Computer-based training: Capitalizing on lessons learned

International Journal of Training and Development

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 239-249

  Bedwell, Wendy L ^a   Salas, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955934763     PISSN: 13603736     EISSN: 14682419     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00355.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adams A M. Issues and innovations in nursing education: pedagogical underpinnings of computer-based learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004, 46(1):5-12.
2. Anger W, Stupfel J, Ammerman T, Tamulinas A, Bodner T, Rohlman D. The suitability of computer-based training for workers with limited formal education: a case study from the US agricultural sector. International Journal of Training & Development 2006, 10(4):269-84.
3. Barton P E. Facing the Hard Facts in Education Reform 2001, http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICFACINGFACTS.pdf, Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service, Available at (accessed 17 June 2010
4. Bates A W. Technology, Open Learning, and Distance Education 1997, Routledge studies in distance education, London, Routledge
5. Bates A W. Technology, E-Learning and Distance Education 2005, Routledge Falmer studies in distance education, London, Routledge
6. Beasley R, Lister D. User orientation in hypertext glossary. Journal of Computer Based Instruction 1992, 19(4):115-18.
7. Berge Z L. The Context of Distance Training: Predicting Change. Sustaining Distance Training 2001, 3-12. Berge Z. ed., San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
8. Bersin J. The Blended Learning Book - Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned 2004, San Francisco, CA, Pfeiffer
9. Burke M, Sarpy S, Smith-Crowe K, Chan-Serafin S, Salvador R, Islam G. Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods. American Journal of Public Health 2006, 96(2):315-24.
10. Bürki-Cohen J, Sparko A L, Go T H. Training value of a fixed-based flight simulator with a dynamic seat: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Conference. 2007, Hilton Head, SC
11. Cassell J. Embodied conversational agents: representation and intelligence in user interfaces: AI Magazine. 2001, Winter:67-83.
12. Cerpa N, Chandler P, Sweller J. Some conditions under which integrated computer-based training software can facilitate learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1996, 15(4):345-67.
13. Clark R. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research 1983, 53(4):445-9.
14. Clark R. Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development 1994, 42:21-9.
15. Cross J, Hamilton I. The DNA of eLearning. Beyond eLearning 2002, Cross J, Hamilton I. eds, New York, Internet Time Group
16. Daft R L, Lengel R H. Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural determinants. Management Science 1986, 32(5):554-71.
17. DeLuca D, Gasson S, Kock N. Adaptations that virtual teams make so that complex tasks can be performed using simple e-collaboration technologies. International Journal of E-Collaboration 2006, 2(3):64-90.
18. DeRouin R E, Fritzsche B A, Salas E. Optimizing e-learning: research-based guidelines for learner-controlled training. Human Resource Management Journal 2004, 43(2/3):147-62.
19. Don A, Brennan S, Laurel B, Shneiderman B. Anthropomorphism: from Eliza to Terminator 2. 1992, (pp. 67-70). New York: Association of Computing Machinery
20. Dumont R A. Teaching and learning in cyberspace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 1996, 39:192-204.
21. El-Tigi M, Branch R M. Designing for interaction, learner control, and feedback during web-based learning. Educational Technology 1997, 37:23-9.
22. Erwin S I. Videogame market: a huge source of untapped technology: National Defense Magazine. 2004, http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2004/December/Pages/VideogameMarket3337.aspx, Available at (accessed 17 June 2010
23. Gagne R M. The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction 1985, 4th, edn, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston
24. Gibbons A S, Fairweather P G. Computer-Based Instruction. Training and Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military 2000, 410-42. Tobias S, Fletcher J D. eds, New York, Macmillan Gale Group.
25. Goldstein I L, Ford J K. Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation 2002, 4th, edn, Belmont, CA, Wadsworth
26. Hannafin M J, Hooper S. An integrated framework for CBI screen design and layout. Computers in Human Behavior 1989, 5(3):155-65.
27. Hazen M. Instructional software design principles. Educational Technology 1985, 15(11):18-23.
28. Hiltz S R, Wellman B. Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM 1997, 40:44-9.
29. Hooper S, Hannafin M J. Learning the ROPES of instructional design: guidelines for emerging interactive technologies. Educational Technology 1988, 28(7):14-18.
30. Kearsley G. Authoring considerations for hypertext. Educational Technology 1988, 28:21-4.
31. Kensworthy N. When Johnny can't read: multimedia design strategies to accommodate poor readers. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems 1993, Winter:27-30.
32. Kirkpatrick D L. Evaluation. Training and Development Handbook 1976, 294-312. Craig R L. ed., 2nd, edn, New York, McGraw-Hill.
33. Kock N. Evolution and media naturalness: A look at e-communication through a Darwinian theoretical lens. 2002, Paper presented at the 23rd international conference on information systems, Atlanta, GA
34. Kock N. The psychobiological model: towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science 2004, 15(3):327-48.
35. Kock N. Compensatory adaptation to media obstacles: an experimental study of process redesign dyads. Information Resources Management Journal 2005, 18(2):41-67.
36. Koonce J M, Bramble W J. Personal computer-based flight training devices. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1998, 8:277-92.
37. Kraiger K, Jerden E. A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Learner Control: Old Findings and New Directions. Toward a Science of Distributed Learning 2007, 65-90. Fiore S M, Salas E. eds, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
38. Mayer R E. Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 1997, 32:1-19.
39. Mayer R. The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13(2):125-39.
40. Mayer R. Introduction to Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning 2005, 1-16. Mayer R. ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
41. McCauley M E. Do Army Helicopter Training Simulators Need Motion Bases? 2006, ARI Technical Report 1176, Arlington, VA, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
42. Moore M G. Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 1989, 3(2):1-6.
43. Mukherjee P, Edmonds G. Screen design: a review of research. 1993, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED370561
44. Noe R A, Colquitt J A. Planning for Training Impact: Principles of Training Effectiveness. Creating, Implementing, and Managing Effective Training and Development 2002, 53-79. Kraiger K, ed., San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass.
45. Ortiz G A, Kopp D, Willenbucher T. Instrument Training Using a Computer-Based Simulation Device at Lufthansa Airlines. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology 1995, 1047-50. Jensen R S, Rakovan L A, eds, Columbus, OH, The Ohio State University.
46. Overbaugh R. Research-based guidelines for computer-based instruction development. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 1994, 27(1):29-48.
47. Park I, Hannafin M. Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development 1993, 41(3):63-85.
48. Rhodes B J. Just-in-time information retrieval. 2000, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.43.4883&rep=rep1&type=pdf, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Architecture and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. (Available at (accessed 17 June 2010
49. Rosenberg M J. E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age 2001, New York, McGraw-Hill
50. Rosenberg M J. Beyond E-learning: Approaches and Technologies to Enhance Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Performance 2006, San Francisco, CA, Pfeiffer
51. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers J A. The science of training: a decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 52:471-99.
52. Salas E, Burgess K A, Cannon-Bowers J A. Training Effectiveness Techniques. Research Techniques in Human Engineering 1995, 439-71. Weiner J, ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, pp.
53. Salas E, Bowers C A, Rhodenizer L. It is not how much you have but how you use it: toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1998, 8:197-208.
54. Schmidt R A, Bjork R A. New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 1992, 3:207-17.
55. Schwier R A, Misanchuk E R. The effect of interaction and perceived need for training on learning from computer based instruction. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 1988, 17(3):147-58.
56. Short J, Williams E, Christie B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications 1976, London, Wiley
57. Sitzmann T, Kraiger K, Stewart D, Wisher R. The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 2006, 59:623-64.
58. Smith T C. Fifty-one competencies of online instruction. The Journal of Educators Online 2005, 2(2):1-18.
59. Squire K. Open-ended Video Games: A Model for Developing Learning for the Interactive Age. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning 2008, 167-98. Salen K. ed., Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
60. Strother J. An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 2002, 3(1):1-17.
61. Suh K S. Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: an examination of media-richness theory. Information and Management 1999, 35:295-312.
62. Sullivan P. Gender differences and the on-line classroom. Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 2001, 25:805-18.
63. Taylor H L, Lintern G, Koonce J M. Quasi-transfer as a predictor of transfer from simulator to airplane. Journal of General Psychology 1993, 120:257-76.
64. Tripp S D, Roby W. Orientation and orientation in a hypertext lexicon. Journal of Computer Based Instruction 1990, 17(4):120-4.
65. Welsh E T, Wanberg C R, Brown K G, Simmering M J. E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development 2003, 7(4):245-58.
66. Wilson K A, Bedwell W L, Lazzara E H, Salas E, Burke C S, Estock J. Relationship between game attributes and learning outcomes: review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming 2009, 40:217-66.