Discourses and experiences of social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods: A Montréal case study

Canadian Journal of Urban Research

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 278-316

  Rose, Damaris ^a  

^a CENTRE URBANISATION CULTURE SOCIÉTÉ   (Canada)

Author keywords

Condominiums; Gentrification; Infill development; Montr al; Municipal housing policy; Social diversity; Social mix

Indexed keywords

GENTRIFICATION; INNER CITY AREA; SOCIAL STATUS; URBAN POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

CANADA; MONTREAL; NORTH AMERICA; QUEBEC [CANADA]; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

HIATUS;

EID: 14644414213     PISSN: 11883774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Amin, Ash, Doreen Massey and Nigel Thrift. 2000. Cities For the Many Not the Few. Bristol: Policy Press.
2. Arthurson, Kathy. 2002. Housing Tenure, Social Mix and Creating Inclusive Communities. Proceedings: Toward Inclusion - State Anti-Poverty Conference 2002, 22-36. SACOSS, South Australian Council of Social Service. http://www.sacoss.org.au/antipov/proceedings.pdf
3. Atkinson, Rowland. 2002. Does Gentrification Help or Harm Urban Neighbourhoods? An Assessment of the Evidence-Base in the Context of the New Urban Agenda. Bristol, UK: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research, CNR Paper no. 5. http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk
4. Atkinson, Rowland. 2003a. Domestication by Cappucino or a revenge on urban space? Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces. Urban Studies 40 (9): 1829-1843.
5. Atkinson, Rowland. 2003b. Introduction: Misunderstood saviour or vengeful wrecker? The many meanings and problems of gentrification. Urban Studies 40:2343-2350.
6. Authier, Jean-Yves. 2002. Habiter son quartier et vivre en ville : les rapports résidentiels des habitants des centres anciens. Espaces et sociétés 1-2 (108/109): 89-109.
7. Justin Beaumont, Justin and Chris Hamnett. 2001. The Spatial Dimensions of Urban Social Exclusion and Integration:4 The Case of London, United Kingdom. URBEX Series, No. 15. URBEX [research project "The Spatial Dimensions of Urban Social Exclusion and Integration: A European Comparison"] (European Union, 4th framework programme on Targeted Socio-Economic Research (TSER)), University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences; available on-line from http:// www2.fmg.uva.nl/urbex/resrep/r15_london.pdf
8. Beauregard, Robert A. 2002. Voices of Decline: The Postwar Fate of US Cities. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9. Bernt, Mathias and Andrej Holm. 2003. Gentrification of a particular type: the case of Prenzlauer Berg. Paper presented at the "Challenging Urban Identities" conference, International Sociological Association Research Committee 21, Sociology of Urban and Regional Development, Milan, 25-27 September.
10. Bidou-Zachariasen, Catherine. 2003. Introduction in Retours en ville : des processus de « gentrification » urbaine aux politiques de revitalisation des centres, edited by C. Bidou-Zachariasen, 9-44. Paris : Descartes.
11. Chanal, Martine and Marc Uhry. 2003. La pauvreté est-elle soluble dans la mixité? Hommes et migrations (1245): 91-101.
12. Blokland. Talja. 2003. Does neighborhood matter? Social networks, social support and neighborhood diversity in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and New Haven, USA. Paper presented at the "Challenging Urban Identities" conference, International Sociological Association Research Committee 21, Sociology of Urban and Regional Development, Milan, 25-27 September; available from author, University of Amsterdam.
13. Blomley, Nicholas. 1998. Landscapes of property. Law & Society Review 32 (3): 567-612.
14. Bondi, Liz. 1999. Gender, class and gentrification: enriching the debate. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17: 261-282.
15. Bordone, Sabrina. 2003. Siting Supportive Housing Facilities: An Analysis of Lessons Learned. Current Issues Paper, Master's Program in Urban Planning, Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto. Unpublished report; available on-line from http:// www.geog.utoronto.ca/programs/planning/planning%20new/recentwork/ 2002/CIP/supportivehousing.pdf.
16. Bourne, Larry S. 1993. Close together and worlds apart: an analysis of changes in the ecology of income in Canadian cities. Urban Studies 30 (8): 1293-1317.
17. Bridge, Gary. 1994. Gentrification, class and residence: a reappraisal. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12 (1): 31-51.
18. British Columbia. Housing Ministry. 1996. Toward More Inclusive Neighbourhoods: Check out these Resources! On-line publication; available on-line from http://www.mcaws.gov.bc.ca/housing/NEIGHBOUR/ index.htm
19. Butler, Tim. 1997. Gentrification and the Middle Classes. Aldershot: Ashcroft.
20. Butler, Tim and Garry Robson. 2001. Social capital, gentrification and neighbourhood change in London: a comparison of three South London neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 38 (12): 2145-2162.
21. Butler, Tim and Garry Robson. 2003a. Negotiating their way in: the middle classes, gentrification and the deployment of capital in a globalising metropolis. Urban Studies 40 (9): 1791-1809.
22. Butler, Tim and Garry Robson. 2003b. Plotting the middle classes: gentrification and circuits of education in London. Housing Studies 18 (1): 5-28
23. Butler, Tim and Garry Robson. 2004. London Calling: The Middle Classes and the Remaking of Inner London.
24. Canadian Housing / Habitation canadienne. 2003. What progress under federal-provincial/territorial agreements? (article based on multiple contributions, edited by G. Suttor) Canadian Housing / Habitation canadienne 20 (1): 11-16.
25. Carroll, Barbara Wake. 2002. Housing policy in the new millennium: the uncompassionate landscape. In Urban Policy Issues: Canadian Perspectives, ed. E.P. Fowler and D. Siegel 2002, 69-89. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
26. Caulfield, Jon. 1994. City Form and Everyday Life: Toronto's Gentrification and Critical Social Practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27. Charbonneau, François and René Parenteau. 1991. Opération 20 000 logements et l'espace social de Montréal. Recherches sociographiques XXXII (2): 237-254.
28. Collectif en aménagement urbain Hochelaga-Maisonneuve. 2002. Consultation locale sur le re-développement du site Lavo. Document synthèse. www.cam.org/~cauhm/infolavo/syntheselavo.pdf.
29. Comité habitation Sud-Ouest. 2002. Construire un espace équitable - ou comment gérer la revitalisation. Montréal: Regroupement pour la relance économique et sociale du Sud-Ouest.
30. Crump, Jeff. 2002. Deconcentration by demolition: public housing, poverty, and urban policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20 (5): 581-596.
31. Dansereau, Francine. 1988. Les transformations de l'habitat et des quartiers centraux : singularités et contrastes des villes canadiennes. Cahiers de recherche sociologique 6 (2): 95-114.
32. Dansereau, Francine. 2003. Social mix as public policy and private experience. Paper presented at the "Challenging Urban Identities" conference, International Sociological Association Research Committee 21, Sociology of Urban and Regional Development, Milan, 25-27 September; available from author, INRS-Urbanisation, Culture et Société, Montréal.
33. Dansereau, Francine, Stéphane Charbonneau, Richard Morin, Anne Revillard, Damaris Rose et Anne-Marie Séguin. 2003. La mixité sociale en habitation. Rapport de recherche réalisé pour le Service de l'habitation de la Ville de Montréal. Montréal : INRS-Urbanisation, Culture et Société.
34. De Sousa, Christopher A. 2002. Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: an examination of past trends and future prospects. Land Use Policy 19 (4): 297-309.
35. Dear, Michael and Jennifer Wolch. 1987. Landscapes of Despair: From Deinstitutionalization to Homelessness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. Devoir, Le. 2002a. Une coalition veut redonner le Centre-Sud à ses habitants. Le nouveau groupe dénonce le monopole de l'État sur le choix des priorités communautaires by Brian Myles, 18 janvier, A3.
37. Devoir, Le. 2000b. Pas de pauvres dans ma cour. Le projet de construction du 75 logements sociaux fait problème à Pointe-aux-Trembles by Josée Boileau, 21 novembre, A1.
38. Ducheny, Marie. 2002. Le programme de revitalisation des quartiers centraux de la Ville de Montréal. Unpublished paper; available at Centre de documentation, INRS-Urbanisation, Culture et Société, Montréal.
39. Duff, Jocelyn. 2000. Densification résidentielle en quartier central: le cas du Mile-End à Montréal. Research Report, External Research Grants Program. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
40. Filion, Pierre. 1987. Concepts of the inner city and recent trends in Canada. Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 31 (3): 223-232.
41. Filion, Pierre. 1991. The gentrification-social structure dialectic: a Toronto case study. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 15 (4): 553-574.
42. Flety, Laurent. 2004. Forthcoming. L'implantation de logements sociaux dans les quartiers montréalais : du droit au logement à une politique d'habitat ? Rapport de stage d'ingénieur-maître, Université de Provence (supervised by D. Rose and G. Divay). Montréal: INRS-Urbanisation, Culture et Société.
43. Florida, Richard. 2003. Cities and the creative class. City & Community 2 (1): 3-20.
44. Friedrichs, Jürgen, George Galster and Sako Musterd. 2003. Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: The European and American research and policy context. Housing Studies 18: 797-806.
45. Gauthier, Joël. 2001. La remise en question de l'État-providence par les décideurs politiques québécois. Une analyse des discours budgétaires de la période 1976-2000. Unpublished master's thesis, Université de Sherbrooke. http://www.irec.net/publications/ 257.pdf
46. Germain, Annick and Damaris Rose. 2000. Montréal: The Quest for a Metropolis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
47. Germain, Annick, Julie Archambault, Bernadette Blanc, Johanne Charbonneau, Francine Dansereau and Damaris Rose. 1995. Cohabitation interethnique et vie de quartier. Final report to the Québec Ministry of International Affairs, Immigration and Cultural Communities and to the Ville de Montréal. Government of Québec, Les Publications du Québec, MAIICCQ, Direction des communications, Collection Études et recherches, no 12.
48. Glass, Ruth. 1964. Introduction: Aspects of change. In London: Aspects of Change, ed. Centre for Urban Studies 1964, xiii-xlii. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
49. Grey, Cameron. 1999. Vancouver struggles with housing issues. Canadian Housing / Habitation canadienne 16 (1): 15-17.
50. Hackworth, Jason and Neil Smith. 2001. The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92 (4): 464-77.
51. Hackworth, Jason. 2002. Postrecession gentrification in New York City. Urban Affairs Review 37: 815-843.
52. Hall, Ray and Philip E Ogden. 2003. The rise of living alone in Inner London: trends among the population of working age. Environment and Planning A 35 (5): 871-888.
53. Hamnett, Chris. 2000. Gentrification, postindustrialism and industrial and occupational restructuring in global cities. In A Companion to the City, ed. G. Bridge and S. Watson, 331-341. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Harris, Richard. 1993. Social mix, housing tenure and community development. In House, Home and Community: Housing Progress in Canada, 1945-1986, ed. J. Miron, 308-319. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
55. Harvey, David. 1987. Flexible accumulation through urbanization: reflections on 'post-modernism' in the American city. Antipode 19: 260-286.
56. Holt, Malcolm J. (Humanité Services Planning BC Ltd). 1991. The Social and Geographical Impacts of Gentrification on Vancouver's West Side. Research Report, External Research Grants Program. Ottawa: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
57. Keil, Roger. 2002. "Common-sense" neo-liberalism: Progressive-Conservative urbanism in modern Canada. Antipode 34 (3): 578-601
58. Kernstein, R. 1990. Stage models of gentrification: an examination. Urban Affairs Quarterly 35 (4): 620-639.
59. Lambert, Christine and Martin Boddy. 2002 Transforming the City: Post-Recession Gentrification and Re-urbanisation. Bristol, UK: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research, CNR Paper no. 6; available on-line from http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk
60. Lees, Loretta. 1997. Ageographia, heterotopia, and Vancouver's new public library. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 (3):321-347.
61. Lees, Loretta. 2000. A reappraisal of gentrification: towards a 'geography of gentrification'. Progress in Human Geography 24 (3): 389-408.
62. Lees, Loretta. 2003a. Commentary. Policy (re)turns: gentrification research and urban policy - urban policy and gentrification research. Environment and Planning A 35 (3): 571-574.
63. Lees, Loretta. 2003b. Visions of 'urban renaissance': the Urban Task Force Report and the Urban White Paper. In Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy, ed. R. Imrie & M. Baco, 66-82. Bristol: Policy Press.
64. Lehman-Frisch, Sonia. 2002. 'Like a village': les habitants et leur rue commerçante dans Noe Valley, un quartier gentrifié de San Francisco. Espaces et Sociétés (108/109): 49-68.
65. Levy, Paul R., and Roman A. Cybriwsky. 1980. The hidden dimensions of culture and class: Philadelphia. In Back to the City, ed. S.B. Laska and D. Spain, 138-155. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
66. Ley, David. 1985. Gentrification in Canadian Inner Cities: Patterns, Analysis, Impacts and Policy. Research Report submitted to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Department of Geography.
67. Ley, David. 1994. Gentrification and the politics of the new middle class. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12 (1): 53-74.
68. Ley, David. 1996. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Ley, David and Caroline Mills. 1986. Gentrification and reform politics in Montréal, 1982. Cahiers de géographie du Québec 30: 419-427.
70. Ley, David. 2000. The inner city. In Canadian Cities in Transition: The Twenty-first Century. 2nd edition, ed. T. Bunting and P. Filion. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 274-302.
71. Mercer, John. 1992. Montréal en Amérique du Nord. In Montréal: Tableaux d'un espace en transformation, ed. F. Remiggi and G. Sénécal. Montréal: Association canadienne-française pour l'avancement de sciences, Cahiers scientifiques no 76: 49-68.
72. Mitchell, Don. 1997. The Annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. Antipode 29 (3): 303-335.
73. Montréal. Ville. 1989. Habiter Montréal: A Policy Statement on Housing. Montréal : City of Montreal.
74. Montréal. Ville. 2000. Programme de crédit de taxes: 10 ans après sa mise en place, un bilan positif. In Cahier d'information économique et budgétaire 2000, 53-64. Montréal.
75. Montréal, Ville. 2002. Budget de 2003. Cahier d'information complémentaire. Montréal.
76. Montréal. Ville, Cabinet du maire et du comité exécutif and Direction de l'habitation. 2003. Solidarité 5 000 logements. La livraison de logements sociaux et communautaires est fortement accélérée. Communiqué, 14 janvier. http://www2.ville.montreal.qc.ca/habiter/communiques/ communique_14janv2003_5000.pdf
77. Montréal. Ville, Cabinet du maire et du comité exécutif, and Société d'habitation du Québec. 2003. "La Ville de Montréal et le gouvernement du Québec doublent leur contribution. 85,7 millions $ pour revitaliser les quartiers de Montréal." Communiqué, 3 mars; available at http:// www2.ville.montreal.gc.ca/habiter/communiques/communique_3mars.pdf
78. Montréal. Ville, Cabinet du comité exécutif. 2002. L'utilisation des bâtiments vacants à des fins d'habitation sociale est une priorité pour l'Administration Tremblay-Zampino. Communiqué. 9 août; available at http:// www2.ville.montreal.qc.ca/habiter/communiques/comm_09-08-02.htm
79. Moss, Mitchell L. 1997. Reinventing the central city as a place to live and work. Housing Policy Debate 8: 471-490.
80. Neumann, Mary, Sean Meagher and Tony Boston. 2004. Regent Park Community Services and Facilities Study. Toronto: Toronto Community Housing. http://www.regentparkplan.ca/pdfs/study_reports/ RPark_services_facilities.pdf
81. Pinçon, Michel & Monique Pinçon-Charlot. 2001. Paris mosaïque. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
82. Pinçon, Michel and Monique Pinçon-Charlot. 2002. Entre-soi ou mixité sociale? Liaisons - pôle de recherche urbaine des Pays de la Loire (20): 1-6. http://www.predat.net/documents/ L20.pdf
83. Podmore, Julie. 2001. Lesbians in the Crowd: gender, sexuality and visibility along Montréal's Boul. St-Laurent. Gender, Place and Culture 8 (4): 333-355.
84. Pomeroy, Steve. 1999. Municipalities providing new leadership in affordable housing. Canadian Housing / Habitation canadienne 16 (1): 7-10.
85. Presse, La. 2003. Immobilier. Vendre la ville, dans toute son imperfection by Tristan Péloquin, 8 mars, J4.
86. Préteceille, Edmond. 2003. Is public housing contributing to an increase of segregation? Recent trends in the Paris metropolis. Paper presented at the "Challenging Urban Identities" conference, International Sociological Association Research Committee 21, Sociology of Urban and Regional Development, Milan, 25-27 September; available from author, Observatoire Sociologique du Changement, FNSP-CNRS, Paris.
87. Ray, Brian and Damaris Rose. 2000. Cities of the everyday: socio-spatial perspectives on gender, difference and diversity. In Canadian Cities in Transition: The Twenty-First Century, ed. T. Bunting and P. Filion, 402-424. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
88. Robson, Garry and Tim Butler. 2001. Coming to terms with London: middle-class communities in a global city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (1): 70-86.
89. Rose, Damaris. 1984. Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2 (1): 47-74.
90. Rose, Damaris. 1995. Le Mile-End: un quartier cosmopolite? In Cohabitation interethnique et vie de quartier, ed. Germain et al., 53-94. Rapport final soumis au ministère des Affaires internationales, de l'Immigration et des Communautés culturelles et à la Ville de Montréal. Québec, Les Publications du Québec, MAIICCQ, Direction des communications, Études et recherches no 12.
91. Rose, Damaris. 1996. Economic restructuring and the diversification of gentrification in the 1980s: a view from a marginal metropolis. In City Lives and City Forms: Critical Research and Canadian Urbanism, ed. J. Caulfield and L. Peake, 131-172. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
92. Rose, Damaris. 1999. Urban hierarchies and the changing characteristics of 'urban professionals' in Toronto and Montréal: between convergence and divergence. Canadian Journal of Regional Science / Revue canadienne des sciences régionales XXII (1/2): 133-142.
93. Ruddick, Susan. 1990. The Montreal Citizens' Movement: The Realpolitik of the 1990s? In Fire in the Hearth: The Radical Politics of Place in America (The Year Left, vol. 4), ed. M. Dabis, S. Hiatt, M. Kennedy, S. Ruddick and M. Sprinker, 287-316. London and New York: Verso.
94. Schill, Michael H., Ingrid Gould Ellen, Amy Ellen Schwartz & Ioan Voicu. 2001. Revitalizing Inner-city neighborhoods: New York City's ten-year plan. Housing Policy Debate 13 (3): 529-566.
95. Sénécal, Gilles. 1992. Systèmes d'espaces, systèmes d'acteurs: le cas de la Pointe Saint-Charles. In Montréal : Tableaux d'un espace en transformation, ed. F. Remiggi and G. Sénécal, 153-170. Montréal: Association canadienne-française pour l'avancement de sciences, Cahiers scientifiques 76.
96. Sénécal, Gilles. 1997. Les récits du déclin et de la relance de Montréal face aux défis de l'aménagement urbain. Cahiers de géographie du Québec 41: 381-391.
97. Sénécal, Gilles. 2002. Espaces urbains et qualité de vie : aller au-delà des approches normatives. Horizons: Projet de recherche sur les politiques / Horizons: Policy Research Initiative 5 (1): 20-22.
98. Sénécal, Gilles, Annick Germain and Jacques Bénard. 2002. Portrait des pratiques communautaires et locales en revitalisation urbaine et sociale sur le territoire de l'île de Montréal. Rapport final. Montréal: INRS, Urbanisation, Culture et Société and Centre d'intervention pour la revitalisation des quartiers.
99. Seo, J. K. 2002. Re-urbanisation in regenerated areas of Manchester and Glasgow: new residents and the problems of sustainability. Cities 19: 113-121.
100. Simon, Patrick. 1995. La politique de la ville contre la ségrégation, ou l'idéal d'une ville sans divisions. Annales de la recherche urbaine (68-69): 26-33.
101. Simon, Patrick. 1997. Les usages sociaux de la rue dans un quartier cosmopolite. Espaces et sociétés (90/91): 43-68.
102. Simon, Patrick, Malika Chafi and Thomas Kirszbaum (Groupe d'étude et de lutte contre les discriminations). 2001. Discriminations raciales et ethniques dans l'accès au logement social. Paris : La Documentation française. http:// lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/BRP/014000437/0000.pdf
103. Slater, Tom. 2004. Municipally-managed gentrification in South Parkdale, Toronto. Canadian Geographer / Géographe canadien 48 (3): 303-325.
104. Smith, Neil. 1999. Which new urbanism? New York City and the revanchist 1990s. In The urban moment: Cosmopolitan essays on the late-20th century city, ed. R. Beauregard and S. Body-Gendrot, 185-202. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105. Smith, Neil. 2002. New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 34 (3): 427-450.
106. Société d'habitation du Québec. 2003. Logement abordable Québec: Volet social et communautaire. Information générale. [Québec] : SHQ, Direction du dévéloppement des programmes and Direction de l'habitation communautaire.
107. Steinacker, Annette. 2003. Infill development and affordable housing: patterns from 1996-2000. Urban Affairs Review 38 (4): 492-509.
108. Takahashi, Lois. 1997. The socio-spatial stigmatization of homelessness and HIV/AIDS: Toward an explanation of the NIMBY syndrome. Social Science and Medicine 45 (6): 903-914.
109. Walks, R. Alan. 2004. Place of residence, party preferences and political attitudes in Canadian cities and suburbs. Journal of Urban Affairs 26 (3): 269-295.
110. Warde, Alan. 1991. Gentrification and consumption: issues of class and gender. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 9 (2): 223-232.
111. Wood, Martin. 2003. A balancing act? Tenure diversification in Australia and the UK. Urban Policy and Research 21 (1): 45-56.
112. Wyly, Elvin K., and Daniel J. Hammel. 2000. Capital's metropolis: Chicago and the transformation of American housing policy. Geografiska Annaler Series B 82 (4): 181-206.
113. Wyly, Elvin K. and Daniel J. Hammel. 2003. Mapping Neoliberal American Urbanism. Unpublished paper available from first author at Department of Geography, University of British Columbia.
114. Wynne, Derek and Justin O'Connor. 1998. Consumption and the postmodern city. Urban Studies 35 (5/6): 841-864.
115. Zukin, Sharon. 1998. Urban lifestyles: diversity and standardisation in spaces of consumption. Urban Studies 35 (5/6): 825-839.