The symbiosis of entities in the social engagement network: The role of social ventures

Entrepreneurship and Regional Development

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 425-455

  Meyskens, Moriah ^a   Carsrud, Alan L ^b   Cardozo, Richard N ^c  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Economic and social value; Network; Partnerships; Social entrepreneurship; Social venture

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; CORPORATE STRATEGY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENTREPRENEUR; URBAN ECONOMY;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77955861753     PISSN: 08985626     EISSN: 14645114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08985620903168299     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aiken, M., and J. Hage. 1968. Organizational interdependence and inter-organizational structure. American Sociological Review 33, no. 6: 912-930.
2. Aldrich, H.E. 1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Aldrich, H.E. 1999. Organizations evolving. London: Sage.
4. Aldrich, H.E., and M.A. Martinez. 2001. Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25, no. 4: 41-56.
5. Aldrich, H.E., and C. Zimmer. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social networks. In The art and science ofentrepreneurship, ed. D.L. Sexton and R.W. Smilor, 3-24. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
6. Alvord, S.H., D.L. Brown, and C.W. Letts. 2004. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 40, no. 3: 260-82.
7. Audia, PG., F.H. Freeman, and P.D. Reynolds. 2006. Organizational foundings in community context: Instrument manufacturers and their interrelationship with other organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 51, no. 3: 381-419.
8. Austin, J.E. 2000. The collaboration challenge: How non-profits and business succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
9. Austin, J.E., H.H. Stevenson, and J. Wei-Skillern. 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneur-ship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30, no. 1: 1-22.
10. Barendsen, L., and H. Gardner. 2004. Is the social entrepreneur a new type of leader? Leader to Leader 34: 43-50.
11. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, no. 1: 99-120.
12. Becker, G.S. 1964. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Benson, J.K. 1975. The inter-organizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly 20, no. 2: 229-49.
14. Burrus, W. 2006. Microlending: How ACCION USA partners with commercial banks. http://216.235.201.233/NETCOMMUNITY/Document.Doc?id=59.
15. Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
16. Chell, E. 2007. Social enterprise and entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal 25, no. 1: 5-23.
17. Coleman, J.C. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Coviello, N.E. 2006. The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies 37, no. 5: 713-31.
19. Dana, L.P. 1994. A marxist mini-dragon? Entrepreneurship in today's Vietnam. Journal of Small Business Management 32, no. 2: 95-102.
20. Dana, L.P. 2008. Community-based entrepreneurship in Norway. Entrepreneurship and Innovation 9, no. 2: 77-92.
21. Dana, L.P., H. Etemad, and R.W. Wright. 2008. Toward a paradigm of symbiotic entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 5, no. 2: 109-26.
22. Dart, R. 2004. Being 'business-like' in a non-profit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Non-profit and Volunteer Sector Quarterly 33, no. 2: 290-310.
23. Das, T.K., and B. Teng. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23, no. 3: 491-512.
24. Das, T.K., and B. Teng. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 26, no. 1: 31-61.
25. Dees, J.G. 1998a. Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review 76, no. 1: 54-67.
26. Dees, J.G. 1998b. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Draft Report for the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Stanford University. http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/dees_SE.pdf.
27. Dees, J.G., and B.B. Anderson. 2003. For-profit social ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 2: 1-26.
28. Dees, J.G., and B.B. Anderson. 2006. Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. In Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field, ed. R. Mosher-Williams, 39-66. ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series 1, no. 3.
29. Drayton, W. 2002. The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review 44, no. 3: 120-32.
30. Drucker, P.F. 1984. Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review 26, no. 2: 53-63.
31. Dubini, P., and H.E. Aldrich. 1991. Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing 6, no. 5: 305-13.
32. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4: 532-50.
33. Eisenhardt, K.M., and C.B. Schoonhoven. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7, no. 2: 136-50.
34. Emerson, J. 2003. The blending value hypothesis: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review 45, no. 4: 35-51.
35. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
36. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine Sept 13: 122-6.
37. Frumkin, P. 2002. On being non-profit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Galaskiewicz, J., W. Bielefeld, and M. Dowell. 2006. Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Administrative Science Quarterly 51, no. 3: 337-80.
39. Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.
40. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, no. 3: 481-510.
41. Hannan, M.T., and J.H. Freeman. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 5: 929-64.
42. Husted, B.W., and J. De Jesus Salazar. 2006. Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies 43, no. 1: 75-91.
43. Internal Revenue Service. 2008. http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0id=96099,00.html.
44. Kim, P.H., H.E. Aldrich, and L.A. Keister. 2006. Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics 27, no. 1: 5-22.
45. Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review 31, no. 3: 638-58.
46. Leadbeater, C. 1997. The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/theriseofthesocialentrepreneur.pdf.
47. Light, P.C. 2006. Searching for social entrepreneurs: Who they might be, where they might be found, what they do. In Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field, ed. R. Mosher-Williams, 13-38. ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series 1, no. 3.
48. Light, P.C. 2008. The search for social entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution.
49. Low, M.B., and I.C. MacMillan. 1988. Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management 14, no. 2: 139-61.
50. Mair, J., and I. Marti. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal ofWorld Business 41, no. 1: 36-44.
51. Malaviya, P., S. Srivastava, A. Singhal, and P.J. Svenkerud. 2004. Telenor in Bangladesh: The prospect of doing good and doing well? INSEAD Case. Fontainebleau, France. http://www.arvindsinghal.com/grameenbank/Telenor(A)%20Case%20INSEAD-Final.pdf.
52. Min, P.G.M., and C. Jaret. 1985. Ethnic business success: The case of Korean small business in Atlanta. Sociology and Social Research 69, no. 3: 412-35.
53. Mindlin, S.E., and H.E. Aldrich. 1975. Inter-organizational dependence: A review of the concept and a re-examination of the findings of the Aston Group. Administrative Science Quarterly 20, no. 3: 382-92.
54. Morris, M.H., D.F. Kurato, and M. Schindehutte. 2001. Towards integration: Understanding entrepreneurship through frameworks. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2, no. 1: 35-49.
55. Morris, M.H., P.S. Lewis, and D.L. Sexton. 1994. Reconceptualizing entrepreneurship: An input-output perspective. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal 59, no. 1: 21-31.
56. Mort, G.S., J. Weerawardena, and K. Carnegie. 2003. Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. International Journal of Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8, no. 1: 76-88.
57. Moss, T.W., G.T. Lumpkin, and J.C. Short. 2008. The dependent variables of social entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, June 5-7, in Raleigh, NC.
58. Neck, H., C. Brush, and E. Allen. 2008. Exploring social entrepreneurship activity in the United States: For profit ventures generating social and economic value. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, June 5-7, in Raleigh, NC.
59. Nicholls, A. 2005. Measuring impact in social entrepreneurship: New accountabilities to stakeholders and investors? Working Paper, Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
60. Penrose, E.T. 1959. The theory ofthe growth ofthe firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
61. Peredo, A. M., and J.J. Chrisman. 2006. Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy ofManagement Review 31, no. 2: 309-28.
62. Peredo, A.M., and M. McLean. 2006. Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business 41, no. 1: 56-65.
63. Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors. Administrative Science Quarterly 17, no. 2: 218-28.
64. Pfeffer, J., and G. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
65. Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80, no. 12: 57-68.
66. Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84, no. 12: 78-92.
67. Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1-24.
68. Quester, P.G., and B. Thompson. 2001. Advertising and promotion leverage on arts sponsorship effectiveness. Journal ofAdvertising Research 41, no. 1: 33-47.
69. Salamon, L. 1993. The marketization of welfare: Changing non-profit and for profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Science Review 67, no. 1: 16-39.
70. Seelos, C., and J. Mair. 2005. Sustainable development, sustainable profit. European Business Forum 20: 49-53.
71. Seelos, C., and J. Mair. 2007. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy ofManagement Perspectives 21, no. 4: 49-63.
72. Sharir, M., and M. Lerner. 2006. Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business 41, no. 1: 6-20.
73. Southern, A. 2001. What matters is what works? The management of regeneration. Local Economy 16, no. 4: 264-71.
74. Stevenson, H.H. 2008. How to change the world. Harvard Business Review 86, no. 1: 29-33.
75. Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
76. Van Slyke, D.M., and H.K. Newman. 2006. Venture philanthropy and social entrepreneurship in community redevelopment. Non-profit Management and Leadership 16, no. 3: 345-68.
77. Waddock, S.A., and C. Bodwell. 2007. Total responsibility management: The manual. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishers.
78. Weerawardena, J., and G.S. Mort. 2006. Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business 41, no. 1: 21-35.
79. Weisbrod, B.A. 1997. The future of the non-profit sector: Its entwining with private enterprise and government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16, no. 4: 541-55.
80. Welch, D.E., L.S. Welch, L.C. Young, and I.F. Wilkinson. 1998. The importance of networks in export promotion: Policy issues. Journal of International Marketing 6, no. 4: 66-82.
81. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, no. 2: 171-80.
82. Wright, R.W., and L.P. Dana. 2003. Changing paradigms of international entrepreneurship strategy. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1: 135-52.
83. Zietlow, J.T. 2002. Releasing a new wave of social entrepreneurship. Non-profit Management and Leadership 13, no. 1: 85-90.