Summer in the city: Achievement gains in Chicago's Summer Bridge program

Summer Learning: Research, Policies, and Programs

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 73-102

  Roderick, Melissa ^a   Jacob, Brian A ^b   Bryk, Anthony S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955642766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610362     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Cooper, H., Charlton, K., Valentine, J. C., & Muhlenbruck, L. (2000). Making the most of summer school: A meta-analytic and narrative review. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(1, Serial No. 260).
2. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97-110.
3. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the burden of acting White. Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
4. Hess, G. A. (1999). Expectations, opportunity, capacity, and will: The four essential components of Chicago school reform. Educational Policy, 13, 494-517.
5. House, E. R. (1998). The predictable failure of Chicago's student retention program. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, School of Education.
6. Johnston, R. C. (2000, September 6). Bumper summer school crop yields mixed test results. Education Week, 6, p. 10.
7. MacIver, D. J., Reuman, D. A., & Main, S. R. (1995). Social structuring of the school: Studying what is, illuminating what could be. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 375-400.
8. Mathews, J. (2000, June 13). Hot debate on value of summer school. The Washington Post, p. A24.
9. Mickelson, R. (1990). The attitude achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
10. Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulus, S. (1999). The long-term effects of small class sizes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127-142.
11. Roderick, M., Bryk, A. S., Jacob, B., Easton, J. Q., & Allensworth, E. (1999). Ending social promotion: Results from the first two years. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
12. Roderick, M., Jacob, B., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). The impact of high stakes testing in Chicago on student achievement in promotional gate grades. Chicago: University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration.
13. Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., Bacon, J., & Easton, J. Q. (2000). Update: Ending social promotion. Passing, retention and achievement trends among promoted and retained students. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
14. Smith, B. (1998). It's about time: Opportunities to learn in Chicago's elementary schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
15. Smith, J. B., Smith, B., & Bryk, A. S. (1998). Setting the pace: Opportunities to learn in Chicago's elementary schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
16. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the test performance of academically successful African Americans. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 401-430). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
17. Stipek, D. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York, Macmillan.
18. Suarez-Orozco, M., & Suarez-Orozco, C. (1995). Trans-formations: Immigration, family life and achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.