The fertility of hebephiles and the adaptationist argument against including hebephilia in DSM-5

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 817-818

  Blanchard, Ray ^a,b  

^a CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMAN; NOTE; PUBERTY; SEXUAL DEVIATION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; HETEROSEXUALITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PARAPHILIAS; PUBERTY;

EID: 77955660671     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-010-9610-7     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Blanchard, R.,Kuban,M.E., Blak,T., Klassen, P. E.,Dickey, R.,&Cantor, J. M. (2010). Sexual attraction to others: A comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban,M. E., Cantor, J.M., Blak, T., ..., Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335-350.
3. Franklin, K. (2009). The public policy implications of "hebephilia": A response to Blanchard et al. (2008) [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 319-320.