Migrated XLIF cage: Case report and discussion of surgical technique

Orthopedics

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2010, Pages

  Daffner, Scott D ^a   Wang, Jeffrey C ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSEUDARTHROSIS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; FOREIGN BODY; INTERNAL FIXATOR; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION;

FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY MIGRATION; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955643487     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100526-21     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006; 6(4):435-443. (Pubitemid 43964530)
2. Pimenta L, Díaz RC, Guerrero LG. Charité lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006; 5(6):556-561. (Pubitemid 47325346)
3. Wright N. Instrumented extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) through a single approach. Proceedings of the NASS 20th Annual Meeting. Spine J. 2005; 5(4 Suppl):S177-S178.
4. Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(6):321-329.
5. Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Miller JS, Smith CD, Rodts GE Jr. Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51(1):97-103.
6. Zdeblick TA, David SM. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(20):2682-2687.
7. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; (18 Suppl):S1-6.
8. Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, Regan JJ. Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(15):1681-1688.
9. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ. Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech. Epub ahead of print.
10. Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, Park J, Kim DH. Biomechanical comparison: stability of lateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared with anterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lower lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 2(1):62-68.
11. Bess RS, Cornwall GB, Vance RE, et al. Biomechanics of lateral arthrodesis. In: Goodrich JA, Volcan IJ, eds. eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). St. Louis, MO: QMP; 2008:31-40.
12. Buttermann GR, Beaubien BP. In vitro disc pressure profiles below scoliosis fusion constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(20):2134-2142.