The rise of Firefox in the web browser industry: The role of open source in setting standards

Business History

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 834-856

  Oshri, Ilan ^a   de Vries, Henk J ^a   de Vries, Huibert ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Firefox; Internet Explorer; Open source software; Setting standards; Web browsers

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; SOFTWARE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 77955884955     PISSN: 00076791     EISSN: 17437938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2010.499431     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews, P. (1997, December 7). Two years ago Gates dropped a warhead that is still exploding. Seattle Times.
2. Arthur, W.B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 97, 642-665.
3. Bresnahan, T.F., & Yin, P.L. (2007). Standard setting in markets: the browser war. In S. Greensrein & V. Stango (Eds.), Standards and public policy (pp. 18-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ghemawat, P. (2005). Microsoft versus open source, working knowledge (Harvard Business School, interview). Retrieved from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ item/4834.html
5. Corts, K.S., & Freier, D. (2003). A brief history of the browser wars. Boston: Harvard Business Case Online. Retrieved from http://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/cases
6. Cusumano, M., Mylonadis, Y., & Rosenbloom, R. (1992). Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamic: The triumph of VHS over Beta. Business History Review, 66, 51-94.
7. Cusumano, M., & Yoffie, D. (1998). Competing on Internet time: Lessons from Netscape and its battle with Microsoft. New York: Touchstone.
8. Dedrick, J., & West, J. (2004, January 5-8). An exploratory study into open source platform adoption. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Hawaii.
9. Egyedi, T.M., & van Wendel de Joode, R. (2004). Standards & other coordination mechanisms in open source software. International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, 2(1), 1-17.
10. Ehrhardt, M. (2004). Network effects, standardization and competitive strategy: How companies influence the emergence of dominant designs. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2/3), 272-294.
11. Farrell, J., & Gallini, N. (1988). Second-sourcing as a commitment: Monopoly incentives to attract competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 673-694.
12. Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 70-83.
13. Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1988). Coordination through committees and markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(2), 235-252.
14. Grant, R.M. (2002). Contemporary strategy analysis (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
15. Jenkins, M., Liu, P., Matzkin, R.L., & McFadden, D.L. (2004). The browser war - econometric analysis of Markov Perfect equilibrium in markets with network effects (Unpublished working paper). University of California at Berkeley, San Francisco.
16. Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
17. Klein, B. (2001). The Microsoft case: What can a dominant firm to defend its market position? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 45-62.
18. Kogut, B., & Metiu, A. (2001). Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2, 248-264.
19. Krechmer, K. (2006). Open standards requirements. International Journal of IT standards and Standardization Research, 4(1), 43-61.
20. Krishnamurthy, S. (2005). About Closed-door Free/Libre/Open Source (FLOSS) projects: Lessons from the Mozilla Firefox developer recruitment. UPGRADE, 5(3). Retrieved from http://www.upgradecepis.org/issues/2005/3/up6-3Krishnamurthy.pdf
21. MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., & Baldwin, C.Y. (2004). Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code (Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, no. 05-016). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
22. Mockus, A., Fielding, R.T., & Herbsleb, H.D. (2002). Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11(3), 1-38.
23. Morrison, S. (2004, November 8). Firefox uses cunning to take on the Godzilla of Microsoft. Financial Times, p. 20.
24. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H.R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the networked economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
25. West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32, 1259-1285.
26. West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319-331.
27. Windrum, P. (2000). Back from the brink: Microsoft and the strategic use ofstandards in the Browser Wars. Maastricht: MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
28. Windrum, P. (2004). Leveraging technological externalities in complex technologies: Microsoft's exploitation of standards in the browser wars. Research Policy, 33, 385-394.
29. Yoffie, D.B., & Kwak, M. (2001). The browser wars, 1994-1998. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Case Online.