Controlled interaction: Strategies for using virtual reality to study perception

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 414-420

  Durgin, Frank H ^a   Li, Zhi ^a  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTION DISORDER; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77955891950     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.414     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akagi, M., & Durgin, F. (2007). Accurate perception of visual space from live-video in a head-mounted display [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7, 283a. doi:10.1167/7.9.283
2. Bridgeman, B., & Hoover, M. (2008). Processing spatial layout by perception and sensorimotor interaction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 851-859.
3. Creem-Regehr, S. H., Gooch, A. A., Sahm, C. S., & Thompson, W. B. (2004). Perceiving virtual geographical slant: Action influences perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 811-821. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.811
4. Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaugh-nessy, K., & Waymouth, S. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 964-969. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.964
5. Durgin, F. H., & Gigone, K. (2007). Enhanced optic flow speed discrimination while walking: Contextual tuning of visual coding. Perception, 36, 1465-1475.
6. Durgin, F. H., Gigone, K., & Scott, R. (2005). The perception of visual speed while moving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 339-353.
7. Durgin, F. H., Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2010). Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception. Acta Psychologica, 134, 182-197. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.01.009
8. Durgin, F. H., Reed, C., & Tigue, C. (2007). Step frequency and perceived self-motion. ACM Transactions in Applied Perception, 4, 1-27.
9. Grodner, D., Pietsch, C., & Durgin, F. H. (2009). The use of categorical features in adult spatial reorientation. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 280-285). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.
10. Harris, L. R., Morgan, M. J., & Still, A. W. (1981). Moving and the motion after-effect. Nature, 293, 139-141.
11. Interrante, V., Anderson, L., & Ries, B. (2006). Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (pp. 3-10). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Interrante, V., Ries, B., Lindquist, J., & Anderson, L. (2007). Elucidating the factors that can facilitate veridical spatial perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (pp. 11-18). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
13. Kuhl, S. A., Thompson, W. B., & Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2009). HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6, 19.
14. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H. (2009). Downhill slopes look shallower from the edge. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-15. doi:10.1167/9.11.6
15. Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 557-564.
16. Loomis, J. M., & Knapp, J. M. (2003). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger & M. W. Haas (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments (pp. 21-45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Messing, R., & Durgin, F. H. (2005). Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 234-250. doi:10.1145/1077399.1077403
18. Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willem-sen, P., Pick, H. L., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4, 1-15. doi:10.1145/1227134.1227138
19. Ooi, T.L.,Wu, B., & He, Z. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197-200.
20. Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.
21. Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428.
22. Russell, R., & Durgin, F. H. (2008). Demand characteristics, not effort: The role of backpacks in judging distance [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6), 755a.
23. Teghtsoonian, R., & Teghtsoonian, M. (1970). Scaling apparent distance in a natural outdoor setting. Psychonomic Science, 21, 215-216.
24. Thompson, W. B., Willemson, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (2004). Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distance in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 13, 560-571.
25. Wallach, H., & Flaherty, E. W. (1975). A compensation for field expansion caused by moving forward. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 445-449.
26. Warren, W. H., Kay, B. A., Zosh, W. D., Duchon, A. P., & Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuro-science, 4, 213-216.
27. Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biolog y, 11, R729-R732.