Why the rush to create dubious new sexual disorders?

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 819-820

  Franklin, Karen ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; NOTE; PUBERTY;

EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PUBERTY;

EID: 77955653930     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9616-1     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Blanchard, R. (2010). The fertility of hebephiles and the adaptationist argument against including hebephilia in DSM-5 [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7.
2. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., Dickey, R., & Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335-350.
3. Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of "hebephilia": A response to Blanchard et al. [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(3), 319-320.
4. Heaton, T. B., Lichter, D. T., & Amoateng, A. (1989). The timing of family formation: Rural-urban differentials in first intercourse, childbirth, and marriage. Rural Sociology, 54, 1-16.
5. Kenrick, D. T.,&Keefe, R. C. (1992). Sex differences in age preference: Universal reality or ephemeral construction? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 119-133.
6. Rozin, P. (2000). Evolution and adaptation in the understanding of behavior, culture, and mind. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 970-987.