Patient participation during hospitalization for myocardial infarction: Perceptions among patients and personnel

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 482-489

  Höglund, Anna T ^a   Winblad, Ulrika ^a   Arnetz, Bengt ^b   Arnetz, Judith E ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Focus group interviews; Hospitalization; Myocardial infarction; Patient participation; Perceptions; Sweden

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FOCUS GROUPS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955759886     PISSN: 02839318     EISSN: 14716712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00738.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. The Health and Medical Services Act 1982, SFS 1982:763, Social Ministry, Stockholm, Sweden
2. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1998, 3:448-57.
3. Rachmani R, Levi Z, Slavachevski I, Avin M, Ravid M. Teaching patients to monitor their risk factors retards the progression of vascular complications in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - a randomized prospective study. Diabet Med 2002, 19:385-92.
4. Rost KM, Flavin KS, Cole K, McGill JB. Change in metabolic control and functional status after hospitalization: impact of patient activation intervention in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1991, 14:881-9.
5. Arnetz JE, Almin I, Bergström K, Franzén Y, Nilsson H. Active patient involvement in the establishment of physical therapy goals: effects on treatment outcome and quality of care. Adv Physiother 2004, 6:50-69.
6. Loh A, Leonhart R, Wills CE, Simon D, Härter M. The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 65:69-78.
7. Greenlund KJ, Keenan NL, Giles WH, Zheng ZJ, Neff LJ, Croft JB, Mensah GA. Public recognition of major signs and symptoms of heart attack: seventeen states and the US Virgin Islands, 2001. Am Heart J 2004, 147:101-6.
8. Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Folarow GC, Grundy SM, Hiratzka L, Jones D, Krumholz HM, Mosca L, Pasternak RC, Pearson T, Pfeffer MA, Taubert KA. AHA/ACC Guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation 2006, 113:2363-72.
9. Gammelgaard A, Rossel P, Mortensen OS. Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a Danish study. Soc Sci Med 2002, 58:2313-24. in collaboration with the DANAMI-2 investigators
10. Frosch DL, Kaplan RN. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med 1999, 17:285-94.
11. Petrie KJ, Weinman J, Sharpe N, Buckley J. Role of patients' view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: longitudinal study. BMJ 1996, 312:1191-4.
12. Wiles R, Kinmonth A-L. Patients' understandings of heart attack: implications for prevention of recurrence. Patient Educ Couns 2001, 44:161-9.
13. Burke LE, Fair J. Promoting prevention. Skill sets and attributes of health care providers who deliver behavioral interventions. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003, 18:256-66.
14. Hassen TA, Nordrehaug JE, Hanestad BR. A qualitative study of the information needs of acute myocardial infarction\patients, and their preferences for follow-up contact after discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005, 4:337-44.
15. Decker C, Garavalia L, Chen C, Buchanan DM, Nugent K, Shipman A, Spertus JA. Acute myocardial infarction patients' information needs over the course of treatment and recovery. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2007, 22:459-65.
16. Arnetz JE, Winblad U, Arnetz BB, Höglund AT. Physicians' and nurses' perceptions of patient involvement in myocardial infarction care. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2008, 7:113-20.
17. Arnetz JE, Höglund AT, Arnetz BB, Winblad U. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for measuring patient views of involvement in myocardial infarction care. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2008, 7:229-38.
18. Patton M. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 1990, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Inc, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi
19. Malterud K. Kvalitativa Metoder i Medicinsk Forskning (Qualitative Methods in Medical Research) 1998, Studentlitteratur, Lund
20. Guba E, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation 1989, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, London and New Delhi
21. Webb C, Kevern J. Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2000, 33:798-805.
22. Kälvemark S, Höglund AT, Hansson MG, Westerholm P, Arnetz B. Living with conflicts. ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Soc Sci Med 2004, 58:1075-84.
23. Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Lewinson N. Informed decision-making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999, 282:2313-20.
24. Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision-making. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:829-40.
25. McGuire AL, McCullough LB, Weller SC, Whitney SN. Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care 2005, 43:466-70.
26. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The phenomena of participation and non-participation in health care - experiences of patients attending a nurse-led clinic for chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004, 3:239-46.
27. Eldh AC, Ehnfors M, Ekman I. The meaning of patient participation for patients and nurses at a nurse-led clinic for chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006, 5:45-53.
28. Sahlsten MJM, Larsson IE, Plos KAE, Lindencrona SCS. Hindrance for patient participation in nursing care. Scand J Caring Sci 2005, 19:223-9.
29. Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision-making: who really wants to participate? Med Care 2000, 38:335-41.