Sustaining behavioral diversity in NEAT

Proceedings of the 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO '10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 611-618

  Moriguchi, Hirotaka ^a   Honiden, Shinichi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Behavioral diversity; NEAT; Neuroevolution; Niching; Premature convergence

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL DIVERSITY; NEAT; NEUROEVO-LUTION; NICHING; PREMATURE CONVERGENCE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 77955900415     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1830483.1830595     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. D. Floreano, P. Dürr, andC. Mattiussi. Neuroevolution: from architectures to learning. Evolutionary Intelligence, 1(1), 2008.
2. D. Goldberg andJ. Richardson. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1987.
3. F. Gomez. Sustaining diversity using behavioral information distance. GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 2009.
4. K. D. Jong. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. University of Michigan, ogic of Computers Group, 1975.
5. S. Kalyanakrishnan andP. Stone. An empirical analysis of value function-based and policy search reinforcement learning. AAMAS '09: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2, 2009.
6. J. Lehman andK. O. Stanley. Exploiting open-endedness to solve problems through the search for novelty. In ALIFE XI: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Life, 2008.
7. M. Li, X. Chen, X. Li, B. Ma, andP. Vitanyi. The similarity metric. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 2004.
8. D. Moriarty, A. Schultz, andJ. Grefenstette. Evolutionary algorithms for reinforcement learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11, 1999.
9. J.-B. Mouret andS. Doncieux. Using behavioral exploration objectives to solve deceptive problems in neuro-evolution. GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 2009.
10. S. Risi, S. Vanderbleek, C. Hughes, andK. O. Stanley. How novelty search escapes the deceptive trap of learning to learn. GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 2009.
11. B. Sareni andL. Krahenbuhl. Fitness sharing and niching methods revisited. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2(3), 1998.
12. K. O. Stanley andR. Miikkulainen. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary Computation, 10(2), 2002.
13. K. O. Stanley, D. B. D'Ambrosio, andJ. Gauci. A hypercube-based encoding for evolving large-scale neural networks. Artificial Life, 15(2), 2009.
14. L. Trujillo, G. Olague, E. Lutton, and F. de Vega. Discovering several robot behaviors through speciation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4974, 2008.
15. S. Whiteson, M. Taylor, andP. Stone. Critical factors in the empirical performance of temporal difference and evolutionary methods for reinforcement learning. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2009.
16. X. Yao. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9), 1999.