The border effects in Spain: An industry-level analysis

Empirica

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 455-476

  Requena, Francisco ^a   Llano, Carlos ^b  

^a Polibienestar Research Institute   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bilateral exports; Border effect; Gravity model

Indexed keywords

BILATERAL AGREEMENT; BORDER REGION; EXPORT; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MODELING; TRADE FLOW;

SPAIN;

EID: 77955653543     PISSN: 03408744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10663-010-9123-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alonso O, Chamorro JM, Gonzalez X (2003) Spillovers geográficos y sectoriales de la industria. Revista de Economía Aplicada 32: 77-95.
2. Amiti M (2001) Regional specialisation and technological leapfrogging. J Reg Sci 41(1): 149-172.
3. Amiti M (2005) Location of vertically linked industries: agglomeration versus comparative advantage. Eur Econ Rev 49: 809-832.
4. Anderson MA, Smith SLS (1999) Canadian provinces in world trade: engagement and detachment. Can J Econ 32(1): 23-37.
5. Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93(1): 170-192.
6. Chen N (2004) Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter? J Int Econ 63(1): 93-118.
7. Combes PP, Lafourcade M, Mayer T (2005) The trade-creating effect of business and social networks: evidence from France. J Int Econ 66: 1-29.
8. Daumal M, Zignago S (2008) Border effects of Brazilian states. Working Papers 2008-11, CEPII Research Center.
9. Davis DR, Weinstein DE (1999) Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation. Eur Econ Rev 43: 379-407.
10. Deardorff AV (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassic world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Djankov S, Freund C (2000) Disintegration and trade flows: evidence from the Former Soviet Union. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2378. The World Bank.
12. Ellison G, Glaeser E (1997) Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industry: a dartboard approach. J Polit Econ 105(5): 889-927.
13. Evans CL (2003) The economic significance of national border effects. Am Econ Rev 93(4): 1291-1312.
14. Feenstra R (2002) Border effect and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation. Scott J Polit Econ 49(5): 1021-1035.
15. Forslid R, Haland K, Midlefart Knarvik K (2002) A U-shape Europe? A simulation study of industrial location. J Int Econ 57(2): 273-297.
16. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Gil S, Llorca R, Martínez JA, Oliver J (2005) The border effect in Spain. World Econ 28: 1617-1631.
18. Head K, Mayer T (2000) Non-Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 136(2): 284-314.
19. Head K, Mayer T (2002) Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. CEPII working paper no 2002-01.
20. Helliwell JF (1996) Do national borders matter for Quebec's trade? Can J Econ 29(3): 507-522.
21. Helliwell JF (1998) How much do national borders matter?. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
22. Helliwell JF, Verdier G (2001) Measuring internal trade distances: a new method applied to estimate provincial border effects in Canada. Can J Econ 35(3): 517-530.
23. Hillberry RH (2002) Aggregation bias compositional change, and the border effect. Can J Econ 35(3): 517-530.
24. Hillberry RH, Hummels D (2003) Intranational home bias: some explanations. Rev Econ Stat 85(4): 1089-1092.
25. Hillberry RH, Hummels D (2008) Trade responses to geographic frictions: a decomposition using micro-data. Eur Econ Rev 52(3): 527-550.
26. Llano C (2004a) Economía sectorial y espacial: el comercio interregional en el marco input-output. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Colección Investigaciones, No. 1, 2004.
27. Llano C (2004b) The interregional trade in the context of a multirregional input-output model for Spain. Estudios de Economía Aplicada 22(3): 1-34.
28. Llano C, Esteban A, Pulido A, Pérez J (2008) La base de datos C-intereg sobre el comercio interregional de bienes en España (1995-2006): metodología. Documento de trabajo. Instituto L. Klein. Centro Stone. Septiembre 2008. www. c-intereg. es.
29. McCallum J (1995) National borders matter: Canadian-US regional trade patterns. Am Econ Rev 85(3): 615-623.
30. McDonald JF, Moffit RA (1980) The uses of Tobit analysis. Rev Econ Stat 62(2): 318-321.
31. Millimet D, Osang Th (2007) Do state borders matter for U. S. intranational trade? The role of history and internal migration. Can J Econ 40(1): 93-126.
32. Nitsch V (2000) National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union. Can J Econ 33(4): 1091-1105.
33. Nitsch V (2002) Border effects and border regions: lessons from the German unification. mimeo, Banakgesellschaft, Berlin.
34. Okubo T (2004) The border effect in the Japanese market: a gravity model analysis. Jpn Int Econ 18: 1-11.
35. Pérez J, Llano C, García G (2009) Valoración de las tablas input-output interregionales de la economía española. Revista del ICE 848: 37-65.
36. Poncet S (2003) Measuring Chinese domestic and international integration. China Econ Rev 14(1): 1-21.
37. Puga D (1999) The rise and fall of regional inequalities. Eur Econ Rev 43(2): 303-334.
38. Wei S (1996) Intra-national versus international trade: how stubborn are nations in global integration? NBER working paper 5531.
39. Wolf HC (2000) Intra-national home bias in trade. Rev Econ Stat 82(4): 555-563.