Portfolio choice, attention allocation, and price comovement

Journal of Economic Theory

Volumn 145, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1837-1864

  Mondria, Jordi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Asset pricing; Portfolio choice; Rational inattention

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955918175     PISSN: 00220531     EISSN: 10957235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Admati A. A noisy rational expectations equilibrium for multi-asset securities markets. Econometrica 1985, 53:629-657.
2. Barberis N., Shleifer A., Wurgler J. Comovement. J. Finan. Econ. 2005, 75:283-318.
3. G. Calvo, Contagion in emerging markets: when Wall Street is a carrier, Working Paper, 1999.
4. Corwin S., Coughenour J. Limited attention and the allocation of effort in securities trading. J. Finance 2008, 63:3031-3067.
5. Greenwood R. Excess comovement of stock returns: Evidence from cross-sectional variation in Nikkei 225 weights. Rev. Finan. Stud. 2008, 21:1153-1186.
6. A. Hameed, R. Morck, J. Shen, B. Yeung, Information markets, analysts, and comovement in stock returns, NYU Working Paper, 2008.
7. Hellwig C., Veldkamp L. Knowing what others know: Coordination motives in information acquisition. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2009, 76:223-251.
8. Kallberg J., Pasquariello P. Time-series and cross-sectional excess comovement in stock indexes. J. Empirical Finance 2008, 15:481-502.
9. Khinchin A. Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory 1957, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
10. King M., Wadhwani S. Transmission of volatility between stock markets. Rev. Finan. Stud. 1990, 3:5-33.
11. Kreps D., Porteus E. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 1978, 46:185-200.
12. Kreps D., Porteus E. Temporal von Neumann-Morgenstern and induced preferences. J. Econ. Theory 1979, 20:81-109.
13. Kodres L., Pritsker M. A rational expectations model of financial contagion. J. Finance 2002, 57:769-799.
14. Kyle A., Xiong W. Contagion as a wealth effect. J. Finance 2001, 56:1401-1440.
15. Luo Y. Consumption dynamics under information processing constraints. Rev. Econ. Dynam. 2008, 11:366-385.
16. Mackowiak B., Wiederholt M. Optimal sticky prices under rational inattention. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99:769-803.
17. B. Mackowiak, M. Wiederholt, Business cycle dynamics under rational inattention, Working Paper, 2009.
18. P. Pasquariello, C. Vega, Strategic trading in the U.S. stock market, Working Paper, 2009.
19. Peng L. Learning with information capacity constraints. J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 2005, 40:307-329.
20. Peng L., Xiong W. Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. J. Finan. Econ. 2006, 80:563-602.
21. Pindyck R., Rotemberg J. The comovement of stock prices. Quart. J. Econ. 1993, 108:1073-1104.
22. Sims C. Implications of rational inattention. J. Monet. Econ. 2003, 50:665-690.
23. Sims C. Rational inattention: A research agenda. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2006, 96:158-163.
24. Spence M., Zeckhauser R. The effect of the timing of consumption decisions and the resolution of lotteries on the choice of lotteries. Econometrica 1972, 40:401-403.
25. Van Nieuwerburgh S., Veldkamp L. Information acquisition and portfolio under-diversification. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2010, 77(2):779-805.
26. Van Nieuwerburgh S., Veldkamp L. Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. J. Finance 2009, 64:1187-1215.
27. Veldkamp L. Information markets and the comovement of asset prices. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2006, 73:823-845.
28. Verrecchia R. Information acquisition in a noisy rational expectations economy. Amer. Econ. Rev. 1982, 50:1415-1430.
29. Yuan K. Asymmetric price movements and borrowing constraints: A REE model of crisis, contagion, and confusion. J. Finance 2005, 60:379-411.