Assessing the agreement among pavement condition indexes

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 765-772

  Gharaibeh, Nasir G ^a   Zou, Yajie ^a   Saliminejad, Siamak ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Condition assessment; Pavement management; Pavement performance; Transportation asset management

Indexed keywords

CONDITION ASSESSMENTS; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; MATERIAL INTEGRITY; PAVEMENT CONDITION; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE; RIDE QUALITY; SCATTER PLOTS; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS; TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT;

ASSET MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; STEEL BRIDGES;

PAVEMENTS;

PAVEMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77955619711     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000141     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Transportation asset management guide 2002, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO),Pub. Code: RP-TAMG-1, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
2. Carey WN, Irick PE. The pavement serviceability performance concept. 1960, Bulletin 250, Highway Research Board.
3. McKay DT, Rens KL, Greimann LF, Stecker JH. Condition index assessment for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1999, 5(2):52-60. JITSE4, 1076-0342, 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1999)5:2(52).
4. McNeil S, Markow MM, Neumann L, Ordway J, Uzarski D. Emerging issues in transportation facilities management. J. Transp. Eng. 1992, 118(4):477-495. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:4(477).
5. Morian D, Cumberledge G. Techniques for selecting pavement rehabilitation strategies: Pennsylvania case studies. 1997, Transportation Research Record.1568, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
6. Mullis C, Shippen N, Brooks E, Reid I. Automated data collection equipment for monitoring highway condition. 2005, Rep. No.FHWA-OR-RD-05-10, Oregon Dept. of Transportation (ORDOT), Salem, Ore.
7. Neumann LA, Markow MJ. Performance-based planning and asset management. Public Works Manage. Policy 2004, 8:156-161. ZZZZZZ, 1087-724X, 10.1177/1087724X03259474.
8. 2004, Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2004 Pavement Condition Rating System.
9. Papagiannakis A, Gharaibeh N, Weissmann J, Wimsatt A. Pavement scores synthesis. 2009, Rep. No.FHWA/TX-09/0-6386-1, Texas Transportation Institute and Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, Tex.
10. Automated pavement condition survey field manual 2008, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), Pub. No. 336 (4-08), Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation, Harrisburg, Pa.
11. Infrastructure condition assessment: Art, science & practice. Conf. Proc., ASCE 1997, Saito, M. ed., ASCE, New York.
12. Shahin MY, Darter MI, Kohn SD. Pavement condition evaluation of asphalt surfaced airfield pavements. Proc., Association of Asphalt Paving Technology 1978, 190-228, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Lino Lakes, Minn.
13. Shahin MY, Darter MI, Kohn SD. Condition evaluation of jointed concrete airfield pavement. Transp. Engrg. J. 1980, 106(4):381-399. TPEJAN, 0569-7891.
14. SDDOT's enhanced pavement management system: Synopsis 2000, South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT), South Dakota Dept. of Transportation, Pierre, S.D.
15. Stampley BE, Miller B, Smith RE, Scullion T. Pavement management information system concepts, equations, and analysis of pavements. 1995, Research Rep. No.1989-1, Texas Transportation Institute and Texas Dept. of Transportation, Austin, Tex.
16. Zimmerman KA, Grogg MG, Bozkurt D. Effects of maintenance treatments on asphalt concrete pavement management. 2002, Rep. No.SD2001-03, South Dakota Dept. of Transportation, Pierre, S.D.