D ^a  

^a IULIU HATIEGANU UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Broadband ultrasound attenuation; DXA; Osteoporosis; Quantitative ultrasound; Speed of sound; T Score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77955965870     PISSN: 18951058     EISSN: 16443640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s11536-009-0076-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kanis J.A., McCloskey E.V., Johansson H., Oden A., Melton J.L., Khaltaev N., A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis, Bone, 2008, 42, 467-475
2. Laugier P., Quantitative ultrasound of bone: looking ahead, Joint Bone Spine, 2006, 73, 125-128
3. Kanis J.A., Burlet N., Cooper C., Delmas P.D., Reginster J.Y., Borgstrom F., Rizzoli R., European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, Osteoporos Int., 2008, 19, 399-428
4. Sahara Clinical User's Guide, 1998, Hologic Inc, USA
5. Holi M.S., Radhakrishnan S., Swaranamani S., Ayavelan N.A., Quantitative ultrasound technique for the assessment of osteoporosis and prediction of fracture risk J. Pure Appl. Ultrason., 2005, 27, 55-60
6. Cook R.B., Collins D., Tucker J., Zioupos P., Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA, Osteoporos Int., 2005, 16, 1565-1575
7. Khaw K.T., Reeve J., Luben R., Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPICNorfolk prospective population study, Lancet, 2004, 363, 197-202
8. Hans D., Dargent-Molina P., Schott A.M., Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospectivestudy, Lancet 1996, 348, 511-514
9. Krieg M.A., Cornuz J., Ruffieux C., Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or = 70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study, J Bone Miner Res., 2006, 21, 1457-1463
10. Frost M.L., Blake G.M., Fogelman I., Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int., 2000, 11, 321-330
11. Boonen S., Nijs J., Borghs H., Peeters H., Vanderschueren D., Luyten F.P., Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study, Osteoporos Int., 2005, 16, 93-100
12. Kanis J.A., Glüer C.C., An update on the diagnosis and assessement of osteoporosis with densitometry, Osteoporosis Int., 2000, 11, 192-202
13. Ikeda I., Iki M., Morita A., Aihara H., Kagawa Y., Matsuzaki T., et al., Age-specific values and cutoff levels for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in quantitative ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus with SAHARA in healthy Japanese women: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) study, Calcif Tissue Int., 2002, 71, 1-9
14. Agren M., Karellas A., Leahey D., Marks S., Baran D., Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women, Calcif Tissue Int., 1991, 48, 240-244
15. Dubois E.F., Van den Bergh J.P., Smals A.G., Van de Meerendonk C.W., Zwinderman A.H., Schweitzer D.H., Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women, Neth J Med., 2001, 58, 62-70
16. Falgarone G., Porcher R., Duché A., Kolta S., Dougados M., Roux C., Discrimination of osteoporotic patients with quantitative ultrasound using imaging or non-imaging device, Joint Bone Spine, 2004, 71, 419-423
17. Trimpou P., Bosaeus I., Bengtsson B.A., Landin- Wilhelmsen K., High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up, Eur J Radiol 2009, (in press), doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.024
18. Damilakis J., Perisinakis K., Gourtsoyiannis N., Ultrasonometry of the Calcaneus: Optimum T-Score Thresholds for the Identification of Osteoporotic Subjects, Calcif Tissue Int., 2001, 68, 219-224
19. Nayak S., Olkin I., Liu H., Grabe M., Gould M.K., Allen E., et al., Meta-Analysis: Accuracy of Quantitative Ultrasound for Identifying Patients with Osteoporosis, Ann Intern Med., 2006, 144, 832-841
20. Kung A.W., Ho A.Y., Ross P.D., Reginster J.Y., Development of a clinical assessment tool in identifying Asian men with low bone mineral density and comparison of its usefulness to quantitative bone ultrasound, Osteoporos Int., 2005, 16, 849-855
21. Hodson J., Marsh J., Quantitative ultrasound and risk factor enquiry as predictors of postmenopausal osteoporosis: comparative study in primary care, BMJ, 2003, 326, 1250-1251
22. Cetin A., Ertürk H., Celiker R., Sivri A., Hascelik Z., The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual x-ray absorptiometry, Rheumatol Int., 2001, 20, 55-59
23. Hans D., Hartl F., Krieg M. A., "Device-specific weighted Tscore for two quantitative ultrasounds: Operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland," Osteoporos. Int., 2003, 14, 251-258
24. Welch A., Camus J., Dalzell N., Oakes S., Reeve J., Khaw K.T., Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the heel bone and its correlates in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort: a crosssectional population-based study, Osteoporos Int., 2004, 15, 217-2225