Principal component analysis for Riemannian manifolds, with an application to triangular shape spaces

Advances in Applied Probability

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 299-319

  Huckemann, Stephan ^a   Ziezold, Herbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Geodesic; Principal component analysis; Riemannian manifold; Shape analysis

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); GEOMETRY; NUMERICAL METHODS;

GEODESIC; RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLD; SHAPE ANALYSIS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745954917     PISSN: 00018678     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1151337073     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press.
2. Cootes, T. F., Taylor, C. J., Cooper, D. H. and Graham, J. (1992). Training models of shape from sets of examples. In Proc. British Mach. Vision Conf., eds D. C. Hogg and R. D. Boyle, Springer, Berlin, pp. 9-18.
3. Dryden, I. L. and Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
4. Ducham, T. and Stuetzle W. (1996). Extremal properties of principal curves in the plane. Ann. Statist. 24, 1511-1520.
5. Fletcher, P. T., Joshi, S., Lu, C. and Pizer, S. (2004). Gaussian distributions on Lie groups and their applications to statistical shape analysis. Preprint.
6. Fletcher, P. T., Lu, C. and Joshi, S. (2003). Statistics of shapes via principal geodesic analysis on Lie groups. Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2003, Vol. 1, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 95-101.
7. Goodall, C. R. and Lange N. (1998). Growth curve models for correlated triangular shapes. In Proc. 21st INTERFACE Symp., Interface Foundation, Fairfax Station, VA, pp. 445-454.
8. Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33-51.
9. Karcher, H. (1977). Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 30, 509-541.
10. Kendall, D. G., Barden, D., Carne, T. K. and Le, H. (1999). Shape and Shape Theory. Wiley, Chichester.
11. Kent, J. T. (1994). The complex Bingham distribution and shape analysis. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 56, 285-299.
12. Klassen, E., Srivastava, A., Mio, W. and Joshi, S. H. (2004). Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths on shape spaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intellig. 26, 372-383.
13. Kobayashi, S. and Nomizu, K. (1969). Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vol. II. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
14. Kume, A. and Le, H. (2003). On Fréchet means in simplex shape space. Adv. Appl. Prob. 35, 885-897,
15. Le, H. (2001). Locating Fréchet means with application to shape spaces. Adv. Appl. Prob. 33, 324-338.
16. Le, H. and Barden, D. (2001). On simplex shape spaces. J. London Math. Soc. 64, 501-512.
17. Le, H. and Kume, A. (2000). Detection of shape changes in biological features. J. Microscopy 200, 140-147.
18. Le, H. and Small, C. G. (1999). Multidimensional scaling of simplex shapes. Pattern Recognition 32, 1601-1613.
19. Nash, J. (1956). The imbedding problem for Riemannian manifolds. Ann. Math. 63, 20-63.
20. Small, C. G. (1996). The Statistical Theory of Shape. Springer, New York.
21. Ziezold, H. (1977). On expected figures and a strong law of large numbers for random elements in quasi-metric spaces. In Trans. 7th Prague Conf. Inf. Theory, Statist. Decision Functions, Random Process., Vol. A, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 591-602.
22. Ziezold, H. (1994). Mean figures and mean shapes applied to biological figure and shape distributions in the plane. Biometrical J. 36, 491-510.