Privacy issues in scientific workflow provenance

Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Davidson, Susan B ^a   Khanna, Sanjeev ^a   Roy, Sudeepa ^a   Boulakia, Sarah Cohen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY;

CONFIDENTIAL DATA; FORMAL MODEL; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIVACY ISSUE; PRIVATE INFORMATION; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOW PROVENANCES; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 77955910343     PISSN: 07308078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1833398.1833401     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Privacy-preserving data mining: Models and algorithms. www.charuaggarwal.net/toc.pdf, 33(1):50-57, 2004.
2. N. R. Adam and J. C. Worthmann. Security-control methods for statistical databases: a comparative study. ACM Comput. Surv., 21(4):515-556, 1989.
3. G. Aggarwal, T. Feder, K. Kenthapadi, S. Khuller, R. Panigrahy, D. Thomas, and A. Zhu. Achieving anonymity via clustering. In PODS, pages 153-162, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
4. L. Backstrom, C. Dwork, and J. M. Kleinberg. Wherefore art thou r3579x?: anonymized social networks, hidden patterns, and structural steganography. In WWW, pages 181-190, 2007.
5. O. Biton, S. Cohen-Boulakia, S. Davidson, and C. Hara. Querying and managing provenance through user views in scientific workflows. In ICDE, 2008.
6. O. Biton, S. B. Davidson, S. Khanna, and S. Roy. Optimizing user views for workflows. In ICDT, pages 310-323, 2009.
7. S. Bowers and B. Ludäscher. Actor-oriented design of scientific workflows. In ER, 2005.
8. U. Braun, A. Shinnar, and M. Seltzer. Securing provenance. In USENIX HotSec.
9. A. Campan and T. M. Truta. A clustering approach for data and structural anonymity in social networks. In PinKDD, 2008.
10. A. Chebotko, S. Chang, S. Lu, F. Fotouhi, and P. Yang. Scientific workflow provenance querying with security views. WAIM, pages 349-356, July 2008.
11. S. B. Davidson, S. Khanna, D. Panigrahi, and S. Roy. Preserving module privacy in workflow provenance. Technical Report MS-CIS-10-22, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, May 2010.
12. I. Dinur and K. Nissim. Revealing information while preserving privacy. In PODS, pages 202-210, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
13. C. Dwork. Differential privacy: A survey of results. In TAMC, pages 1-19, 2008.
14. C. Dwork. The differential privacy frontier (extended abstract). In TCC, pages 496-502, 2009.
15. J. Freire, C. T. Silva, S. P. Callahan, E. Santos, C. E. Scheidegger, and H. T. Vo. Managing rapidly-evolving scientific workflows. In IPAW, 2006.
16. A. Gil, W. K. Cheung, V. Ratnakar, and K. kin Chan. Privacy enforcement in data analysis workflows. In PEAS, 2007.
17. Y. Gil and C. Fritz. Reasoning about the appropriate use of private data through computational workflows. In Intelligent Information Privacy Management, Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium, pages 69-74, March 2010.
18. R. Hasan, R. Sion, and M. Winslett. Introducing secure provenance: problems and challenges. In StorageSS, pages 13-18, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
19. A. Korolova, R. Motwani, S. U. Nabar, and Y. Xu. Link privacy in social networks. In CIKM, pages 289-298, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
20. J. Lyle and A. Martin. Trusted computing and provenance: Better together. In TaPP '10: 2nd Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance, 2010.
21. A. Machanavajjhala, D. Kifer, J. Gehrke, and M. Venkitasubramaniam. L-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 1(1):3, 2007.
22. R. Motwani, S. U. Nabar, and D. Thomas. Auditing sql queries. In ICDE, pages 287-296, 2008.
23. S. U. Nabar, B. Marthi, K. Kenthapadi, N. Mishra, and R. Motwani. Towards robustness in query auditing. In VLDB, pages 151-162. VLDB Endowment, 2006.
24. T. Oinn et al. Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics, 20(1), 2003.
25. V. Rastogi, M. Hay, G. Miklau, and D. Suciu. Relationship privacy: output perturbation for queries with joins. In PODS, pages 107-116, 2009.
26. P. Sun, Z. Liu, S. B. Davidson, and Y. Chen. Detecting and resolving unsound workflow views for correct provenance analysis. In SIGMOD '09: Proceedings of the 35th SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 549-562, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
27. L. Sweeney. k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., 10(5):557-570, 2002.
28. V. S. Verykios, E. Bertino, I. N. Fovino, L. P. Provenza, Y. Saygin, and Y. Theodoridis. State-of-the-art in privacy preserving data mining. SIGMOD Rec., 33(1):50-57, 2004.