Local state policy and 'new-build gentrifi cation' in montréal: The role of the 'population factor' in a fragmented governance context

Population, Space and Place

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 413-428

  Rose, Damaris ^a  

^a CENTRE URBANISATION CULTURE SOCIÉTÉ   (Canada)

Author keywords

Housing policy; Local state; Montr al; Municipal fragmentation; New build gentrification; Sociodemographic balance

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; ENTREPRENEUR; GENTRIFICATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HOMEOWNERSHIP; HOUSING POLICY; NEIGHBORHOOD; NEOLIBERALISM; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN POLICY; URBAN POPULATION; URBAN RENEWAL;

CANADA; MONTREAL; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 77955746356     PISSN: 15448444     EISSN: 15448452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/psp.592     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aubin H. 1995. Montreal's 'doughnut effect' remains a pressing problem. The Gazette (Montréal), 17 January, B3.
2. Bacher JC. 1993. Keeping to the Marketplace: The Evolution of Canadian Housing Policy. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montréal & Kingston.
3. Beal V, Rousseau M. 2008. Néolibéraliser la ville fordiste. Métropoles 4: (on-line pagination). Available at http://metropoles.revues.org/document3502.html [accessed 3 July 2009].
4. Beauregard RA. 1994. Voices of Decline: The Postwar Fate of US Cities. Blackwell: Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, UK.
5. Beaverstock JV, Smith RG, Taylor PJ. 1999. A roster of world cities. Cities 16: 445-458. Available at http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00042-6 [accessed 3 July 2009].
6. Blary R. 1985. Vocation et pouvoirs nouveaux des municipalités en matière d'habitation. Actualité immobilière 9: 15-35.
7. Bohémier J-J, Rouleau J. 1998. A new resource to revitalize the Hochelaga-Maisonneuve neighbourhood. Canadian Housing/Habitation canadienne 15: 20-22.
8. Brenner N, Theodore N. 2002. Cities and the geographies of 'actually existing neoliberalism'. Antipode 34: 349-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
9. Cameron DM. 1980. Provincial responsibilities for municipal government. Canadian Public Administration 23: 222-235.Available at http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1980.tb00054.x [accessed 3 July 2009].
10. Carter T, McAfee A. 1990. The municipal role in housing the homeless and the poor. In Housing the Homeless and the Poor: New Partnerships among the Private, Public and Third Sectors, Fallis G, Murray A (eds): University of Toronto Press: Toronto; 226-263.
11. Charbonneau F, Parenteau R. 1991. Opération 20,000 Logements et l'espace social de Montréal. Recherches sociographiques 237-254.
12. Collin J-P. 1998. La dynamique intramétropolitaine dans l'agglomération montréalaise. In Barcelona-Montréal. Développement urbain comparé, Capel H, Linteau P-A (eds): Universitad de Barcelona: Barcelona; 63-82.
13. Collin J-P, Le ́veille ́e J, with Rivard M, Robertson M. 2003. Municipal Organization in Canada: Tradition and Transformation, Varying from Province to Province. Villes Régions Monde, Groupe de recherche sur l'innovation municipale (GRIM). INRSUrbanisation, Culture et Société and Centre per la Innovació Local (CIL): Montréal and Barcelona. Available at http://www.vrm.ca/documents/ ICPS_EN.pdf [accessed 3 July 2009].
14. Cournoyer F. 1998. Accéder à la propriété dans la ville centre ou dans sa banlieue. In Trajectoires familiales et espaces de vie en milieu urbain, Grafmeyer Y, Dansereau F (eds): Presses Universitaires de Lyon: Lyon; 221-233.
15. D'Amours M. 1994. Le soleil se lève à l'est. L'Actualité, 1 oct. (Vol. 19, no. 15), Solidarité, 38.
16. Divay G, Gaudreau M. 1984. La formation des espaces résidentiels: le système de production de l'habitat urbain dans les années soixante-dix au Québec. INRS-Urbanisation/Presses de l'Université du Que ́bec: Montréal/Québec.
17. Felt E. 2007. Patching the Fabric of the Neighborhood: The Practical Challenges of Infi ll Housing Development for CDCs. Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University and NeighborWorks America: Cambridge, MA. http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/ publications/communitydevelopment/w07-4.pdf
18. Gaudreau M, Mathews G. 1992. Politique municipale et enjeux d'habitation en ville centrale: le cas de Montréal. Rapport de recherche. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation: Ottawa.
19. Germain A, Rose D. 2000. Montréal: The Quest for a Metropolis. The World's Cities. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.
20. Graham KA, Phillips SD, Maslove AM. 1998. Urban Governance in Canada: Representation, Resources, and Restructuring. Harcourt Brace Canada: Toronto.
21. Gruda A. 1992. Etalement urbain: stopper le big bang. La Presse (Montréal), 25 mai, E ́ditorial, B2.
22. Hackworth J, Smith N. 2001. The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografi e 92: 464-477.Available at http:// dx.doi.org/:10.1111/1467-9663.00172 [accessed 3 July 2009].
23. Hamel P, Jouve B. 2008. In search of a stable urban regime for Montreal: issues and challenges in metropolitan development. Urban Research & Practice 1: 18-35.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 17535060701795322 [accessed 3 July 2009].
24. Harvey D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografi ska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 71: 3-17.Available at http://www.jstor. org/stable/490503 [accessed 3 July 2009].
25. Hulchanski D. 1984. St. Lawrence and False Creek: A Review of the Planning and Development of Two New Inner City Neighbourhoods. UBC Planning Papers, no. 10. University of British Columbia, School of Community and Regional Planning: Vancouver.
26. Hulchanski JD, Eberle M, Lytton M, Olds K. 1990. The Municipal Role in the Supply and Maintenance of Low Cost Housing: A Review of Canadian Initiatives. Report prepared for the Centre for Future Studies in Housing and Living Environment, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. University of British Columbia, Centre for Human Settlements: Vancouver.
27. Hulchanski JD. 2006. What factors shape Canadian housing policy? The intergovernmental role in Canada's housing system. In Canada: The State of the Federation 2004: Municipal-Federal-Provincial Relations in Canada, Young R, Leuprecht C (eds): McGill-Queen's University Press: Montréal & Kingston; 221-247.
28. Kipfer S, Keil R. 2002. Toronto Inc? Planning the competitive city in the new Toronto. Antipode 34: 227-264.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-8330.00237 [accessed 3 July 2009].
29. Laberge Y. 1993. La planche de salut d'Hochelaga-Maisonneuve: son réseau communautaire. La Presse (Montréal), 20 février, A4.
30. Lacroix B. 1989. Analyse de l'Opération 20,000 logements de la Ville de Montréal et de ses principales réalisation. Thesis, Master's in Urban Planning, School of Urban Planning, McGill University, Montréal.
31. Lapointe J-L. 1980. La réforme de la fi scalité municipale au Québec. Canadian Public Administration 23: 269-280.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1754-7121.1980.tb00057.x [accessed 3 July 2009].
32. Larner W, Craig D. 2005. After neoliberalism? Community activism and local partnerships in Aotearoa New Zealand. Antipode 37: 402-424.Available http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00504.x [accessed 3 July 2009].
33. Lees L, Slater T, Wyly E. 2007. Gentrifi cation. Routledge: New York and London.
34. Lemieux M. 1996. Chou Montréal et chèvre banlieue. Le Devoir (Montréal), 9 mai, Idées, A7.
35. Léonard J-F, Léveillée J. 1987. The Montréal Citizens' Movement comes to power. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 11: 567-580.
36. Léveillée J. 1988. Pouvoir local et politiques publiques à Montréal: renouveau dans les modalités d'exercice du pouvoir urbain. Cahiers de recherche sociologique 11: 37-64.
37. Ley D. 1996. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
38. Ley DF, Bourne LS. 1993. Introduction: The social context and diversity of urban Canada. In The Changing Social Geography of Canadian Cities, Bourne LS, Ley DF (eds): Canadian Association of Geographers Series in Canadian Geography. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montréal and Kingston; 3-30.
39. Lustiger-Thaler H, Shragge E. 1998. The new urban left: parties without actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22: 233-244.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00137 [accessed 3 July 2009].
40. Montréal [Ville]. 1981. Operation 10,000 Dwellings. Commission d'initiative et de développement économiques de Montréal (CIDEM): Montréal.
41. Montréal [Ville]. 1989a. Habiter Montréal: La Commission rend public son rapport fi nal. Communiqué Ville de Montre ́al, Commission de l'aménagement, de l'habitation et des travaux publics.
42. Montréal [Ville]. 1989b. Habiter Montréal: A Policy Statement on Housing - City of Montréal. Ville de Montréal.
43. Montréal [Ville]. 1990a. Habiter Montréal: Politique d'habitation. Montréal: Ville de Montréal, Service de l'habitation et du développement urbain. 428 D. Rose Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Popul. Space Place 16, 413-428 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/psp
44. Montréal [Ville]. 1990b. Bulletin Habiter Montréal en bref: Ville de Montréal, Service de l'habitation et du développement urbain.
45. Montréal [Ville]. 2000. Programme de crédit de taxes:10 ans après sa mise en place, un bilan positif. In Cahier d'information économique et budgétaire 2000. Ville de Montréal; 53-64.
46. Montréal [Ville]. 2005. Strategy for the Inclusion of Affordable Housing in New Residential Projects. Habiter Montréal Ville de Montréal: Montréal. Montréal [Ville]. Habiter
47. Montréal. 2007. Best housing practices, Montréal examples. Presentation, Toronto, 28 June 2007. Available at http://ville.montreal.qc.ca/ pls/portal/docs/page/habiter_v2_fr/media/ documents/presentation_toronto_28_juin_2007.pdf [accessed 3 July 2009].
48. Musterd S, Andersson R. 2005. Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review 40: 761-790.Available at http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1078087405276006 [accessed 3 July 2009].
49. Noël A. 1990. Montréal 90. L'exode vers la banlieue saigne Montréal. La Presse (Montréal), 3 novembre, Plus, B4.
50. Ogden PE, Schnoebelen F. 2005. The rise of the small household: demographic change and household structure in Paris. Population, Space and Place 11: 251-268.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ psp.370 [accessed 3 July 2009].
51. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2004. OECD Territorial Reviews. Montreal, Canada. OECD: Paris.
52. Parenteau R, Charbonneau F, Beaudoin C. 1984. L'opération 10,000 logements (Montreal): evaluation des objectifs socio-economiques Notes de recherche. Université de Montréal, Faculté de l'Aménagement: Montréal.
53. Rose D. 2004. Discourses and experiences of social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods: a Montréal case study Canadian Journal of Urban Research/Revue canadienne de recherche urbaine 13: 278-316.
54. Rose D. 2006. Les atouts des quartiers en voie de gentrifi cation: du discours municipal à celui des acheteurs. Le cas de Montréal. Sociétés contemporaines: 39-61.
55. Rose D, Villeneuve P. 2006. Life stages, living arrangements and lifestyles. In Canadian Cities in Transition: Local through Global Perspectives. Third Edition, Bunting T, Filion P (eds): Oxford University Press Canada: Toronto; 138-153.
56. Roslin A. 1992. Condos 1800, People 0. How John Gardiner put down a revolt in Little Burgundy. Montreal Mirror, 24 Sept-1 Oct, 7. Rouleau J. 1997. Projet de revitalisation urbaine et sociale d'un quartier de Montréal. Interaction communautaire, Bulletin du Regroupement des intervenants et intervenantes en action communautaire en CLSC (RQIIAC) 40-41.
57. Seo JK. 2003. Re-urbanisation in regenerated areas of Manchester and Glasgow: new residents and the problems of sustainability. Cities 19: 113-121.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00006-9 [accessed 3 July 2009].
58. Smith N. 2002. New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as a global urban strategy. Antipode 34: 427-445.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-8330.00249 [accessed 3 July 2009].
59. Société d'habitation du Québec. 2000. Évaluation du programme de revitalisation des vieux quartiers. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, Société d'habitation du Québec.
60. Spurr P. 1976. Land and Urban Development: A Preliminary Study. James Lorimer: Toronto.
61. Trottier É. 1990. La gangrène de la drogue atteint Hochelaga-Maisonneuve; un tissu social à refaire. La Presse, 25 août Plus, B6.
62. Uitermark J, Duyvendak JW, Kleinhans R. 2007. Gentrifi cation as a governmental strategy: social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A 39: 125-141.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10:1068/a39142 [accessed 3 July 2009].
63. Ward K, Jonas AEG. 2004. Competitive cityregionalism as a politics of space: a critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism. Environment and Planning A 36: 2119-2139.Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a36223 [accessed 3 July 2009].