Expectations, opportunity, capacity, and will: The four essential components of Chicago school reform

Educational Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 494-517

  Hess, G Alfred ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844456297     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904899013004002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blank, R. K., & Schilder, D. (1991). State policies and state role in curriculum. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 37-62). New York: Falmer.
2. Bloomfield, D. C., & Cooper, B. S. (1998). Recentralization or strategic management? A new governance model of the New York City Public Schools. New York: Center for Educational Outreach and Innovation of Columbia University.
3. Brookover, W. B., & Lezotte, L. W. (1979). Changes in school characteristics coincident with changes in student achievement. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
4. Bryk, A. S., Easton, J. Q., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S. G., & Sebring, P. A. (1993). A view from the elementary schools: The state of reform in Chicago. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
5. Bryk, A. S., Thum, Y. M., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (1998). Academic productivity of Chicago public elementary schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
6. Byrd defends school anti-dropout role. (1987, January 18). Chicago Tribune, p. 4-2.
7. Cohen, D. K. (1996). Rewarding teachers for student performance. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 60-112). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Designs for Change. (1985). The bottom line: Chicago's failing schools and how to save them. Chicago: Author.
9. Duffrin, E. (1996). Direct instruction making waves. Catalyst: Voices of Chicago School Reform, 8(1), 1, 4-5.
10. Easton, J. Q., Bryk, A. S., Driscoll, M. E., Kotsakis, J. G., Sebring, P. A., & van der Ploeg, A. J. (1991). Charting reform: The teachers' turn. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Reform.
11. Easton, J. Q., Flinspach, S. L., Ford, D. J., Qualls, J., Ryan, S. R., & Storey, S. L. (1991). Decision making and school improvement: LSCs in the first two years of reform. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.
12. Edmonds, R. (1979, October). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-18.
13. Etheridge, C. P., & Collins, T. W. (1992). Conflict in restructuring the principal-teacher relationship in Memphis. In G. A. Hess, Jr. (Ed.), Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists (pp. 89-102). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
14. Fullan, M. G. (1993). Coordinating school and district development in restructuring. In J. Murphy & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Restructuring schooling: Learning from on going efforts (pp. 143-164). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
15. Glass, T.E., & Sanders, W.D. (1978). Community control in education: A study in power transition. Midland, MI: Pendell.