Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: An in vitro study

Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 73-77

  Jawa, D ^b   Singh, S ^b   Somani, R ^b   Jaidka, S ^a   Sirkar, K ^a   Jaidka, R ^a  

^a DJ College of Dental Sciences and Research   (India)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Caries; conventional rotary instrument; Papacarie

Indexed keywords

PAPACARIE; PAPAIN;

ARTICLE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; TIME; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; PROCEDURES;

DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; HUMANS; MOLAR; PAPAIN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77955910325     PISSN: 09704388     EISSN: 19983905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.66739     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Habib CM, Kronman J, Goldman M. A chemical evaluation of collagen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-chloroglycine). Pharmacol Ther Dent 1975;2:209-215
2. Schutzbank SG, Galaini J, Kronman JH, Goldman M, Clark RE. A comparative in vitro study of the effect of GK-101 and GK-101E in caries removal. J Dent Res 1978;57:861-864
3. Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemomechanical caries removal: a review of techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J 2000;188:427-430
4. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries: A multicentre study. Caries Res 1999;33:171-177
5. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão AC. Papain gel: a new chemomechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;30:115-119
6. Guzman AV, Stein De Guzman MG. The enzymatic debridement of suppurations, necrotic lesions and burns with papain. J Int Coll Surg 1953;20:695-702.
7. Udod VM, Storozhuk VT. Use of papain in trating suppurative postoperative soft tissue complications and diases. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 1981;19:99-101.
8. Flindt M. Health and safety aspects of working with enzymes. Process Biochem 1979;13:3-7.
9. Dawkins G, Hewitt H, Wint Y, Obiefuna PC, Wint B. Antimicrobial effects of Carica papaya fruit on common wound organisms. West Indian Med J 2003;52:290-292
10. Bussadori SK, Silva LR, Guedes Cc. Utilization of Papacarie for chemical and mechanical removal of decayed tooth in Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART): Minimum invention technique for treatment of deep dental decay. 2005. p. 391-400.
11. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries Res 1999;33:171-177
12. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods. Caries Res 2001;35:384-389
13. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35:205-210
14. Carrillo CM, Tanaka MH, Cesar M F, Camargo MA, Juliano Y, Novo NF. Use of papain gel in disabled patients. J Dent Child (Chic) 2008;75:3-5.