Network effects, standardisation and competitive strategy: How companies influence the emergence of dominant designs

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 27, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 272-294

  Ehrhardt, Marcus ^a  

^a Booz Allen Hamilton Inc   (Germany)

Author keywords

Compatibility; Competitive strategy; Dominant design; Network effects; Open systems; Standardisation

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CONSUMER ELECTRONICS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; OPEN SYSTEMS; PRODUCT DESIGN; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMPATIBILITY; COMPETITIVE STRATEGY; DOMINANT DESIGN; NETWORK EFFECTS;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 1542285400     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2004.003956     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arthur, B.W. (1989) 'Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events', Economic Journal, Vol. 99, pp.116-131.
2. Arthur, B.W. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor.
3. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1985) 'Standardization, compatibility, and innovation' RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 70-83.
4. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1985) 'Network externalities, competition and compatibility', American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 424-440.
5. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1994) 'Systems competition and network effects', Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.93-115.
6. Teece, D.J. (1992) 'Strategies for capturing the financial benefits from technological innovation', in N. Rosenberg, R. Landau and D.C. Mowery (eds.) Technology and the Wealth of Nations, Stanford, pp. 175-205.
7. Teece, D.J. (1986) 'Firm boundaries, technological innovation, and strategic management', in L.G. Thomas, III (ed.) The Economics of Strategic Planning, Massachusetts, Toronto, pp.187-199.
8. Hanson, W. A. (1985) 'bandwagons and orphans: dynamic pricing of competing technological systems subject to decreasing costs', Dissertation, Stanford University.
9. For a detailed discussion regarding industry analysis see Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy, Free Press.
10. Grindley, P. (1995) Standards, Strategy and Policy: Cases and Stories, Oxford et al.
11. Farrell/Saloner show this argument using a mathematical model. See [10].
12. J. Farrell, and G. Saloner (1986) 'Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements and predation', American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp.940-955.
13. Adams, W. J. and Brock, J.W. (1982) 'Integrated monopoly and market power: system selling, compatibility standards, and market control', Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 22, pp.29-42.
14. Brandenburger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B. J. (1996) Co-opetition, Mew York.
15. Gallini, N. T. and Winter, R. (1985) 'Licensing in the theory of innovation', RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, pp.237-252.
16. Doz, Y.L. and Hamel, G. (1998) Alliance Advantage - The Art of Creating Value through Partnering, Boston.
17. Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, Free Press.
18. Farrell, J. and Gallini, N.T. (1988) 'Second sourcing as a commitment - monopoly incentives to attract competition', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 103, pp.673-694.
19. Sirbu, M.A. and Hughes, K. (1986) 'Standardization of local area networks', Paper Presented at the 14th Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Airlie, Virginia.
20. Rohlfs, J. (1974) 'A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service', Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 5, pp.16-37.
21. Schelling, T. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York, London.
22. Saloner, G. and Shepard, A. and Podolny, J.M. (2001) Strategic Management, John Wiley & Sons.
23. For an early discussion of external consumption benefits and the argument of diminishing marginal benefits with an increasing user base see Leibenstein, H. (1950) 'Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 183-207.
24. Economides, N.S. (1996) 'Network externalities, complementarities, and invitations to enter', European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 12, pp.211-233.
25. Conner, K.R. (1995) 'Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: when can encouraging clones pay', Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp.209-225.
26. For the historical development of the Video Cassette Recorder technology see Rosenbloom, R.S. and Cusumano, M.A. (1987) 'Technological pioneering and competitive advantage: the birth of the VCR industry', California Management Review, Vol. 29, pp.51-76.
27. Lurie, R. and Yoffie, D. (1987) 'The world VCR industry', Harvard Business School Note Nr. 9-387-098, Boston.
28. Cusumano, M.A. and Mylonadis, Y. and Rosenbloom, R.S. (1992) 'Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics: the triumph of VHS over Beta', in Business History Review, Vol. 66, pp.51-94.
29. Grindley, P. and McBryde, R. (1990) 'Standards strategy for personal computers', in J.L. Bergand H. Schumny (Eds.) An Analysis of the Information Technology Standardization Process, North Holland, pp.225-236.
30. Linzmayer, O.B. (1999) Apple Confidential - The Real Story of Apple Computer, Inc., San Francisco.
31. Chposky, J. and Leonis, T. (1998) Blue Magic: The People, Power and Politics Behind the Personal Computer, Oxford
32. Hamel, G. and Doz, Y.L. and Prahalad, C. K. (1989) 'Collaborate with your competitors and win', Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 133-139.
33. Axelrod, R. and Mitchell, W. and Thomas, R. E. and Bennett, D.S. and Bruderer, E. (1995) 'Coalition formation in standard setting alliances', Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp.1493-1508.
34. McDonald, D.W. and Leahey, H. (1985) 'Licensing has a role in technology strategic planning', Research Management, Vol. 17, pp.35-40.
35. The Dolby case study is based on a presentation held by David P. Robinson, Senior Vice President of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. during the seminar Topics in International Technology Management: Technology Standards and Standardization Processes at Stanford University, October 1998.
36. Grindley, P. and Teece, D.J. (1997) 'Managing intellectual capital - licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics', California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.8-41.
37. Jorde, T.M. and Teece, D.J. (1989) 'Competition and cooperation - striking the right balance', California Management Review, Spring, pp.25-37.
38. Morris, C.R. and Ferguson, C.H. (1993) 'How architecture wins technology wars', Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.86-96.
39. For a detailed model approach regarding contrasting styles of industry organization see J. Farrell, H.K. Monroe and G. Saloner (1998) 'The vertical organization of industry: systems competition versus component competition', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp.143-182.
40. This graphic is an adaptation from Grove, A.S. (1996) Only the Paranoid Survive - How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company, New York.
41. Chesbrough, H.W. and Teece, D.J. (1996) 'When is virtual virtuous? - organizing for innovation', Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp.65-73.
42. Yoffie, D.B. and Cusumano, M.A. (1999) 'Judo strategy - the competitive dynamics of internet time', Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp.71-81.
43. Yoffie, D.B. (1996) 'Competing in the age of digital convergence', California Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp.31-53.
44. Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, Carl (1986) 'Product compatibility choice in a market with technological progress', Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 38, Suppl., pp.146-165.
45. Matutes, C. and Regibeau, P. (1988) 'Mix and match: product compatibility without network externalities', RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.221-234.
46. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1992) 'Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces', Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 40, pp.9-35.
47. Xie, J. and Sirbu, M. (1995) 'Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand externalities', Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp.909-926.
48. Adams, R.B. (1978) King C. Gilette: The Man and his Wonderful Shaving Device, Boston.
49. Besen, S.M. (1992): 'AM versus FM: the battle of the bands', Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 1, pp.375-396.
50. Postrel, S.R. (1990) 'Competing networks and proprietary standards: the case of quadraphonic sound', Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 39, pp.170-185.
51. Kende, M. (1994) 'A note on backward compatibility', Economic Letters, Vol. 45, pp.385-389.
52. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999) Information Rules - A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston.
53. For a detailed analysis regarding the role of complementary products see Church, J. and Gandal, N. (1996) 'Strategic entry deterrence: complementary products as installed base', European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 12, pp.331-354.
54. Regarding the role of complementors see also Brandenburger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B.J. (1996) Co-opetition, New York, Currency Doubleday.
55. Besen, S. and Farrell, J. (1994) 'Choosing how to compete: strategies and tactics in standardization', Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, pp.117-131.
56. Within the economics literature this strategy is also called third degree price discrimination. See for example Varian, H.R. (1989) 'Price discrimination', in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willing (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, pp.598-647.
57. Conner, K.R. and Rumelt, R. (1991) 'Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies', Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp.125-139.