An economic framework to prioritize confirmatory tests after a high-throughput screen

Journal of Biomolecular Screening

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 680-686

  Swamidass, S Joshua ^a   Bittker, Joshua A ^b   Bodycombe, Nicole E ^b   Ryder, Sean P ^c   Clemons, Paul A ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

automation robotics; chemoinformatics; data analysis software; fluorescence polarization (FP); information management

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ECONOMICS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77955830685     PISSN: 10870571     EISSN: 1552454X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1087057110372803     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Storey J., Dai J., Leek J.: The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments. Biostatistics 2007 ; 8: 414.
2. Rocke D.: Design and analysis of experiments with high throughput biological assay data. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2004 ; 15: 703-713.
3. Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR: Confirmation of primary active substances from high throughput screening of chemical and biological populations: a statistical approach and practical considerations. J Comb Chem 2000 ; 2: 258-265.
4. Brideau C., Gunter B., Pikounis B., Liaw A.: Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 2003 ; 8: 634-647.
5. Seiler K., George G., Happ M., Bodycombe N., Carrinski H., Norton S., et al. ChemBank: a small-molecule screening and cheminformatics resource database. Nucleic Acids Res 2008 ; 36: D351.
6. van der Laan M., Dudoit S., Pollard K.: Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004 ; 3: 1042.
7. van der Laan M., Dudoit S., Pollard K.: Multiple testing: Part II. Step-down procedures for control of the family-wise error rate. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004 ; 3: 1041.
8. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1995 ; 57: 289-300.
9. Reiner A., Yekutieli D., Benjamini Y.: Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics 2003 ; 19: 368-375.
10. Varian HR: Microeconomic Analysis. New York: Norton, 1992.
11. Kroes E., Sheldon R.: Stated preference methods: an introduction. J Transport Econ Policy 1988 ; 22: 11-25.
12. Houthakker H.: Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica 1950 ; 17: 159-174.
13. Schoemaker P.: The expected utility model: its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. J Econ Literature 1982 ; 20: 529-563.
14. Dreiseitl S., Ohno-Machado L.: Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform 2002 ; 35: 352-359.
15. Baldi P., Brunak S.: Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
16. Pagano JM, Farley BM, McCoig LM, Ryder SP: Molecular basis of RNA recognition by the embryonic polarity determinant MEX-5. J Biol Chem 2007 ; 282: 8883-8894.
17. Adams W., Yellen J.: Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Q J Econ 1976 ; 90: 475-498.
18. Scheid S., Spang R.: twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate. Bioinformatics 2005 ; 21: 2921-2922.
19. Scheid S., Spang R.: A stochastic downhill search algorithm for estimating the local false discovery rate. IEEE Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2004 ; 1: 98-108.
20. Clark R., Webster-Clark D.: Managing bias in ROC curves. J Comput Aided Mol Design 2008 ; 22: 141-146.
21. Danziger S., Zeng J., Wang Y., Brachmann R., Lathrop R.: Choosing where to look next in a mutation sequence space: active learning of informative p53 cancer rescue mutants. Bioinformatics 2007 ; 23: i104.
22. Van Leijenhorst D., van der Weide T.: A formal derivation of Heaps law. Inf Sci 2005 ; 170: 263-272.
23. Swamidass SJ, Azencott CA, Lin TW, Gramajo H., Tsai SC, Baldi P.: Influence relevance voting: an accurate and interpretable virtual high throughput screening method. J Chem Inform Model 2009 ; 49: 756-766.
24. Posner BA, Xi H., Mills JEJ: Enhanced HTS hit selection via a local hit rate analysis. J Chem Inf Model 2009 ; 49: 2202-2210.