Acid etching does not improve CoCrMo implant osseointegration in a canine implant model

HIP International

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 171-178

  Jakobsen, Stig S ^a   Baas, Jorgen ^a   Jakobsen, Thomas ^a   Soballe, Kjeld ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Animals; Biocompatibility; CoCrMo; Dogs; Implant fixation; Loaded implant; Osseointegration; Press fit; Wet etch

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; MOLYBDENUM;

ACID ETCHING; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CHEMICAL PROCEDURES; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR CONDYLE; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL STRESS; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; TIBIA; TOPOGRAPHY; WEIGHT BEARING; ANIMAL; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; DOG; FEMUR; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS; SURGERY;

ANIMALS; DOGS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA;

EID: 77955724801     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070001002000207     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 32: 55-63.
2. Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK, Yang JM, Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2001; 72: 296-305.
3. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29: 389-401.
4. Daugaard H, Elmengaard B, Soballe K, Bechtold J. Bone growth enhancement in vivo on press-fit titanium alloy implants with acid etched micro texture. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87: 434-40.
5. Hacking SA, Harvey EJ, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD. Acid-etched microtexture for enhancement of bone growth into porous-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 1182-9.
6. Hallan G, Lie SA, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE, Havelin LI. Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 1574-80.
7. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 57-70.
8. Linde F, Sorensen HC. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1249-52.
9. Overgaard S, Soballe K, Jorgen H, Gundersen G. Efficiency of systematic sampling in histomorphometric bone research illustrated by hydroxyapatite-coated implants: optimizing the stereological vertical-section design. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 313-21.
10. Gotfredsen K, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Jensen LN. A method for preparing and staining histological sections containing titanium implants for light microscopy. Stain Technol 1989; 64: 121-7.
11. Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJ, Cruz-Orive LM. Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc 1986; 142(Pt3): 259-76.
12. Baas J. Adjuvant therapies of bone graft around non-cemented experimental orthopedic implants. Stereological methods and experiments in dogs. 2008. Acta Orthop Suppl 2008; 79: 1-43.
13. Gundersen HJ, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, et al. The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 1988; 96: 857-81.
14. Sumner DR, Bryan JM, Urban RM, Kuszak JR. Measuring the volume fraction of bone ingrowth: a comparison of three techniques. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 448-52.
15. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, et al. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 26: 119-30.
16. Soballe K. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993; 255: 1-58.
17. Geesink RG. Osteoconductive coatings for total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 395: 53-65.
18. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J. Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 1998; 139: 663-70.
19. Refai AK, Textor M, Brunette DM, Waterfield JD. Effect of titanium surface topography on macrophage activation and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004, 1; 70: 194-205.
20. Rosengren A, Bjursten LM, Danielsen N, Persson H, Kober M. Tissue reactions to polyethylene implants with different surface topography. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999; 10: 75-82.
21. Takebe J, Champagne CM, Offenbacher S, Ishibashi K, Cooper LF. Titanium surface topography alters cell shape and modulates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in the J774A.1 macrophage cell line. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 1; 64: 207-16.
22. Saruwatari L, Aita H, Butz F, et al. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro and ultrastructure. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 2002-16.
23. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 350-7.
24. Kubo K, Att W, Yamada M, et al. Microtopography of titanium suppresses osteoblastic differentiation but enhances chondroblastic differentiation of rat femoral periosteum-derived cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 87: 380-91.