In vitro disc pressure profiles below scoliosis fusion constructs

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 2134-2142

  Buttermann, Glenn R ^a,c   Beaubien, Brian P ^b  

^a Midwest Spine Institute   (United States)

^b Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Disc degeneration; Intradiscal pressure; Profilometry; Scoliosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER DONOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR DISK; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; JOINT INSTABILITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; RADIOGRAPHY; VERTEBRA; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; JOINT INSTABILITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 55449113677     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d1d7f     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Buttermann GR, Mullin WJ. Pain and disability correlated with disc degeneration via magnetic resonance imaging in scoliosis patients. Eur Spine J 2008;17:240-9.
2. Nachemson AL. Disc pressure measurements. Spine 1981;6:93-7.
3. Polga DJ, Beaubien BP, Kallemeier PM, et al. Measurement of in vivo intradiscal pressure in healthy thoracic intervertebral discs. Spine 2004;29: 1320-4.
4. Schultz A, Andersson G, Ortengren R, et al. Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:713-20.
5. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 1999;24:7 55-62.
6. McNally DS, Adams MA. Internal intervertebral disc mechanics as revealed by stress profilometry. Spine 1992;17:66-73.
7. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. 'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78: 965-72.
8. Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, et al. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 1997;22:1085-91.
9. Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, et al. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol 1996;80:839-46.
10. Wenger KH, Woods JA, Holecek A, et al. Matrix remodeling expression in anulus cells subjected to increased compressive load. Spine 2005;30:1122-6.
11. Iatridis JC, Mente PL, Stokes IA, et al. Compression-induced changes in intervertebral disc properties in a rat tail model. Spine 1999;24:996-1002.
12. Lotz JC, Colliou OK, Chin JR, et al. Compression-induced degeneration of the intervertebral disc: an in vivo mouse model and finite-element study. Spine 1998;23:2493-506.
13. Lotz JC, Chin JR. Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading. Spine 2000;25:1477-83.
14. Maclean JJ, Lee CR, Grad S, et al. Effects of immobilization and dynamic compression on intervertebral disc cell gene expression in vivo. Spine 2003; 28:973-81.
15. Maclean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, et al. Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1193-200.
16. Walsh AJ, Lotz JC. Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading. J Biomech 2004;37:329-37.
17. Aigner T, Gresk-otter KR, Fairbank JC, et al. Variation with age in the pattern of type X collagen expression in normal and scoliotic human intervertebral discs. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;63:263-8.
18. Antoniou J, Arlet V, Goswami T, et al. Elevated synthetic activity in the convex side of scoliotic intervertebral discs and endplates compared with normal tissues. Spine 2001;26:E198-206.
19. Bibby SR, Fairbank JC, Urban MR, et al. Cell viability in scoliotic discs in relation to disc deformity and nutrient levels. Spine 2002;27:2220-8.
20. Brickley-Parsons D, Glimcher MJ. Is the chemistry of collagen in intervertebral discs an expression of Wolff's Law? A study of the human lumbar spine. Spine 1984;9:148-63.
21. Bushell GR, Ghosh P, Taylor TK, et al. The collagen of the intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979;61-B:501-8.
22. Court C, Colliou OK, Chin JR, et al. The effect of static in vivo bending on the murine intervertebral disc. Spine J 2001;l:239-45.
23. Crean JK, Roberts S, Jaffray DC, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in the human intervertebral disc: role in disc degeneration and scoliosis. Spine 1997;22:2877-84.
24. Duance VC, Crean JK, Sims TJ, et al. Changes in collagen cross-linking in degenerative disc disease and scoliosis. Spine 1998;23:2545-51.
25. Ghosh P, Bushell GR, Taylor TK, et al. Distribution of glycosaminoglycans across the normal and the scoliotic disc. Spine 1980;5:310-7.
26. Lindblom K. Intervertebral-disc degeneration considered as a pressure atrophy.J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957;39-A:933-45.
27. Melrose J, Gurr KR, Cole TC, et al. The influence of scoliosis and ageing on proteoglycan heterogeneity in the human intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1991;9:68-77.
28. Xu H, Qiu G, Wu Z, et al. Expression of transforming growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor and core protein of proteoglycan in human vertebral cartilaginous endplate of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:1973-8.
29. Court C, Chin JR, Liebenberg E, et al. Biological and mechanical consequences of transient intervertebral disc bending. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1899-906.
30. Meir AR, Fairbank JC, Jones DA, et al. High pressures and asymmetrical stresses in the scoliotic disc in the absence of muscle loading. Scoliosis 2007; 2:4.
31. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001;26:1873-8.
32. Buttermann GR, Beaubien BP. Bovine lumbar intradiscal pressures and motion segment biomechanics. Spine J In press.
33. Schultz A, Cromwell R, Warwick D, et al. Lumbar trunk muscle use in standing isometric heavy exertions. J Orthop Res 1987;5:320-9.
34. Cappozzo A. Compressive loads in the lumbar vertebral column during normal level walking. J Orthop Res 1984;l:292-301.
35. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 1999; 24:2468-74.
36. McMillan DW, McNally DS, Garbutt G, et al. Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs: the validity of experimental "stress profilometry." Proc.Inst Mech Eng[H] 1996;210:81-7.
37. Edwards WT, Ordway NR, Zheng Y, et al. Peak stresses observed in the posterior lateral anulus. Spine 2001;26:1753-9.
38. Hayes MA, Tompkins SF, Herndon WA, et al. Clinical and radiological evaluation of lumbosacral motion below fusion levels in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1988;13-.1161-7.
39. Brown KM, Ludwig SC, Gelb DE. Radiographic predictors of outcome after long fusion to L5 in adult scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004;17:358-66.
40. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, et al. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radio-graphic and clinical analysis. Spine 2002;27:3 87-92.
41. Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, et al. Objective quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties using MRI in idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:3 86-91.
42. Robitaille M, Aubin CE, Labelle H. Intra and interobserver variability of preoperative planning for surgical instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1604-14.