Urban land-use zoning based on ecological evaluation for large conurbations in less developed regions: Case study in Foshan, China

Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 116-124

  Yong, Yi ^a   Zhang, Hao ^a   Wang, Xiang Rong ^a   Schubert, Uwe ^b  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Ecological capacity; Ecological footprint; Ecological suitability; Ecosystem service; Foshan, China; Land use; Urban planning; Zoning

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL CAPACITY; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ECOLOGICAL SUITABILITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOSHAN, CHINA;

ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE; OPTIMIZATION; URBAN PLANNING;

ZONING;

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION; ZONING SYSTEM;

CHINA; FOSHAN; GUANGDONG;

EID: 77955621915     PISSN: 07339488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:2(116)     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abbott C. The Portland region: Where city and suburbs talk to each other-And often agree. Hous. Policy Debate 1997, 8(1):11-51. ZZZZZZ, 1051-1482.
2. Bolund P. Hunhammear S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecologic. Econ. 1999, 29:293-301. ECECEM, 0921-8009, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
3. Bradley G.A. Urban forestry landscapes: Integrating multidisciplinary perspectives 1995, University of Washington Press, Seattle.
4. Buchecker M. Hunziker M. Kienast F. Participatory landscape development: Overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2003, 64:29-46. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00199-8.
5. Calthorpe P. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream 1993, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
6. Calthorpe P. Fulton W. The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl 2001,Island Press, Washington, D.C.
7. Costanza R. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260. NATUAS, 0028-0836, 10.1038/387253a0.
8. de Groot W.T. van den Born R.J. G. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in The Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2003, 63:127-138. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00184-6.
9. Compact cities and sustainable urban development: A critical assessment of policies and plans from an international perspective 2001, de Roo, G., Miller, D., and, eds., Ashgate Publishing Co., Aldershot, U.K.
10. Dokmeci V.F. Cagdas G. Multiobjective land-use planning model. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 1993, 119(1):15-22. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1993)119:1(15).
11. Duany A. Plater-Zyberk E. Speck J. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream 2001, North Point Press, San Francisco.
12. Freilich R.H. From sprawl to smart growth: Successful legal, planning, and environmental system 1999, American Bar Association Publishing, Chicago.
13. ECOCITY: Book I- A better place to live 2005, 7-8. Gaffron, P., Huismans, G., Skala, F., and, eds., Facultas Verlags-und Buchhandels AG, Vienna, .
14. Grey G.W. The urban forest: Comprehensive management 1996, Wiley, New York.
15. Hara Y. Takeuchi K. Okubo S. Urbanization linked with past agricultural landuse patterns in the urban fringe of a deltaic Asian mega-city: A case studying Bangkok. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2005, 73:16-28. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.07.002.
16. Jenks M. Williams K. Burton E. The compact city: A sustainable form? 1996,E & FN Spon, London.
17. Compact cities: Sustainable urban forms for developing countries 2000, Jenks, M., Williams, K., Burton, E., and, eds., E & FN Spon, London.
18. Jim C.Y. Chen S.S. Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing City, China. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2003, 65:95-116. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00244-X.
19. Katz P. The new urbanism: Toward an architecture of community 1993, McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. The pedestrian pocket book: A new suburban design strategy 1989, Kelbaugh, D., ed., Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
21. Kühn M. Greenbelt and green heart: Separating and integrating landscapes in European city regions. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2003, 64:19-27. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00198-6.
22. Lambin E.F. Land-use and land-cover change, implementation. Strategy[R]. 1999, IGBP Rep. No.48, IGBP, Stockholm, Sweden.
23. Li F. Wang R.S. Paulussen J. Liu X.S. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: A case study in Beijing, China. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2005, 72:325-336. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.002.
24. Lütz M. Bastian O. Implementation of landscape planning and nature conservation in the agricultural landscape-A case study from Saxony. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 92:159-170. AEENDO, 0167-8809, 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00300-0.
25. Lynn N.A. Brown R.D. Effects if recreational use impacts on hiking experiences innatural areas. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2003, 64:77-87. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00202-5.
26. Miller R.W. Urban forestry: Planning and managing urban green spaces 1988, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
27. Moss M. Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the 'transformation of agricultural landscapes'. Landscape Ecol. 2000, 15:303-311. LAECEH, 0921-2973, 10.1023/A:1008144402408.
28. The statistical book of Foshan (year 2002) 2003, Municipal Bureau of Statistic of Foshan, Municipal Bureau of Statistic of Foshan Press, Foshan, China.
29. Statistical bulletin of national economy and social development of year 2004. 2005, Municipal Bureau of Statistic of Foshan, . 〈〉 (Oct. 12, 2005) (in Chinese).
30. Nijkamp P. van Delft H. van Veen-Groot D. Sustainable mobility and globalisation: New research and policy challenges 1998, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
31. Odum E.P. Fundamentals of ecology 1959, 546. 1st Ed., Saunders, Philadelphia, .
32. Renne J. Wells J. Emerging European-style planning in the USA: Transit-oriented development. World Transp. Policy Pract. 2004, 10(2):12-24. 1352-7614.
33. Saizen I. Mizuno K. Kobayashi S. Effects of land-use master plans in the metropolitan fringe of Japan. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2006, 78(4):411-421. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.002.
34. Shadewald J.K. Hallmark S. Souleyrette R.R. Vissualizing system-wide economic impacts of transportation projects. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2001, 127(4):158-168. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:4(158).
35. Shafer C. US national park buffer zones: Historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects. Environ. Manage. (N.Y.) 1999, 23(1):49-73. EMNGDC, 0364-152X, 10.1007/s002679900167.
36. Skala F. Ecocity objectives. Project of ecocity 'urban development towards appropriate structures for sustainable transport'. Ecocity: Book I-A better place to live 2005, 13-33. Facultas Verlags-und Buchhandels AG, Vienna, .
37. Talen E. Land use zoning and human diversity: Exploring the connection. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2005, 131(4):214-232. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(214).
38. Teal M. Huang C.S. Rodiek J. Open space planning for Travis Country, Austin, Texas: A collaborative design. Landsc. Urban Plann. 1998, 42:259-268. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00091-7.
39. Tress B. Tress G. Fry G. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2005, 70:177-191. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.013.
40. Tumlin J. Millard-Ball A. How to make transit-oriented development work planning magazine. Planning 2003, 69(5):14-19..
41. Turner B.L. Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan[R]. 1995, IGBP Rep. No.35 and HDP Rep. No. 7, IGBP, Stockholm, Sweden.
42. Tyrväinen L. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. J. Environ. Manage. 2001, 62:75-92. JEVMAW, 0301-4797, 10.1006/jema.2001.0421.
43. World urbanization prospects: The 2003 revision, data tables and highlights. 2004, 1-3. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, Rep. No.ESA/P/WP.190, United Nations, New York, .
44. van Asselt Marjolein B.A. Rigkens-Klomp N. A look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environ. Change 2002, 12:167-184. GECHET, 0959-3780, 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00012-2.
45. Verhoef E. Ubbels B. Rodenburg C. Sustainable mobility 2001, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
46. von Haaren C. Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2002, 60:73-80. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00060-9.
47. Wackernagel M. Ecological footprints of nations. Proc., Earth Council for the Rio+5 Forum 1997, 10-21. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto, Canada.
48. Wackernagel M. Lewan L. Hansson C.B. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint applications in Sweden and subregions. Ambio 1999, 28(7):604-611. AMBOCX, 0044-7447.
49. Wang R.S. Chi J. Ouyang Z.Y. Eco-integration for sustainable development of middle and small sized towns 2001,Meteorologic Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
50. Wang X.R. Ecological planning and sustainable development: A case study of an urban development zone in Shanghai, China. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World. 1998, 3:204-206.
51. Whitford V. Ennos A.R. Handley J.F. City form and natural process-Indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2001, 57(2):91-103. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X.
52. William E.R. Wackernagel M. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: Measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. Investing in natural capital 1994, Chap. 20, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
53. Caring for the Earth: A strategy for sustainable living 1991, The World Conservation Union (IUCN), World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), and United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), IUCN/WWF/UNEP, Gland, Switzerland.
54. Wu J.G. Hobbs R. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol. 2002, 17:355-365. LAECEH, 0921-2973, 10.1023/A:1020561630963.
55. Yang K. Yang Y. Chen J. Ecological footprint analysis: Concept, method and case. Adv. Earth Sci. 2000, 15(6):630-636..
56. Yang Z. Jia Z. Microanalysis of shopping center location in terms of retail supply quality and environmental impact. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2002, 128(3):139-149. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2002)128:3(139).
57. Yokohari M. Beyond greenbelts and zoning: A new planning concept for the environment of Asian mega-cities. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2000, 47:159-171. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00084-5.
58. Yu K. Security patterns: A defensive approach toward landscape and environmental planning. Proc., Athens Int. Conf., Urban Regional Environmental Planning and Informatics to Planning in an Era of Transition 1997, 453-463. National Technical Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece, .
59. Zeng H. Liu G. Regional eco-risk analysis based on landscape structure. China Environ. Sci. 1999, 19(5):454-457. 1003-1189.
60. Zhang H. Regional integrated ecological protection strategy for the future metropol is area of Great Nanning. J. Fudan Univ. Nat. Sci. 2003, 42(3):509-513. 0427-7104.
61. Zhang H. Ecological planning of regional development and integrated strategical decision-making: A case study of Nanning. J. Fudan Univ. Nat. Sci. 2004, 43(6):967-971. 0427-7104.