Introduction: Trading under the buttonwood-a foreword to the markets for technology and ideas

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 767-773

  Fosfuri, Andrea ^a   Giarratana, Marco S ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORPORATE STRATEGY; STOCK MARKET; TRADE;

EID: 77955750181     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtq025     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Argyres, N. S., J. Bercovitz and K. J. Mayer. (2007), 'Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: an empirical study of IT services contracts,' Organization Science, 18(1), 3-19.
2. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella. (2001), Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
3. Arora, A. and A. Gambardella. (2010), 'Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology,' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
4. Business Wire (2008), Rambus files patent infringement suit against NVIDIA, 10 July 2008, pp. 42-43.
5. Ceccagnoli, M., S. J. H. Graham, M. J. Higgins and J. Lee (2010), 'Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms' demand for technology innovations,' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
6. Cockburn, I. M., M. J. MacGarvie and E. Müller (2010), 'Patent thickets, licensing and innovative performance,' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
7. Dosi, G. (1988), 'Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation,' Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120-1171.
8. The Economist (2009), InnoCentive: a market for ideas, 17 September 2009
9. Evans, Y. (2005), 'The Eureka myth,' Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 18-19.
10. Fosfuri, A. (2006), 'The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing,' Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), 1141-1158.
11. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern (2003), 'The product market and the market for "ideas": commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs,' Research Policy, 32(2), 333-350.
12. Gans, J. S. and S. Stern (2010), 'Is there a market for ideas?' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
13. Giarratana, M. S. (2004), 'The birth of a new industry: entry by start-ups and the drivers of firm growth. The case of encryption software,' Research Policy, 35(2), 787-806.
14. Laursen, K., M. Leone and S. Torrisi (2010), 'Technological exploration through licensing: new insights from the licensee's point of view,' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
15. Lichtenthaler, U. (2009), 'The role of corporate technology strategy and patent portfolios in low-, medium-and high-technology firms,' Research Policy, 38(3), 559-569.
16. Pisano, G. P. (2006), 'Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech,' Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 114-124.
17. Reitzig, M., J. Henkel and F. Schneider (2010), 'Collateral damage for R&D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology,' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
18. Sakakibara, M. (2010), 'An empirical analysis of pricing in patent licensing contracts,' Industrial Corporate Change, this issue.
19. Teece, D. (1986), 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy,' Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
20. Winter, S. G. (2003), 'Understanding dynamic capabilities,' Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.