Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1565-1575

  Cook, R B ^a   Collins, D ^b   Tucker, J ^b   Zioupos, P ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GREAT WESTERN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DXA; Osteoporosis; Screening; Sensitivity; Specificity; Ultrasound scanners

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOPENIA; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING; SELF EVALUATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BONE DENSITY; BONE DISEASES, METABOLIC; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HIP; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 29044441549     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1864-x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Geusens P, Hochberg MC, van der Voort DJM, et al (2002) Performance of risk indicies for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal women. Mayo Clin Proc 77:629-637
2. Koh LKH, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP, et al (2001) A simple tool to identify asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:699-705
3. Fujiwara S, Masunari N, Suzuki G, et al (2001) Performance of osteoporosis risk indices in a Japanese population. 62:586-594
4. Adler RA, Tran MT, Petkov VI (2003) Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Screening Tool for osteoporosis in American men. Mayo Clin Proc 78:723-727
5. Kung AWC, Ho AYY, Sedrine WB, et al (2003) Comparison of a simple clinical risk index and quantitative bone ultrasound for identifying women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:716-721
6. Richy F, Gourlay M, Ross PD, et al (2004) Validation and comparative evaluation of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) in a Caucasian population from Belgium. Q J Med 97:39-46
7. Park HM, Sedrine WB, Reginster JY, et al (2003) Korean experience with the OSTA Risk Index for Osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 6:247-250
8. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, et al (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. Can Med Assoc J 162:1289-1294
9. Von Mühlen D, Lunde AV, Barrett-Connor E, et al (1999) Evaluation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) in older Caucasian women: The Rancho Bernardo Study. Osteoporos Int 10:79-84
10. Sedrine WB, Devogelaer JP, Kaufman JM, et al (2001) Evaluation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) in a sample of White women from Belgium. Bone 29:374-380
11. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM (1999) Validation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 10:85-90
12. Falasca GF, Dunston C, Banglawala YA (2003) Further validation of a questionnaire to identify women likely to have low bone density. J Clin Densitom 6:231-236
13. Ungar WJ, Josse R, Lee S, et al (2000) The Canadian Score Questionnaire. J Clin Densitom 3:269-280
14. Sedrine WB, Chevallier T, Zegels B, et al (2002) Development and assessment of the Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS) to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. Gynecol Endocrinol 16:245-250
15. Reginster JY, Sedrine WB, Viethel P, et al (2004) Validation of OSIRIS, a prescreening tool for the identification of women with an increased risk of osteoporosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 18:3-8
16. Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, et al (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519-528
17. Randell AG, Bhalerao N, Nguyen TV, et al (1998) Quality of life in osteoporosis: reliability, consistency, and validity of the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire. J Rheumatol 25:1171-1179
18. Gerber V, Krieg MA, Cornuz J, et al (2003) Nutritional status using the Mini Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and its relationship with bone quality in a population of institutionalized elderly women. J Nutr Health Aging 7:140-145
19. Goemaere S, Zegels B, Toye K, et al (1999) Limited clinical utility of a self-evaluating risk assessment scale for postmenopausal osteoporosis: lack of predictive value of lifestyle-related factors. Calcif Tissue Int 65:354-358
20. Michaëlsson K, Bergström R, Mallmin H, et al (1996) Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: selection by body composition. Osteoporos Int 6:120-126
21. Greenhalgh T (1997) How to read a paper: papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ 315:540-543
22. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, et al (2003) The diagnostic odd ratios: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129-1135
23. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Uses and abuses of screening tests. Lancet 359:881-884
24. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285-1293
25. Leib ES, Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, et al (2004) Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry. J Clin Densitom 7:1-6
26. Greenspan SL, Bouxsein ML, Melton ME, et al (1997) Precision and discriminatory ability of calcaneal bone assessment technologies. J Bone Miner Res 12:1303-1313
27. Brooke-Wavell K, Jones PR, Pye DW (1995) Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location. Calcif Tissue Int 57:20-24
28. Johansen A, Evans W, Stone M (1999) Bone assessment in elderly women: what does a low bone ultrasound result tell us about bone mineral density? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 28:239-246
29. Njeh CF, Hans D, Li J, et al (2000) Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination. Osteoporos Int 11:1051-1062
30. Herd RJM, Blake GM, Miller CG, et al (1994) The ultrasonic assessment of osteopenia as defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol 67:631-635
31. Graafmans WC, Lingen AV, Ooms ME, et al (1996) Ultrasound measurements in the calcaneus: precision and its relation with bone mineral density of the heel and the lumber spine. Bone 19:97-100
32. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, et al (2001) Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause- related changes, fracture discrimination, and t -score equivalence with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 12:456-464
33. Damilakis JE, Papadokostakis G, Vrahoriti H, et al (2003) Ultrasound velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device. Invest Radiol 38:207-211
34. Nicholson PHF, Strelitzki R, Cleveland RO, et al (2000) Scattering of ultrasound in cancellous bone: predictions from a theoretical model. J Biomech 33:503-506
35. Stewart A, Reid DM (2000) Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors - which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis? Br J Radiol 73:165-171
36. Adler RA, Funkhouser HL, Holt CM (2001) Utility of heel ultrasound bone density in men. J Clin Densitom 4:225-230
37. Ekman A, Michaëlsson K, Petrén-Mallmin M, et al (2002) Dual X-ray absorptiometry of hip, heel ultrasound, and densitometry of fingers can discriminate male patients with hip fractures from control subjects. J Clin Densitom 5:79-85
38. Sørensen HA, Jørgensen NR, Jensen J-EB, et al (2001) Comparison of quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in estrogen-treated early postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 4:97-104
39. Falgarone G, Porcher R, Duché A, et al (2004) Discrimination of osteoporotic patients with quantitative ultrasound using imaging or non-imaging device. Joint Bone Spine (corrected proof)
40. Damilakis JE, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, et al (2003) Can Radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment? Osteoporos Int 14:688-693
41. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, et al (2004) Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to the multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int 15:367-374
42. Gambacciani M, de Aloysio D, Elia D, et al (2003) Quantitative ultrasound (qus) of bone in the management of postmenopausal women. Maturitas 47:139-149
43. Hans D, Hartl F, Krieg MA (2003) Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational proportions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 14:251-258